Chad Smith wrote:
On 10/27/05, cono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw a message from you passing swifty to my bin ;-) You wrote that you
do indeed support OOo. Well, no doubt about that from me.
As I see your role: you want to prevent people from being to naive,
eye-shelved, optimistic, unrea
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 15:31 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
> I also get upset (since you claimed that is what I do) by people constantly
> claiming I have some sort of learning disability,
The solution is simple, Chad, demonstrate to all those people that you
haven't.
--
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Smith wrote:
I also get upset (since you claimed that is what I do) by people constantly
claiming I have some sort of learning disability,
Well, you are, to be honest, very very dogmatic. Regardless of the
reason, you hardly ever recognize an opposing point of view. And the
message you
On 10/27/05, cono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I saw a message from you passing swifty to my bin ;-) You wrote that you
> do indeed support OOo. Well, no doubt about that from me.
>
> As I see your role: you want to prevent people from being to naive,
> eye-shelved, optimistic, unrealistic etc.
Hi Chad,
cono wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
success as important to OOo's success. If you can't be construct
On 10/27/05, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I didn't realize there was a free trial of JAWS!
>
> What speed CPU do you have? How much RAM?
Athlon 2700+ 512MB
--
Adam Moore
Founding Member
http://www.opendocumentfellowship.org
---
Adam Moore wrote:
Has anyone on this list tested screen readers like
JAWS with OpenOffice 2.0 to verify whether the complains
in the two messages I linked to are still real?
What are the real system requirements?
Can someone find out and update http://ui.openoffice.org/accessibility/at.html ?
I
On 10/26/05, Adam Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I decided to download the JAWS software and try it out on openoffice.
> I then compared it with MS Excel and it read pretty much the same way.
> Their were a couple of differences.
>
> 1) When you click on an item in the toolbar of excel it rea
On 10/26/05, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone on this list tested screen readers like
> JAWS with OpenOffice 2.0 to verify whether the complains
> in the two messages I linked to are still real?
> What are the real system requirements?
> Can someone find out and update
> http://ui
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:22 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
> And, if ODF is so all consuming, why would you *want* Microsoft to support
> it? If ODF is all that matters about OOo, as soon as MSO supports it, OOo is
> dead, right? I mean, if ODF success is the only key to OOo success - then if
> MSO has i
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
success as important to OOo's success. If you can't be constructive in
supporting this y
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 10:55:50 AM -0400, Chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I don't think "non IT-savvy citizens" give a hoot about this issue
> and would probably look at you funny if you tried to hand out
> fliers. :-(
By this line of reasoning, it's hard to see why one should bother to
use or k
I think what needs brought to these few politicians attention is the
fact that MS was a member of OASIS and then when everyone decided to go
to the file format that OASIS adopted and passed, they backed away from
it and went their own way.
It needs pointed out to them that ODF is not shutting
On 10/26/05, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
>
> You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
> seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
> success as important to OOo's success. If you c
On 10/26/05, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If MS support ODF it isn't an issue as this would be a good sales
> proposition for sticking with MS Office even if it and OOo have
> interchangeable files. If MS don't support ODF and the community,
> including the big companies ensure that OOo
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 07:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Has anyone on this list tested screen readers like
> JAWS with OpenOffice 2.0 to verify whether the complains
> in the two messages I linked to are still real?
> What are the real system requirements?
> Can someone find out and update
> http:/
Anybody who goes to this meeting will think it's important. Just
because it's not on the grand scale doesn't mean people don't think
it's important. If someone was to hand out fliers it would be for the
specific meeting not around town.
On 10/26/05, Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't th
Marco Fioretti wrote:
>>Any Massachussetts registered voters could help out by contacting
>>their governor, secretary of state and their representative in the
>>state senate regarding this issue:
>> http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/25/HNstateopendoc_1.html
>>
>>It would be useful to pi
On 10/26/05, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The article
>
> http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/25/galvin_attacks_software_proposal
> says that blind office workers are saying they're worried they won't be
> able to use it. I looked into this a bit.
>
Has anyone on
Lars wrote:
> It would be useful to pin down the sources and specifics of the basis for
> Pacheco's claims. (e.g. which disability groups and what have they been
> made upset about)
The article
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/25/galvin_attacks_software_proposal
says th
20 matches
Mail list logo
