Sorry guys new to this place.:).thanks for da pointers
On May 13, 12:49 pm, Justin Lilly wrote:
> Take this question to django-users please. Also, check out marty
> alchin's pro django foe this snippet.
>
> -justin
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 3:36 AM, kailash
On May 12, 2009, at 13:24, J. Clifford Dyer wrote:
> I don't see this as a necessary requirement for all patches. What if
> the patch has nothing but tests in it, and is improving something that
> was sub-optimal or missing altogether in the test code.
I'm sure you can find 99
Hi Hendrique,
On Wed, May 13, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> Even if this can't or doesn't seem right to be done on the current
> state of Django, I would be grateful for some advice on improving the
> patch to implement the desired behavior - it's a really needed
> feature.
you're probably not aware
On May 13, 6:12 pm, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi Hendrique,
>
> On Wed, May 13, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> > Even if this can't or doesn't seem right to be done on the current
> > state of Django, I would be grateful for some advice on improving the
> > patch to implement the desired
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:31 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:40 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> > [...] but it occurs to me that if through=MyModel is set on the
> > ManyToMany, the sequence on MyModel will already be handled by the loop
> > at line 112. I think I can code
On May 13, 5:27 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 13:14 -0700, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> > I tried both reopening [1] and filling a new ticket [2], but looks
> > like I'm doing it the wrong way as they kept being closed. So here I
> > come asking for
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 13:14 -0700, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> I tried both reopening [1] and filling a new ticket [2], but looks
> like I'm doing it the wrong way as they kept being closed. So here I
> come asking for help on the list.
The reason in both cases was explained in the tickets (and in
I tried both reopening [1] and filling a new ticket [2], but looks
like I'm doing it the wrong way as they kept being closed. So here I
come asking for help on the list.
On syncdb, contrib.auth will create default permissions for each model
you have (add, change, delete). But the permission
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:40 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 12:49 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> > Setup:
> >
> > Ubuntu 9.04
> > Python 2.6.2
> > Django 1.0.2
> > Postgres 8.3.7
> > postgresql-psycopg2
> >
> > I'm having issues using ./manage.py syncdb and ./manage.py flush
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 12:49 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> Setup:
>
> Ubuntu 9.04
> Python 2.6.2
> Django 1.0.2
> Postgres 8.3.7
> postgresql-psycopg2
>
> I'm having issues using ./manage.py syncdb and ./manage.py flush with a
> project of mine. I've got an app, venues, which defines a
>
On Wed, May 13, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> Thanks for raising attention on this feature, I wasn't aware of your
> "Model Validation" branch and GSOC project.
>
> One question: I'm afraid of the implications of coupling validation to
> models instead of the actual solution (Form/ModelForm). Coupling
On May 12, 9:28 pm, Honza Král wrote:
> Hi,
> last week I was busy during EuroDjangoCon, so I am afraid there was
> close to no progress on actual work. I did however give a talk on the
> topic (see slides at [0]) and got into a few interesting discussions.
> As a result of
Setup:
Ubuntu 9.04
Python 2.6.2
Django 1.0.2
Postgres 8.3.7
postgresql-psycopg2
I'm having issues using ./manage.py syncdb and ./manage.py flush with a
project of mine. I've got an app, venues, which defines a
ManyToManyField.
After syncdb loads the fixtures, (and only if it tries to load
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:36 AM, julianb wrote:
> Since the ticket is one year old, that time had come and passed.
The ticket's age is irrelevant. *right this minute*, everyone is
focused on 1.1, so making a design decision for this ticket is not
important right now.
Once
Take this question to django-users please. Also, check out marty
alchin's pro django foe this snippet.
-justin
On May 13, 2009, at 3:36 AM, kailash wrote:
>
> Hi,
>Just want to know is there any way of tracking the history in the
> database of a model.
> Like..every
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 08:36:33 kailash wrote:
> Hi,
> Just want to know is there any way of tracking the history in
> the database of a model.
> Like..every time i update a row using model.save() , the data that
> previously existed gets recorded into any table???
> If there's any such
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ankit wrote:
>
> how can i customise list_filter option.
>
> In my Django model I have a field called status which can have three
> choices
> 1)activated
> 2)rejected
> 3)pending
>
>
>
> I am using status in list_filter.By default it shows
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM, kailash wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Just want to know is there any way of tracking the history in the
> database of a model.
> Like..every time i update a row using model.save() , the data that
> previously existed gets recorded into any table???
> If
how can i customise list_filter option.
In my Django model I have a field called status which can have three
choices
1)activated
2)rejected
3)pending
I am using status in list_filter.By default it shows me the 'ALL' but
i want to set default to pending.
Hi,
Just want to know is there any way of tracking the history in the
database of a model.
Like..every time i update a row using model.save() , the data that
previously existed gets recorded into any table???
If there's any such functionality please let me know..because the
module i've
On May 13, 2:56 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> We need to wait until we're not trying to get v1.1 out the door.
Since the ticket is one year old, that time had come and passed.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
21 matches
Mail list logo