I bought a cheap android tab and loaded the app, cheap and very easy
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Using Tapatalk
ricky.huyser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62416
View this thread: http:/
I've had a Transporter since 2006 when I purchased it. I also have
2-SB3s and a Duet. My Transporter has NEVER had a problem and I love
how it sounds and looks!! That being said, I could part with it for the
right price if anyone were interested… just sayin'.
Eric Seaberg - San Diego
-A.E.S.
I'd almost certainly go with a good async USB DAC as jitter is
essentially removed from the equation. So a Touch with the EDO
extension installed would be my preferred choice. Although I do quite
like those tube displays...
Listening Room: Squeezebox Touch (EDO) > USB Hub > USB Isolator >
Aud
really, you are much better off spending your money on a good external
DAC, and feeding it from any SB - Touch or SB3. i used to want to buy a
Transporter but all the spots where taken, and as i recently built my
new system (see Pics of your system) i got a Benchmark DAC2HGC (which is
superb), and
Hi,
maybe i'm the only one, but I wouldn't go for the Transporter!
This is why mine died after about 3 years, and of course no service
through Logitech!
So on the "Low End" side I'm still going with Touch, Classic,
Receiver...
On the High End Side I switched to Linn.
regards
carrera
SBClas
I have a Transporter as my main unit, with a Radio and a Duet servicing
auxiliary spaces. I also have two Touches, as yet unused, in their
boxes, awaiting deployment.
Aside from sound quality issues (I am obviously not qualified from
personal experience), I would say go for the Transporter for
Another use for EDO is USB only DAC's . They are quite common , the idea
behind them is to have good computer audio and USB is commonly found on
computers . Now you can utilise such a product on a Touch .
IMO it is quite silly to not have multiple inputs on a DAC , I like my
products practical ie
Yesfan70 wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the replies.
>
> I like both, but I'm really sold on the cool factor of the Transporter.
> That's where I'm leaning. The Touch is cheaper (a plus), but not by much
> compared to it's price before Logitech stopped producing them. Can
> someone explain a litt
Thanks everybody for the replies.
I like both, but I'm really sold on the cool factor of the Transporter.
That's where I'm leaning. The Touch is cheaper (a plus), but not by much
compared to it's price before Logitech stopped producing them. Can
someone explain a little more about the EDO plugin
Mnyb wrote:
>
> In any case , a hint I many others are using the displays on any
> squeezebox as little as possible to preserve lifetime .
>
Yes, I use the BLANKSAVER plugin so that my Transporter displays are OFF
when I'm not playing something.
Mnyb wrote:
>
> DAC quality , it basically fl
Yeah the transporter is high quality , the only thing that would worry
me a bit in an old used unit is the VFD displays ( 2 of them ) .
But if the price is rigth...
A Toy quality thing like Touch can last a while too just wondering a bit
about it's display quality .
In any case , a hint I many o
Yesfan70 wrote:
> I have a 3 Squeeze boxes (two v3 and one original), but have thought
> about adding a "higher end" player to my home theater room. I've always
> wanted the Transporter, but the Touch looks like a great player as well.
> Is there any advantages of one over the other?
>
>
> On a
I recently purchased a brand new SB Touch at a tidy profit for the
seller. It will arrive shortly. I did consider a used Transporter. I
think the Transporter has the higher cool factor, but the Touch will do
nicely and should sound excellent in my system. I already have a SB or
six, so the Tou
It's just my opinion but previously I always wanted a transporter but in
all honesty I'd go for a Touch in preference to the transporter. Mainly
for the reasons given above and also for possible future upgrades with a
DAC and the EDO plugin.
Sent from my HUAWEI Y300-0100 using Tapatalk
--
Yesfan70 wrote:
> I have a 3 Squeeze boxes (two v3 and one original), but have thought
> about adding a "higher end" player to my home theater room. I've always
> wanted the Transporter, but the Touch looks like a great player as well.
> Is there any advantages of one over the other?
>
>
> On a
15 matches
Mail list logo
