Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-25 Thread Alan Frayer
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote: To start on Linux we already have mature PIM apps such as Kontact and Evolution which are superior since you have a broader option of backends (Outlook you are tight to Exchange). While Evolution, you will have about 5 options for

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-25 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:23:52 -0400, Alan Frayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote: To start on Linux we already have mature PIM apps such as Kontact and Evolution which are superior since you have a broader option of backends (Outlook you are

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-23 Thread Cor Nouws
Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim that you can either run from a remote

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim that you can either run from a remote server or from within your

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Ian Lynch
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31 -0400, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:15:37 -0700 Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you.

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:06:51 -0400, Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
Sorry about the formatting in the last post, here is a cleaned up version there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:15:37 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:15:37 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Jonathon Blake
Andrew wrote: Because it appears that a project hasn't been started. a) You do realize that email integration was removed from OOo, don't you? b) You do realize that LAMP + OOo + Thunderbird + Firefox + the FLOSS version of Outlook (which is no longer being developed, because contrary to the

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:37:23 -0400, Jonathon Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) You do realize that LAMP + OOo + Thunderbird + Firefox + the FLOSS version of Outlook (which is no longer being developed, because contrary to the claims of the people that say they will switch from Outlook to

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Jonathon Blake
Alexandro wrote: What? I didnt get that at all. Can you clear your point. I'll rewrite that. a) There is a FLOSS equivalent to Outlook --- with all of the functions of outlook --- that is no longer being developed, because people were not using it; b) That OOo + several other currently

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-15 Thread CPHennessy
On Thu March 30 2006 21:46, + Rana, Rudresh wrote: [ MODERATED ] Hello, OpenOffice has almost all products in its Suite except one. Just the way MS-Outlook is available in MS-Office bundle, would OpenOffice too have something in the near future? Is something

[discuss] Email Tool

2006-03-30 Thread Rana, Rudresh
Hello, OpenOffice has almost all products in its Suite except one. Just the way MS-Outlook is available in MS-Office bundle, would OpenOffice too have something in the near future? Is something similar already in the pipeline? Kindly let me know. Thanks. Rudresh J. Rana System

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-03-30 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:46:58 -0600, Rana, Rudresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, OpenOffice has almost all products in its Suite except one. Just the way MS-Outlook is available in MS-Office bundle, would OpenOffice too have something in the near future? Is something similar already in