Re: contrib.auth tests

2008-08-26 Thread Cam MacRae
On Aug 27, 1:42 pm, Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use > contrib.auth without requiring passwords which invalidates a ton of > urls hooked into contrib.auth.urls - this means that all the tests > fail. In this case they'd fail irrespective of the templates, no? > I would

Re: contrib.auth tests

2008-08-26 Thread Cam MacRae
On Aug 27, 11:20 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I much prefer self-contained unittests. I read Russell's mail as > preferring to trade that for installation/configuration testing. I don't > particularly agree with that, but I could live with it if we decide it's > the way we

Re: what's wrong with the djangoadmin tool of mine

2008-08-26 Thread Karen Tracey
Please ask usage questions on django-users, not here. This list is for discussion of developing Django itself, not using it. Karen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post

Re: Exception swallowing in urls.py + admin.autodiscover() == a lot of frustration for developers

2008-08-26 Thread Karen Tracey
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I think we need to do something along the lines of what's in > #7524... it's far, far from perfect, but it's probably the only way to > go to avoid a lot of frustration. > > So should #7524 get moved back to a 1.0

Re: Exception swallowing in urls.py + admin.autodiscover() == a lot of frustration for developers

2008-08-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's a couple of days later...got time to update with your thoughts? Yeah, I'm sorry; I lost track of this. Essentially I think that James is right that a systematic fix would be better, but I don't see what that

Re: Exception swallowing in urls.py + admin.autodiscover() == a lot of frustration for developers

2008-08-26 Thread Karen Tracey
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quick note: Malcolm and I are in Portland in the only place in the > city sans wifi. We've talked about this and the other exc swallowing > issue and I have some thoughts. Please hold until I'm in a more >

Re: request_started signal

2008-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the reply. You are of course right. I should just do my processing of urlconf whenever when it is needed, and leave caching to some future optimisation. Even so; Given your definition of the signal, how come the BUILD_RULES is output after the request log line, is that just a

Re: request_started signal

2008-08-26 Thread James Bennett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some code for processing the urlsconf so signals seems like the > obvious tool. Apparently there is on server_started signal firing when > configuration is complete(that would be a very nice signal to get into

request_started signal

2008-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is seems that request_started & request_finished are used by the db to manage connections, so I would expect it to work as defined. I have some code for processing the urlsconf so signals seems like the obvious tool. Apparently there is on server_started signal firing when configuration is

Re: Beef with Django; admin and auth

2008-08-26 Thread Jeff
I'm quite new to django, so I'm not sure where to put that patch. I tried it in settings.py and urls.py but it didn't affect anything. Where's the correct place to put it? Thanks On Aug 15, 1:14 am, Julien Phalip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > So far I haven't had too much trouble

Re: old docs not opening

2008-08-26 Thread James Bennett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giving 404. Known issue or I should file a bug? Due to limitations of the old docs system, there are quite a few such links (typically due to documentation which existed in one release but not in another). There's no

old docs not opening

2008-08-26 Thread Amit Upadhyay
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/0.96/pagination/ Giving 404. Known issue or I should file a bug? -- Amit Upadhyay Vakow! www.vakow.com +91-9820-295-512 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: validator_list still in docs

2008-08-26 Thread James Bennett
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Michael Hrivnak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is neither a direct nor indirect replacement for model-level validation. > Many applications receive input from sources other than forms. Validation at > the form and model level are both valuable, but for