Joost Cassee wrote:
> Thanks for all the great info. Usually articles refer ''.join(...) as
> the fastest concat operation, but it won't do type coersion of course.
> I was interested whether there was a Django standard for this sort of
> thing. In any case the '+' operator is discouraged by
Quick note: Malcolm and I are in Portland in the only place in the
city sans wifi. We've talked about this and the other exc swallowing
issue and I have some thoughts. Please hold until I'm in a more
civilized location and can actually use a keyboard bigger than a few
stamps.
Jacob
Sent
On Aug 24, 4:40 am, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:43 PM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8221 was closed as duplicate of
> > #7524, which it is not.
>
> In triaging, I'm trying to take the position that all of the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand this argument. At some point fixing this general issue
> is going to have to involve a piecemeal change of each instance where
> exceptions are currently swallowed. (Or at least each instance where the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Jonas Pfeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S.: I should have brought this up here earlier instead of causing a
> somewhat lengthy discussion on IRC, sorry for that. I hope James
> doesn't hate me after this ;)
I stand by what I said in the dev channel yesterday:
