On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 11:33:00 AM +1000, Terry
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I missed that. There are two tabs on the Mail Reader - "Standard
> Display" and "Raw Display". The first is bad enough.
>
> Why publish any of this information?
1) Because there are legitimate uses which may save time
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 17:30:24 PM -0700, NoOp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >
> > In any case, it has NOTHING to do with OpenOffice, _reading_ email or
> > replies.
What I meant here is that if Jan is really pissed off that his IP
address is merrily distributed around the Inter
Hello everyone! Recently I added a couple of users to my Ubuntu Linux pc
and to my surprise, OpenOffice (all OOo applications) takes almost 3
minutes to start on these newly added users.
However, if I launch OpenOffice in my own user login, then it only takes
5 to 9 seconds.
While OpenOffic
It's problematic, whichever approach you use.
I was using gmane but have found the use of an email client more
convenient, using filters, a separate folder for each list and the
option to list emails by thread.
If you use gmane and change your email address, you have to resubscribe
to the li
Jim Ottaway wrote:
I have been using OpenOffice.org mostly because I have been doing lots
of editing work on files originally authored by others in MS Word,
Powerpoint, and Excel, which I have to return in their original file
formats. I use GNU/Linux, and OpenOffice.org appears to be the best
cho
Terry wrote:
>
> NoOp wrote:
>> M. Fioretti wrote:
>>
>>> In any case, it has NOTHING to do with OpenOffice, _reading_ email or
>>> replies. I have checked one of my messages in the same archive, and I
>>> see no equivalent information:
>>>
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=use
I missed that. There are two tabs on the Mail Reader - "Standard
Display" and "Raw Display". The first is bad enough.
Why publish any of this information? Surely it is the questions and
answers which are relevant. This is the reason I unsubscribed from
these lists previously.
Someone sug
M. Fioretti wrote:
>
> In any case, it has NOTHING to do with OpenOffice, _reading_ email or
> replies. I have checked one of my messages in the same archive, and I
> see no equivalent information:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=117127&raw=true
>
Really? Try:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Terry wrote:
I've now subscribed to that list. I take it that you are familiar with
it. What is the advantage of posting there rather than here? Can I
initiate a discussion?
I'm afraid that these "features@" lists in our proj
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:14 +0100, Jim Ottaway wrote:
> A prior question, I suppose, would be whether my lack of confidence is
> misplaced. I haven’t any empirical evidence of such problems, but, as
> I
> said, I am very risk-averse about losing time by having to re-do the
> edits in, for example,
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 16:06 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 09:11 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 02:06 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> >
> > > It may well be that we are only a few months or weeks away from the last
> > > "clean" version of OpenOffice.org's O
General note: giving meaningful subjects to email posted to public
lists greatly increases the number of people who will actually read
it. "Hi, I need you to fix..." is useless, I opened this message by
mistake, many other subscribers probably ignored it. Which is bad,
because the problem is real a
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:14:51 -0500, David G. Bradford, Sr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thursday, August 31, 2006
I am going to start using Open Office in the next couple of weeks. My 14
year old son will be using both Open Office and Gimp at the Battle Creek
Area Math and Science Center in Ba
13 matches
Mail list logo
