Previous thread:
https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003393.html
I'd like to propose that we spend $200 to reserve the two t1.micro instances
in that proposal for the purpose of web servers.
Our current AWS expenditure is still ~$80/mo. Spending $200 up front will
reduce that bi
WAT?
first you said it was $1.60
Then $16.40
Now it's $123.10
?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Torrie Fischer wrote:
> Previous thread:
>
> https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003393.html
>
> I'd like to propose that we spend $200 to reserve the two t1.micro
> instances
> in
I agree with Andrew,
I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to evaluate
the needs of the infrastructure.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Buczko wrote:
> WAT?
>
> first you said it was $1.60
> Then $16.40
> Now it's $123.10
>
> ?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:0
On Monday, March 03, 2014 11:33:37 Andrew Buczko wrote:
> WAT?
>
> first you said it was $1.60
> Then $16.40
> Now it's $123.10
Erm, where are you getting those numbers from?
This proposal is essentially only a small portion of the original suggestion.
Instead of buying all two t1.micro, and th
On Monday, March 03, 2014 11:35:51 Justin Herman wrote:
> I agree with Andrew,
>
> I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to evaluate
> the needs of the infrastructure.
If you've got "several concerns", what are those concerns? I too can claim to
be "concerned" about somet
I'm sorry, but I'm siding with Torrie on this one.
On 3/3/2014 11:35 AM, Justin Herman wrote:
> I agree with Andrew,
>
> I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to
> evaluate the needs of the infrastructure.
The purpose of bringing up proposals on the discuss list is so that
or, if it's $200 and you know for a fact the space needs it right now, just
grudgingly buy it and hold mild anger towards those that said it wasn't
needed (sorry, in a mood). Unless (crosses fingers) this is meant as a way
to test a new, functional system for the space approving purchases, if so:
On Monday, March 03, 2014 12:05:08 Craig Bergdorf wrote:
> or, if it's $200 and you know for a fact the space needs it right now, just
> grudgingly buy it and hold mild anger towards those that said it wasn't
> needed (sorry, in a mood). Unless (crosses fingers) this is meant as a way
> to test a
My question is why no other options viable for hosting?
Why MUST we use AWS? Why do we need 99.99 availability for 6 servers? Why
could we not hybrid the design (like Craig said) and use some local hosting
and some AWS?
Hardware is cheap and easy to come by. Hosting our own allows us to have a
TO
As far as reimbursement and membership credit I have submitted them.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Justin Herman wrote:
> My question is why no other options viable for hosting?
>
> Why MUST we use AWS? Why do we need 99.99 availability for 6 servers? Why
> could we not hybrid the design (li
On Monday, March 03, 2014 12:27:50 Torrie Fischer wrote:
> On Monday, March 03, 2014 12:05:08 Craig Bergdorf wrote:
> > or, if it's $200 and you know for a fact the space needs it right now,
> > just
> > grudgingly buy it and hold mild anger towards those that said it wasn't
> > needed (sorry, in a
On Monday, March 03, 2014 12:31:51 Justin Herman wrote:
> My question is why no other options viable for hosting?
It isn't just about hosting our website.
SYNHAK.org is a playground for people who want to build a hackerspace's online
infrastructure. If you're against that, I'd be happy to ramp u
On Monday, March 03, 2014 12:32:48 Justin Herman wrote:
> As far as reimbursement and membership credit I have submitted them.
*nod*
Its in my backlog.
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Justin Herman wrote:
> > My question is why no other options viable for hosting?
> >
> > Why MUST we use
TWC is inherently bad in this region. Although a specific study has not
yet been done at 48, I'll bet you a panda once the basement is built up a
bit more and one is run it will fail. packet loss, inconsistent speeds,
random outages, the whole deal. A single (especially docsis) connection to
the
On Monday, March 03, 2014 13:03:44 Craig Bergdorf wrote:
> TWC is inherently bad in this region. Although a specific study has not
> yet been done at 48, I'll bet you a panda once the basement is built up a
> bit more and one is run it will fail. packet loss, inconsistent speeds,
> random outages
SynHak.org needs to be multiple things. A "playground" maybe should not be
what we use it for. I don't use the plumbing or electric as a "playground"
they are infrastructure. They are constructs.
Instead of asking why AWS is the best, I should have asked what are the
goals?
As far as physical sec
IDEA: It might be smart to talk to other hackerspaces and see if they would
act as an encrypted backup for us if we do the same.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Justin Herman wrote:
> SynHak.org needs to be multiple things. A "playground" maybe should not be
> what we use it for. I don't use th
On Monday, March 03, 2014 13:24:14 Justin Herman wrote:
> SynHak.org needs to be multiple things. A "playground" maybe should not be
> what we use it for. I don't use the plumbing or electric as a "playground"
> they are infrastructure. They are constructs.
Oh ok. I'll stop listening then if thats
Torrie,
I would appreciate it if you could refrain from treating me like I am
attacking you.
I am not your enemy. I see things differently than you BUT I respect your
point of view. I expect that you do the same. You *don't* have to agree
with me.* I expect you to "Be excellent to each other." *I
Justin: linking to the collective via vpn has been on my todo list for 6
months now. I'm waiting on a discussion on our ISP. Considering it's
available for little to none additional $/mo I would like to have native
ipv6 and a dedicated ip for outside vpn connections if for no other reason
than to
On 3/3/2014 12:31 PM, Justin Herman wrote:
> My question is why no other options viable for hosting?
No one has said that there are no other viable options for hosting.
>
> Why MUST we use AWS? Why do we need 99.99 availability for 6 servers?
> Why could we not hybrid the design (like Craig said)
http://i.imgur.com/DvXWk.gif
How about we just discuss this in person. Get some ideas together and draw out
a plan. In all honesty we wanted to raise member fees so we can support the
space. How about we get more member and create less drama on the discuss
thread and meetings. Let's get so
I think Alex Idea is a GREAT one.
I will bring documentation and pricing.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:33 PM, alex kot wrote:
> http://i.imgur.com/DvXWk.gif
>
> How about we just discuss this in person. Get some ideas together and
> draw out a plan. In all honesty we wanted to raise member fees
Ok
Thanks Chris, that makes more sense when you say it that way.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Chris Egeland wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I'm siding with Torrie on this one.
>
>
> On 3/3/2014 11:35 AM, Justin Herman wrote:
>
> I agree with Andrew,
>
> I hold several concerns about this proposal
Torrie,
I don't have time to read your "novels". Please keep your post simple and
to the point.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Buczko wrote:
> Ok
> Thanks Chris, that makes more sense when you say it that way.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Chris Egeland wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry,
On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 04:30:46 Andrew Buczko wrote:
> Torrie,
>
> I don't have time to read your "novels". Please keep your post simple and
> to the point.
I do realize that I write a lot and try to work towards smaller e-mails that
still contain the important details. I also find it imposs
As far as the proposal at hand, what Torrie is proposing is that we reduce
our expenses on infrastructure we're already using by purchasing it ahead
of time. Currently we're doing a pay as you go on our AWS instances, this
could potentially lead to a high bill if one month sees much higher traffic
On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 09:32:18 Omar Rassi wrote:
> As far as the proposal at hand, what Torrie is proposing is that we reduce
> our expenses on infrastructure we're already using by purchasing it ahead
> of time. Currently we're doing a pay as you go on our AWS instances, this
> could potentia
28 matches
Mail list logo
