An idea is to make the symbols page a little easier to use. Some
ideas include letting the user assign shortcuts to different symbols.
That would really help those in school taking different languages, by
allowing them to insert commonly used letters that have accents.
Otherwise, the user
On 19/01/2006, at 6:56 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 23:09 +, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Jeff Causey wrote:
According to the article I referenced by Bruce Byfield, the
Navigator equivalent in Writer is the Outline View. He seemed
to think Word's
On 19/01/2006, at 6:59 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
I would also add to that list * Uses advanced/up-to-date
technologies such as XForms and web services
architecture.
I know XForms do not excist in MsO.
And that XForms have much to do with web services
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
Agreed. In Calc, there are a couple of things that can only be done
using the Navigator (or at least pre-2.0 versions). Check out the
scenarios for example.
And what about linking or copying named ranges from another spreadsheet,
just with the Navigator.
Let's
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
On 19/01/2006, at 6:59 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Do you or does anyone else know how I have to weigth this point in
comparing with MsO?
I think the closest that I have heard of is something called SharePoint
from memory. This apparently is some method of sharing between
Hi,
Browsing the mailing list archive, stops at 2006-1-17 ...
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/SummarizeList?listName=discussby=date
--
- - - - - - - - - -
-Cor Nouws-
- www.nouenoff.nl -
- - - - OOo - - - -
-
To
On 19/01/2006, at 9:05 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
On 19/01/2006, at 6:59 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Do you or does anyone else know how I have to weigth this point
in comparing with MsO?
I think the closest that I have heard of is something called
SharePoint
from memory.
Hi,
please file an issue to the component www and sub component mailing list
regarding this problem.
Kind regards, Joost
Browsing the mailing list archive, stops at 2006-1-17 ...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
But as I understand it, and speak up with corrections, MOOX and the
earlier MS XML formats are incomplete and that they are a marketing
response to OpenDocument's development.
That is you cannot take what MS has documented and implement a working
format, too many key components are wrapped up
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'll reiterate my point about styles in OO as well - MSO has the same
capability. The one selling point about styles I think OO can make
is page styles.
Page styles matter. Does MSO have a Navigator and Stylist? Does it use
Jeff Causey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:43CEC7BA.8000705
@triad.rr.com:
According to the article I referenced by Bruce Byfield, the Navigator
equivalent in Writer is the Outline View. He seemed to think Word's
implementation was superior. As I indicated, I haven't really used
Joost Andrae wrote:
please file an issue to the component www and sub component mailing list
regarding this problem.
Thanks for you advice.
It's #60817
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Andrew,
the outline view does stoff that neither
the navigator nor the document map can manage
Could you give an example of something Word's outliner can do that
navigator or the document map cannot do? I'm just trying to get a
handle on the differences as I haven't really used any of these
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Brown wrote:
Word 2003 has both an outliner and a Document map. The document map is
very similar to OOo's navigator; the outline view does stoff that neither
the navigator nor the document map can manage. Word's better, in other
words, at showing and manipulating the
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Brown wrote:
Word 2003 has both an outliner and a Document map. The document map
is very similar to OOo's navigator; the outline view does stoff that
neither the navigator nor the document map can manage. Word's better,
in other words, at showing and
Jonathon Blake wrote:
Chuck wrote:
In all seriousness, when was the last time you experienced corruption in a
compressed document?
About once a week for compressed files. Usually because of
transmission glitches.
As far as documents go, anytime I create a document with MSo, that
I've only had a few problems with corruption of compressed files, these
have been due to media failure. e.g. floppy disks over 8 years old,
Iomega zip disks over 6 and home-burned CDs over 14 months old.
Those last ones rather pissed me off. I bought some new CD-Rs and burned
some backups
Lars D. Noodén wrote:
I've only had a few problems with corruption of compressed files, these
have been due to media failure. e.g. floppy disks over 8 years old,
Iomega zip disks over 6 and home-burned CDs over 14 months old.
Those last ones rather pissed me off. I bought some new CD-Rs
Robin Laing wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Robin Laing wrote:
I don't use MSO so I cannot offer feature comparisons but I will say
that OOo will open MSO files that MSO won't open for some strange
reason. Even files that were just closed on the same desktop. I
have saved someones butt on more
That figure may have been for pressed CDs, not ones you burn. The ones
you burn only last a few years, tops, significantly less than tape.
Tape, when properly stored and actively maintained, can last up to 15
years.
I notice that the last week or so there was an article or two
quoting
On 1/19/06, Lars D. Noodén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That figure may have been for pressed CDs, not ones you burn. The ones
you burn only last a few years, tops, significantly less than tape.
Tape, when properly stored and actively maintained, can last up to 15
years.
That's not true. You
Chad Smith wrote:
SNIPPET
* Cross platform. Run it on Windows or Linux.
Thanks for not putting Mac on your list. Unless you count NeoOffice,
I wouldn't tell people OOo runs on Mac.
While I've used a Mac Mouse about three times in my life, Tiger desktop
and server have consistently
On 1/19/06, Paul Mirowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
SNIPPET
* Cross platform. Run it on Windows or Linux.
Thanks for not putting Mac on your list. Unless you count NeoOffice,
I wouldn't tell people OOo runs on Mac.
It's one thing to make it run faster, but
On 19 Jan 2006 at 12:22, Chad Smith wrote:
---clip---
And, btw, OOo X11 *doesn't* run on my Macs because I have Tiger, and OOo
won't work without X11 and I have been completely unable to install X11 on
my Mac. The only way I've been told to do it is with the install disc for
Tiger, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You don't work for Boeing do you? I have a couple of friends that work
at the Ridley PA location.
Chuck
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Chuck wrote:
In all seriousness, when was the last time you experienced corruption in
a compressed document?
On 1/19/06, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try this? It sounds like it will install optional part without
reinstalling the whole operating
system.
That did it. Thanks. I still think it's too much to ask someone to dig out
their install CD and go through all that (it took
Hi all,
If I am on the wrong list please advise of the correct site.
I am using OO.calc to convert an xls spreadsheet containing my groups'
on-call schedule to html format (it is much smaller this way) to post to
our web site.
Howver, even though when I print the spreadsheet the cell
Why not OpenOffice to Pocket pc, working in Windows Mobil
On 1/19/06, Fernando Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not OpenOffice to Pocket pc, working in Windows Mobil
Because we lack developers, but if you want to do it or hire someone for it
you are very welcomed.
--
Alexandro Colorado
Actually this is not an error. There is a delay in the mail aggregator
for OOo. It'll update itself approximately every 24 hours or so.
Rigel
On 1/19/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joost Andrae wrote:
please file an issue to the component www and sub component mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
