Hi Everyone,
I've been doing some prototyping with django to see how good of a fit
it will be for an upcoming project, and would like to run an idea past
you guys. I'll try and explain my situation first, and then ask the
question afterward.
At a very high level, I have an application, which hol
On May 29, 12:21 am, "Honza Král" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We had some discussions during PyCon in Chicago, the biggest issue we
> have with the hooks is the amount of code needed to change the widgets
>
> we talked with Joseph about something like widget-sets, a mapping prom
> either field, o
We had some discussions during PyCon in Chicago, the biggest issue we
have with the hooks is the amount of code needed to change the widgets
we talked with Joseph about something like widget-sets, a mapping prom
either field, or perhaps field type to widgets, that could be easily
defined - the sim
Today it may be empty, but tomorrow there can appear some useful code.
So I think its better to follow that style.
On May 29, 12:57 am, "Leo Soto M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see that almost all Field subclasses which implements
> get_db_prep_save end calling Field.get_db_prep_save anyway.
I see that almost all Field subclasses which implements
get_db_prep_save end calling Field.get_db_prep_save anyway. That's
curious, because Field.get_db_prep_save is a no-op.
Is it just some OOP style which we want to keep?
--
Leo Soto M.
http://blog.leosoto.com
--~--~-~--~~---
Sigh.
In [7555] I added a warning to the flatpages docs to hopefully silence
this issue once and for all. Note that I did this not because I feel
it's necessary or appropriate, but because I'm just getting really,
really, really tired of people complaining about this. Can we please
let this one g
I just read over
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3335
and want to confirm a suspension that I would like to add to that 'thread' in
an
attempt to keep it closed:
404 processing happens, then the flat-pages code is given a chance to override
it. This means that if the 404 processing fails
We (GCap, large commercial radio company in the UK) have been
developing against the newforms-admin branch for a few months now, and
based on that experience I have a number of suggestions for simple
hooks that could be added to make it easier to customise.
1. Provide a custom template for a chan
Usage questions belong on django-users - this list is for the development of
django itself.
--
Collin Grady
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send em
Seems you've done a bit of duplicate work. If you're in Textmate, try going
to Text>Convert>Spaces to Tabs (or) Tabs to Spaces
Should do what your script does, I think.
-justin
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Daniel Bushman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I use Textmate (with the Django bundle
I use Textmate (with the Django bundle) and soft-tabs. Sometimes If I
paste code from the web there are indentation problems. Here's what
I use for quick clean-up:
* search for [tab] and replace with [4 spaces] (using soft-tabs)
I recorded a macro which does "select all" and then performs thi
> Should I be looking at any other documentation, or code, that you are
> developing?
Yes. What you have brought up is actually not the use case for
formsets. However, you do bring up something that makes me want to
clarify in the docs a bit more. When I say multiple forms per page,
that reall
On 2008-05-27 05:33:01 -0600, "Russell Keith-Magee"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Is there any particular reason that you can't just add a Meta class to
> this class definition, in the same way that a ModelForm works:
>
> class ArticleFormSet(FormSet)
> class Meta:
> form = ArticleFor
>
> Providing a way to count different fields is a good idea, and the
> approach you've described looks good to me. I just wanted to make sure
> that the simplest case (count all instances) is trivial (i.e., doesn't
> require explicit naming of the PK field).
>
This is fixed in the latest revisio
Thanks a lot for the good work. A newbie here, and have a question on
the comment model.
Isn't it cleaner to look at the threaded comments in another way, e.g.,
if comment B is a reply to comment A, then the content_object of B is
simply A instead of the original content object a comment is at
i would use it as well.
i was actually thinking how on earth could i simplify the same thing i
do for every single project
(splitting settings.py to allow for revision control, splitting
urls.py, etc.)
On May 27, 8:30 am, "Valts Mazurs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This one sounds like a
another gigantic +1
On May 26, 8:51 am, rcs_comp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 26, 6:27 am, Jonas Pfeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also not Django specific but support for Markdown Extra would be super-
> > cool:
>
> >http://michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/extra/
>
> Big +1!
--~--~-
the code in the signals.py is like --
-
from django.core.mail import send_mass_mail
from django.template import Context, loader
from ravi_admin.admin.models import Post
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: ravindra goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, May 28, 200
On 22 mei, 18:28, "Ben Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've now re-applied Daryls patch (which was against qsrf) to a clone of
> django trunk in a mercurial repo. It's available
> athttp://hg.woe-beti.deandthere's a trac set up for it
> athttp://trac.woe-beti.de. Feel free to make
http://www.mercurytide.co.uk/whitepapers/django-signals/
according to the documents in above URL i am trying to implement signals in
django.
but getting the following error
--cannot import name Post
please help me out how to include this Post signal in the model
20 matches
Mail list logo
