Daniel Carrera wrote:
cono wrote:
The one who writes
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft
Office - you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
should be fully aware that people using the Ms version of Office,
shall expect that thay can just work as they
Quoting cono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Bruce Bowler wrote:
Quoting from http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html
OpenOffice.org 1.1 gives you everything you'd expect in office software.
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office -
you'll be
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Quoting cono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The one who writes
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office
- you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
should be fully aware that people using the Ms version of Office, shall
expect that thay
Quoting cono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Quoting cono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The one who writes
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office
- you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
should be fully aware that people using the Ms version
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
That's exactly my point, the difference is that a simple user will feel
right at
home in OOo. A power user will actually have to relearn some of the most
higher
end tools. So the problems really depend on the user. [...]
with no hassle and thats the whole point.
Quoting cono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
That's exactly my point, the difference is that a simple user will
feel right at
home in OOo. A power user will actually have to relearn some of the
most higher
end tools. So the problems really depend on the user. [...]
with no
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
So if it's about feelings we don't really need to pay more attention on
words
since feelings are completely different message.
Of course I do agree that feelings are personal. And that people are not
realistic, when they expect to have a copy of the
cono wrote:
Hi Alexandro,
Wonderful! And/or lucky?
I did have some trouble at some points, just to find my way. And I know
I´m not the only one. Not the fault of OOo, of course.
I hadn't any migration problems at all. Then again, I didn't have a
migration per se. I was never an MS Office
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:54:31 +0100, Tony Pursell wrote:
On 6 Jul 2005 at 3:25, Greg Bulmash wrote:
Mail Merge: With Microsoft it's simple. Create a table or spreadsheet,
use the first row as headers, and then just punch in the data in the
following rows. The headers are taken as field
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Please see http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51638
and help get this integrated.
my two votes
--
Cor Nouws
http://www.nouenoff.nl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:11:53 +0300, Alexandro Colorado put fingers to
keyboard and said:
Hi Greg, please understand that openoffice.org is **NOT** a MSO clone. That
means that no, we won't have all the features, neither are we thinking on
implementing them. Also means that we think about
Quoting Bruce Bowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:11:53 +0300, Alexandro Colorado put fingers to
keyboard and said:
Hi Greg, please understand that openoffice.org is **NOT** a MSO clone. That
means that no, we won't have all the features, neither are we thinking on
implementing
Bruce Bowler wrote:
Quoting from http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html
OpenOffice.org 1.1 gives you everything you'd expect in office software.
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office -
you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
Either of
Quoting Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bruce Bowler wrote:
Quoting from http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html
OpenOffice.org 1.1 gives you everything you'd expect in office software.
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office -
you'll be completely at
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Bruce Bowler wrote:
Quoting from http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html
OpenOffice.org 1.1 gives you everything you'd expect in office
software.
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office -
you'll be completely at home with
cono wrote:
The one who writes
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office
- you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
should be fully aware that people using the Ms version of Office, shall
expect that thay can just work as they are used to do.
When I
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 18:33 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
cono wrote:
The one who writes
If you're used to using other office suites - such as Microsoft Office
- you'll be completely at home with OpenOffice.org 1.1.
should be fully aware that people using the Ms version of Office, shall
Bruce wrote:
OpenOffice.org 1.1 gives you everything you'd expect in office software.
So what do you expect in an Office Suite:
i) Database functionality;
ii) Spreadsheet functionality;;
iii) Word Processing functionality;
iv) Graphics functionality;
v) Contact Management functionality;
vi)
Sorry, I didn't realize that I could schedule work shifts
for 500 people using Outlook When did they add that capability?
Planner is a neat GPL Gantt chart and resource allocation app
It's available under Gnome and there is a pretty complete windows port
It looks like a good alternative for
On 7/7/05, Jonathon Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i) Database functionality; Included
Going along with your you have to install Outlook line of reasoning
- you have to install *Java* for the Database to work.
vii) Presentation creation/editing; Included
So Impress does presentations, but
Chad Smith wrote:
Going along with your you have to install Outlook line of reasoning
- you have to install *Java* for the Database to work.
No you don't. You can use dBase without Java or any addons.
It seems to me that MSO has more includes than OOo, once you include
Outlook, which is a
21 matches
Mail list logo
