> On 17 Dec 2023, at 14:20, Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> The only version which is not up to date on repo.gnustep.ch is currently
> Ubuntu22 on Intel as I run into a strange error with configure of
> gnustep-base as it does not want to detect my libiconv-1.17 version for some
> reason. The
btw - I'm not associated with helloSystem other than as a user.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 2:56 PM bruce wrote:
> I've tried using libobjc2 with the other runtimes from the linux repo. I
> couldn't get it to work, but it sounds like other people have under certain
> circumstances.
> Hm, I'll give
I've tried using libobjc2 with the other runtimes from the linux repo. I
couldn't get it to work, but it sounds like other people have under certain
circumstances.
Hm, I'll give that a try,.
But to build a product, I want to know that my users can install it without
all the monkey business.
Bruce,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 8:43 AM bruce wrote:
> That's the version of Obj-C. Linux is stuck on 1.9. Obj-c 2.0 released in
> 2006, as I'm sure you are aware.
>
I am using 2.x on my Debian Linux 12 install here, but then again I am
building from source.
I can use this build
Bruce,
GNUStep supports Ojbc2.0 with libobjc2.0 and clang but the versions packaged
with Debian or Ubuntu are compiled with the old runtime.
https://repo.gnustep.ch/ can help you to install "gnustep2" which pulls in
versions compiled with clang and libobjc2.
I use this combination since years
That's the version of Obj-C. Linux is stuck on 1.9. Obj-c 2.0 released in
2006, as I'm sure you are aware.
I can use this build https://github.com/plaurent/gnustep-build to create
2.1 on Linux. The FeeBSD is stuck at 2.0, as they no longer have a
maintainer of their gnustep port.
On Sun, Dec 17,
Bruce,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 7:57 AM bruce wrote:
> Something clicked (about 3 this morning) about version 1.9. I’ve assumed
> this was the version in the Linux repos due to their typical bureaucracy.
> But more research tells me that 2.1 cannot compile using gcc. I never
> choose gcc myself.
Bruce,
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 8:23 PM bruce wrote:
> Yes, I’ve tried that. It doesn’t look good on any of the themes I’ve
> found. I’d try making my own theme if I could find documentation…
>
>
>
There are a number of examples in the github repository as well as
documentation in gnustep-gui's
Something clicked (about 3 this morning) about version 1.9. I’ve assumed
this was the version in the Linux repos due to their typical bureaucracy.
But more research tells me that 2.1 cannot compile using gcc. I never
choose gcc myself. But the linux repo maintenance tools such as Launchpad
depend
