Hi
Okay, this thread is going nowhere. I understand you are trying to
encourage others to be civil but the subject line is not a good way
of going about it.
Our mail list guidelines specifically prohibit personal attacks or
other rude behaviour. See
Morgan Olsson wrote:
I still can not find OOo2 final in swedish...
The download page still serves RC3 files.
RC3 is identical to the final version. But localizations are not
relabeled as final until the associated native-lang community has
finished quality assurance testing of the localized
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Sam Hiser wrote:
[snip]
Adelstein has a paper on line about techniques for combating
Disinformation
[snip]
What is the URL?
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents kill innovation and harm all Net-based business.
Keep them out of the EU by
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:29 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Sam Hiser wrote:
[snip]
Adelstein has a paper on line about techniques for combating
Disinformation
25 Ways to Suppress the Truth
http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/disinfo.htm
This is real CIA-grade
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:23 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
The governor's role is still unclear. MS is probably working on him
heavily.
Not to worry. He's a Bain Consultant: smart, gets open standards, knows
precisely what MS is up to. I'd call him impervious to their influence.
The more
Hi Chuck,
Chuck wrote:
Outlook has an option to let you use MS Word as your email editor. Does
anyone know if it's possible to make it use OOo Writer instead? The more
I work with OOo the more a like it over MS Office.
Why don't you give a try to Thunderbird ?
Thanks. That guide is quite useful and many shills seem to be using
something simliar to it as a playbook. It's not pure logic, but also a
bit of strategy.
A more generalized list of logic is this:
http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/index.htm
but it unlike the 25 ways... it does
Sam Hiser wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:00 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
Sam Hiser wrote:
http://samhiser.blogspot.com/2005/10/commonwealth-senate-meets-on-holloween.html
To me it sounds like some people are concerned about losing some
election funding from Microsoft more than what is
Lars D. Noodén wrote:
Thanks. That guide is quite useful and many shills seem to be using
something simliar to it as a playbook. It's not pure logic, but also a
bit of strategy.
A more generalized list of logic is this:
http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/index.htm
but it unlike the 25
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Robin Laing wrote:
[snip]
I just thought of something. Wasn't Microsoft's first document against Linux
with FUD called the Halloween paper or something like that. :)
[snip]
They should be here, but have very recently moved.
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Chuck wrote:
Outlook has an option to let you use MS Word as your email editor. Does
anyone know if it's possible to make it use OOo Writer instead? The more
I work with OOo the more a like it over MS Office.
Why don't you give a try to Thunderbird ?
my experiance has always been that openoffice is slow and clunky. It
has great potential put it isn't there quite yet
On 11/1/05, RobinH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a test which
purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared
with MS
Sam Hiser wrote:
http://samhiser.blogspot.com/2005/10/commonwealth-senate-meets-on-holloween.html
Transcript, summary, and audio at:
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1696
--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See
http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
Hi Rob,
RobinH wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a test which
purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared
with MS Office.
Can anyone comment? It sound like another put-up job. My experience
with Open Office has been good.
Please read this thread :
RobinH wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a test which
purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared
with MS Office.
Can anyone comment? It sound like another put-up job. My experience
with Open Office has been good.
I'm running Linux, so I can't really
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 06:50 +1300, RobinH wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a test which
purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared
with MS Office.
Can anyone comment? It sound like another put-up job. My experience
with Open Office has been good.
It
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:52 -0600, Matthew Keathley wrote:
my experiance has always been that openoffice is slow and clunky. It
has great potential put it isn't there quite yet
This is also true and one reason the development model needs to be
opened up. Thankfully there are influential
So where is OpenOffice's version of InfoPath or Visio? I am a developer for
a large technology company and I use Office a lot! I write some functional
and detail designs and use Visio for UML diagrams.
Senior Programmer
Wes Hobbie
On 10/31/05, Wesley Hobbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where is OpenOffice's version of InfoPath or Visio? I am a developer
for
a large technology company and I use Office a lot! I write some functional
and detail designs and use Visio for UML diagrams.
Senior Programmer
Wes Hobbie
To
There is not a comparable component of OOo to Visio. OO draw can be
used instead of visio, but they are really different products so for
the professional I woulnd't recommend it.
There are opensource packages that can replace visio (eg, dia). I'm
sure there are some that also replace InfoPath
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 09:17 +1300, Paul wrote:
There is not a comparable component of OOo to Visio. OO draw can be
used instead of visio, but they are really different products so for
the professional I woulnd't recommend it.
Consider buying a vector drawing program. Xara is excellent but
Wesley Hobbie wrote:
So where is OpenOffice's version of InfoPath or Visio? I am a
developer for a large technology company and I use Office a lot! I
write some functional and detail designs and use Visio for UML
diagrams.
Senior Programmer Wes Hobbie
You may wish to check ArgoUML and
To answer the OP's original question - I don't believe it is possible
to have OOo writer as the 'inbuilt' email composer for Outlook (or
even Thunderbird).
Problem is the email that
gets sent doesn't look the same as what I composed when using
stationery. It gets indented a couple of extra tab
Quoting Lars D. Noodén [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Robin Laing wrote:
[snip]
I just thought of something. Wasn't Microsoft's first document against
Linux
with FUD called the Halloween paper or something like that. :)
[snip]
They should be here, but have very recently moved.
Quoting Robin Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sam Hiser wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:00 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
Sam Hiser wrote:
http://samhiser.blogspot.com/2005/10/commonwealth-senate-meets-on-holloween.html
To me it sounds like some people are concerned about losing some
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:12:27 -0700
Robin Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Hiser wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:00 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
Sam Hiser wrote:
http://samhiser.blogspot.com/2005/10/commonwealth-senate-meets-on-
holloween.html
snip
I just thought of something.
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:25:58 -0500
Sam Hiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:51 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
I've finally read through David's well thought out Comments on
Microsoft's Letter
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20051029212458555mode=nested
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:50:05 -0500
Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook has an option to let you use MS Word as your email editor.
Does anyone know if it's possible to make it use OOo Writer instead?
The more I work with OOo the more a like it over MS Office.
Thanks.
This can be
On 2005-11-01, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Linux, so I can't really compare, but... if, when I upgrade
my o/s, I can get Abiword running, I may skip OO.dog most of the time.
900MHz, 192M RAM, RH 9 (upgraded), and it takes around 30 sec. or more
*just* to get where I can click
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:52:14 -0600
Matthew Keathley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my experiance has always been that openoffice is slow and clunky. It
has great potential put it isn't there quite yet
On 11/1/05, RobinH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a
Someone points out a flaw in OpenOffice.org - therefore they must be (a)
evil (b) stupid (c) wrong (d) working for Microsoft and (e) torn apart.
How about we say ok - there's a problem here, we should work on getting OOo
to be less piggy with the system resources?
-Chad Smith
On 11/1/05,
Sophie Gautier said the following on 11/01/2005 12:53 PM:
Hi Rob,
RobinH wrote:
There is an article today on ZDnet describing a test which
purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared
with MS Office.
Can anyone comment? It sound like another put-up job. My experience
with
Chad Smith wrote:
Someone points out a flaw in OpenOffice.org - therefore they must be (a)
evil (b) stupid (c) wrong (d) working for Microsoft and (e) torn apart.
How about we say ok - there's a problem here, we should work on getting OOo
to be less piggy with the system resources?
-Chad Smith
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:07:55 -0600
Wesley Hobbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where is OpenOffice's version of InfoPath or Visio? I am a
developer for a large technology company and I use Office a lot! I
write some functional and detail designs and use Visio for UML
diagrams.
Senior
I've used it and it works great. Other than not being able to run the
java portions of OOo their wasn't any problems.
On 11/1/05, Jacqueline McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using or has tried Portable OpenOffice.org ?
See: http://johnhaller.com/jh/useful_stuff/portable_openoffice/
Thank you,
Although I am a silent listener, I often wonder if people take the time to
understand the implications of what I know I and my like me are doing and
that is cutting him off completely.
I was merely playing the advocate on his behalf, I was not condoning his
verbal actions and mental
John Thompson wrote:
On 2005-11-01, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Linux, so I can't really compare, but... if, when I upgrade
my o/s, I can get Abiword running, I may skip OO.dog most of the time.
900MHz, 192M RAM, RH 9 (upgraded), and it takes around 30 sec. or more
*just* to
It would hardly bear a response if it were an isolated incident, but if
one looks outside the scope of just OOo, then it's about one a day.
Sometimes it's more. ZDNet is not alone.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents kill innovation and harm all Net-based business.
Be careful about getting dragged into the M$ alternate definitions of
English words. There currently is no *standard* in use in Massachusetts.
The current binary MS formats may certainly be ubiquitous, but are
anything but standard. There are variations for each version of each
package on
Mark recommended a very instructive debate FAQ, though set in the context
of theology it looks quite useful in dealing with some of the chaff being
thrown out by much of the media on behalf of MS:
Debate and logic FAQ
http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html
Much of the debate
40 matches
Mail list logo
