Hi Marcin,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathias,
>>
>> one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not
>> seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and
>> the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for exa
Laurent Godard wrote:
> Hi
>
>> This is definitely a defect in the *process*, not in the statistics as I
>> consider it to be fair to track only those patches that developers can
>> spot easily.
>
> the defect is in teh process
I don't doubt that there is something wrong in spellchecker updatin
Hi
This is definitely a defect in the *process*, not in the statistics as I
consider it to be fair to track only those patches that developers can
spot easily.
the defect is in teh process
There is no structure to handle SpellChecker updates and i do it when time
Nicolas, if you want to manag
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Lun 5 mars 2007 16:15, Marcin Miłkowski a écrit :
>> Hi Mathias,
>>
>> one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not
>> seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and
>> the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a pa
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not
> seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and
> the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for example:
>
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issu
Le lundi 05 mars 2007 à 17:40 +0100, Marcin Miłkowski a écrit :
> > BTW WRT http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72724 : œ is
> > really different from o+e in french, you have words with œ and others with
> > o+e and you can't do a blanket replace
>
> But this is not about replacing. T
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If OO.o can't maintain those properly (handling patches...), there is a
problem
Well, some dictionaries aren't yet integrated into OOo official releases
due to a very slow license-checking process (for example, Polish
dictionary is LGPL, but it takes ages
Le Lun 5 mars 2007 16:15, Marcin Miłkowski a écrit :
> Hi Mathias,
>
> one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not
> seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and
> the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for
> example:
>
> ht
Hi Mathias,
one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not
seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and
the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for example:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72724
This is a p
