ot want it to take over and then make me
figure out how to get it to stop. At that point I would just uninstall
and stick with MSO.
Leave the dialog there, but make the text more understandable.
This was discussed before and an Issue was filed, I do believe. but I
cannot find it now.
Ja
Daniel Carrera wrote:
James Walker wrote:
Leave the dialog there, but make the text more understandable.
This was discussed before and an Issue was filed, I do believe. but I
cannot find it now.
If you feel this is important, please do find that issue. Or file a new one.
However, the UI
Daniel Carrera wrote:
James Walker wrote:
Line #1: Select the file types that are to be opened with OpenOffice.org
1.9.79
Line #2: OOo 1.9.79 will automatically open the following file types
This is what the dialog says now,Now no where in this does it say
that it is taking over from
Daniel Carrera wrote:
James Walker wrote:
This is saying that OOo can open files of type
No, it does not say "OOo can open these file types". What kind of a question would
that be? It says that those file types will be opened *automatically* in OOo.
But it does not sa
Cor Nouws wrote:
Tony Pursell wrote:
But on a more constructive note, my suggestion for the wording would be:
OOo 1.9.79 can be made the default application for opening the
following file types. This means that if you click on one of these
files, OOo will open it, not the Microsoft progam that o
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:35, Rod Engelsman wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Tony Pursell wrote:
I thought more was going to be done to avoid it and I am amazed that
we still have a setup dialog that virtually invites people to do what they
don't really want to do
t fix it so that there is not 2 issues for the same thing.) sorry.
should have kept reading before filing.
James Walker
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
evidence I can arrange your certification.
You could then put this in your sig.
Regards,
Now I feel left out, I never even thought of becoming an INGOT
assessor. I think it is time I went to the INGOT website and checked
that out. I want my Gold INGOT with distinction. :)
James Walker
Chad Smith wrote:
That's complete crap, Jonathon. I *use* an older version of MSO
*EVERYDAY* and it interacts just fine with files created on other
versions of MSO almost daily.
I don't know where you're getting your information, but from my
personal experience first hand, I can tell you that you
Does anyone know where I can download this version?
Thanks
James Walker
Central US MarCon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William W. Austin wrote:
On 2005-08-02 12:59:13, James Walker wrote:
Does anyone know where I can download this version?
I have it and can put it on a web page if you haven't found it
anywhere else. The link is *not* fast (128K upload to you), but if
you can't find it any
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/04/1234229&from=rss
If this is true, Talk about a major boost for OOo.
James Walker
Central US MarCon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
wrong? (no this is not a Sun bash, but
something that struck me as odd.)
James Walker
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard/g wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2005 10:17, James Walker wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the about box for OpenOffice.org
This product has been created by Sun Microsystems, based on
OpenOffice.org
I could see this being included in StarOffice, but since this is
the
Chad Smith wrote:
Yeah, exactly. How can OpenOffice.org be based on OpenOffice.org?
I can't believe it took James explaining it for y'all to get it.
-Chad Smith
Thank You Chad, I was starting to think no one was going to get it.
As I said, I am not trying to take away from what Sun has
ODF in their next release to show them that it is MS that
is not playing nicely with everyone else.
James Walker
Central US MarCon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Smith wrote:
On 10/27/05, Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS makes a "defacto" standard. It is not recognized as a standard.
It has not been submitted to any standards organization. It is not a
standard. ODF is being submitted to ISO, the same people that do the
ISO9000 standardi
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 17:35 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Thank you for demonstrating your inability to grasp basic concepts even
after they've been explained a dozen times to you.
Guys you are wasting your time. I have been working in education for 27
years and belei
(Multi-platform
software will have different issues for each platform)
How many are Linus build related issues, (something that is unique to
Linux software, I do not build my own copy of MSO.)
700 bugs seems like a small number when you consider all that OOo does
and all the platforms that it does it on.
James Walker
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:14 +, C Cichocki wrote:
Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
That's quite easy:
Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
C Cichocki wrote:
How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
Yes, pls!
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:06 -0500, James Walker wrote:
With all the discussions on "code bloat" wouldn't all of these Easter
Eggs add to that problem.
How much code do these things add to the overall size of OOo and will
removing them help bring that
Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd like to ask a second time : don't cut things out until we have
understanding about a way to make them available for those who wish
them.
This, I believe, is the gist of your argument, so I will respond to that
directly.
Someone in this thread said t
n rejected.
:-(
Best,
Is there something that needs to be done to get OOoExtras going again.
Maybe some one needs to check and see who was doing this and find out
what is up.
James Walker
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
og or just make it more
clear. but one of the two things needs to be done.
The dialog box is big enough to make the comment more verbose so that is
the option that I think we should go with and it should not take someone
very long to do it
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:55:00 -0500, James Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The dialog box is big enough to make the comment more verbose so that is
the option that I think we should go with and it should not take someone
very long to do it
Mathias Bauer wrote:
James Walker wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
I called the attention of our user experience specialists to this
thread. It's pretty late in the release cycle now, but let's see if the
text can be improved a bit (but don't expect us to explain how
Christian Einfeldt wrote:
Here are a couple of quotes from the Feb issue of Computer user mag.
FLOSS is their cover story. Their server is down now, so go to
this sister site:
http://www.kccomputeruser.com/
Here's a quote from "into the Great wide open" by Keith Mansfield:
"The most potentiall
Let's remember that this is a family friendly email list and watch the
language.
James Walker
Central US MarCon
Chad Smith wrote:
On 3/16/06, Rigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- if you are going to participate in this form of
communication you HAVE TO F'ING READ
Bruce,
Please see the homepage for OpenOffice.org 's
statement on the matter for the moment, I am sure there will be
more to follow shortly.
James Walker
Central US Marketing Contact
OpenOffice.org
Bruce Byfield wrote:
Anybody care to comment on this story:
http://news.zdne
+1
James Walker
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking for some that is good with base, their is a company
contacting me from Athens GA, USA
please email me if you would be interested in writing a database for
them, I will get additional details if anyone is interested.
James Walker
Central US MarCon
31 matches
Mail list logo
