Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hi Manav. Welcome aboard! 🙂 On Thursday, 20 May 2021, Manav Agarwal wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am so very thankful to everyone who helped me out with my project idea > and proposal. The proposal is accepted and I will give my best to > accomplish as I have promised. > On Thursday, April 8, 202

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hello everyone, I am so very thankful to everyone who helped me out with my project idea and proposal. The proposal is accepted and I will give my best to accomplish as I have promised. On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 7:17:58 AM UTC+5:30 Manav Agarwal wrote: > Hey Carlton. > > I have submitted the

Re: GSOC Proposal : A new AUTH library.

t mean its not a worthwhile project or GSOC proposal, its just a fact of software design and planning. D On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 06:32, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi Nikhil, > > I am not calling the shots here, just a member of the community. > However, if you are suggesting this a

Re: GSOC Proposal : A new AUTH library.

Hi Nikhil, I am not calling the shots here, just a member of the community. However, if you are suggesting this as a work on a 3rd-party library, I think your suggestion should be either for something completely new, or a significant improvement over existing 3rd-party libraries. Libraries which

Re: GSOC Proposal : A new AUTH library.

Just throwing another idea into the pile whilst we're here. For a long time I've felt we could more easily support a lot more use cases if we separated Authentication from Authorization. The simplest path for this would be to separate credentials (username, password) from the User record. This

Re: GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hi Anuttam — If you're happy I'd submit. I'm afraid I don't have capacity to pre-review before the deadline here. Good luck. Kind Regards, Carlton On Monday, 12 April 2021 at 08:27:12 UTC+2 anutta...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey , > Can anyone please let me know if I have to include other things

Re: GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hey , Can anyone please let me know if I have to include other things for my final proposal or should I submit ? Thanks. On Thu, 8 Apr, 2021, 8:58 am Anuttam Anand, wrote: > Hey Carton , > I have made my final proposal , please let me know for any additional > points or advice. > Google Docs Lin

GSOC Proposal : A new AUTH library.

Hello, I am Nikhil Muddamsetty and I want to add a new AUTH library with the following features. 1 > Custom user model to support phone-number or email or username or a combination of any of these three. 2 > Traditional Account signup and login 3 > Email verification for traditional signup.

Re: GSOC Proposal : Adding a Redis cache backend to Core

Hello Daniyal, > I want to move ahead with using the pickle module. However, does it seem necessary to add support for other serializers ( json / yaml / msgpack ) as well? I don't think that adding support for configurable serialization is necessary for this project. Don't get me wrong, I thin

Re: GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hey Carton , I have made my final proposal , please let me know for any additional points or advice. Google Docs Link : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HPi0hI3BlVRuUiq2JPxKxm_jnGwjfqhCczWaDHUWhSE/edit?usp=sharing On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 10:16:26 PM UTC+5:30 Anuttam Anand wrote: > Hey

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hey Carlton. I have submitted the proposal. Also, Your suggestion of adding tests with the introduction of a new central registry seems great and I have implemented the same in phase 1. Also, I already added all the points suggested by Simon Charette from the discussion( https://groups.google.com/

Re: GSOC Proposal : Adding a Redis cache backend to Core

Hi Since redis does not support complex objects, we need to serialize the data into a suitable format. Most third-party libraries use either the pickle module, to serialize the values or use json / yaml serializers. I want to move ahead with using the pickle module. However, does it seem necessary

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hi Manav. You should definitely submit. Your proposal is quite detailed, so I'd need to sit down with it more fully than I have time to comment on this week. (But that's OK — even if your implementation idea needs revision, THAT you've considered it is important.) Having said that: * You h

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Thank You Carlton for the feedback. As per your suggestion, I have increased the clarity of the proposal with some code and implementation. I will try to maximize the clarity as much as possible. Till then, May you please suggest

Re: GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hey Carlton, Thanks for responding . This is my first open source project and I'm pretty scared . But my view is to add features for a django pdf library , features which other frameworks have and are not in current scope like in ReportLab. After doing some research , I have found some python ba

Re: GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hi Anuttam. I’d guess that a PDF library itself would be out of scope for Django itself — but this is a perennial problem. **Quite maybe** a project to modernise the Outputting PDFs with Django docs would be in scope... 🤔 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/howto/outputting-pdf/ Questions tha

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hi Manav. Sorry for the late reply. Your proposal looks very good, and your previous contributions are noticed. You’ve obviously taken time to look at it in depth. I think just going over it this week as time allows to maximise clarity is worth it. That’s always time well spent. (Generally there

GSoc proposal : A django pdfs library.

Hello to all my djangomates. I am Anuttam Anand, Btech student from India. For this year's GSoc , I am thinking of making a proposal for a more efficient and feature containing pdf library. Upon researching , I found ReportLab to be the pdf making library in django but it lacks many features an

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Link for the proposal - https://gist.github.com/manav014/9b0feb734e4d140eef1913340602d2ae On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 8:41:32 AM UTC+5:30 Manav Agarwal wrote: > I have added the proposed solution in the proposal. > I request fellow developers to please help me with their respective > suggestio

Re: GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

I have added the proposed solution in the proposal. I request fellow developers to please help me with their respective suggestions, thoughts or feedback, so that I may develop a better and practical proposal. Regards, Manav Agarwal On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:09:46 AM UTC+5:30 Manav Agarwal

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

cache coherence can be a problem, but I am thinking more about what happens when the cache, which is supposed to make things faster, is not available due to error. Django ends up waiting for it. Each request waits for the cache, and this is a hard problem because there is no common shared place t

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Hello, If I am not wrong, you are talking about the cache incoherence problem. Currently, I don't have any concrete idea to tackle this problem but I will try to figure it out. Thanks for bringing this to concern. Kind Regards, Girish On Thursda

GSoC Proposal: (Migrations) Adapt schema editors to operate from model states instead of fake rendered models.

Hello everyone, My name is Manav. I’m a Computer Science and Engineering junior at Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University in India. I started contributing to Django in October 2020 and have solved many issues on trac

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Since REDIS is already usable as a cache for Django using 3rd party code, I would rather see a circuit breaker pattern applied to the cache, across all backends. I'm not that active in maintaining Django right now, but a cache may not be fully redundant, and it also can fail. If the cache is truly

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Hello Carlton, As suggested by you I made some revisions to my proposal. Still, it is not a perfect one, I am trying to improve it. Thanks a lot for the help. Kind Regards, Girish On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 12:15:53 AM UTC+5:30 carlton...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On 31 Mar 2021, at 11:00, Giri

GSOC Proposal : Adding a Redis cache backend to Core

Hey I am an aspirant for GSOC 2021. I was really interested in the project "Adding a Redis cache backend to Core" as I myself have used third party libraries to integrate redis as a caching backend. A link to by draft proposal can be found here

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

> On 31 Mar 2021, at 11:00, Girish Sontakke wrote: > > Now I have doubt that whether I should remove Provides Many Data-Structures > point from the "Why Redis" section or keep it there?. I don’t think it’s vital either way… but it seems a distraction. That Redis has HyperLogLog isn’t somethi

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Thank you, Carlton, I search for discussion in the mailing list about Redis cache I found a helpful discussion here. Should I put my proposal there or should I continue here? In the "Why Redis" section of my proposal,

Re: GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Hi Girish, Welcome. Have a search of the history of the mailing list here. There was one, or a couple of (?) threads on adding a Redis backend recently (last year or two). >From the "Why Redis" section of your proposal, I think the answer is simply that lots of users (most in fact according

GSOC Proposal: Adding Redis Cache Backend To Django Core.

Hello, I am Girish Sontakke from India. I am willing to start contributing to Django through GSOC 2021. I have gone through the Idea List available on the Django wiki page for GSOC and select the project of adding Redis Cache Backend To Dja

Reference to GSoC proposal

Hello guys! Some of you may already know me, as I submitted a proposal for GSoC 2020. I just wanted to let you know that I'm doing well in terms of getting familiar with Django-Stubs . I've already managed to fix some bug (PR #351

Re: GSOC Proposal: 2FA

Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. I have updated the proposal giving more technical details. Regards On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 10:17:38 AM UTC+5:30, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > can you elaborate more on the technical break down of the project steps? > > On Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 11:10:27

GSoC proposal review request

Hi everyone! My name is Chetan Khanna. I'm one of the applicants for GSOC this summer. I had written a proposal for the GraphQL topic and posted it to the forum a week back. But with all the virus situation everywhere, couldn't really get it reviewed property. So I had a request for the communi

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Hi, I'd like to point out that the MySQL backend uses the mysqld utility to create a database dump which is then imported. So, as far as implementation complexity goes, I believe migration once again during setup of the child process might complicate it further. It might just be easier to use on-d

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

You’re both most likely correct, but I think it’s good to get some numbers and compare implementation complexity. It’s also worth considering that often as a project grows in complexity the time it takes to do a full test run grows with it, so perhaps the overhead would be in a fairly constant

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

I agree with Adam here, it not just about running the SQL itself; the current migration framework require models to be (re-)rerendered before a lot of schema operations which slows down dramatically as project grows. The dump/restore approach will undeniably be faster than running migrations fo

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

> > I just finished rewriting it to re-run migrations and setup in each > worker. I didn't bench mark it so I'll do that again later, but as a gut > reaction it isn't significantly slower; but of course the numbers will tell > the real story. I'm a little concerned about rerunning migrations in e

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

You're definitely right! I just finished rewriting it to re-run migrations and setup in each worker. I didn't bench mark it so I'll do that again later, but as a gut reaction it isn't significantly slower; but of course the numbers will tell the real story. Passing the dump string through shared

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

nt me in! > > Best regards, > Nikita Sobolev > > суббота, 28 марта 2020 г., 2:08:07 UTC+3 пользователь Kacper Szmigiel > написал: >> >> Hello everyone! >> >> My name is Kacper, I'm 22 y.o. CS student from Lodz, Poland. I've started >> research

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

: > > Hello everyone! > > My name is Kacper, I'm 22 y.o. CS student from Lodz, Poland. I've started > researching some nice feature for my GSoC proposal, and I have a few > questions to you, dear Community :) > Unfortunately, due to this whole mess caused by covid-19 I h

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Awesome! However there is always a tradeoff between speed and code complexity - it might not be worth a more complex system involving shared memory or copying SQLite files in other ways if it only saves ~5 seconds at the start of a test run compared to re-running the migrations in each worker. I

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

I did stumble upon shared memory when I originally wanted to pass the database connection itself into shared memory. Your idea of passing the query string is MUCH more reasonable, can be done using shared memory, and will ultimately be much more cleanly written. i'll definitely test out if it has

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

There is an interesting addition to the standard library in Python 3.8: multiprocessing.shared_memory (https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.shared_memory.html). It’s only on 3.8 but it might be worth seeing if that has a performance improvement over passing a large string into the

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Thank you Adam for the amazing pointer. That's exactly the solution I was looking for. I didn't even know VACUUM INTO was a thing in SQLite3 (quite nifty). Both sources you listed can definitely copy memory-to-memory efficiently. I had also found two useful APIs in the standard library's documenta

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

> > Currently what I'm figuring out is getting a SQL dump to change SQLite's > cloning method and implementing an Oracle cloning method. I'm searching > through Django's documentation and internal code to see if there is a > ready-made SQL dump method for SQLite and if not I'll search for it in a >

Re: GSOC Proposal: 2FA

can you elaborate more on the technical break down of the project steps? On Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 11:10:27 PM UTC+6, Rohit Jha wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is my proposal for GSoCon 2FA > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f-9hOYHZ9rzLH7UEzdPmVi1n4jQJ92gDwYpqef1ZYMk/edit?usp=sharing > > Feed

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

1. The ORM >> 2. Class based views >> 3. The Request/Response objects >> >> And see if you think it’s viable to add a decent amount of type hints to >> any of these. There is some “magic” in each of these which might be hard to >> express with type hints, but it

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

> of these. There is some “magic” in each of these which might be hard to > express with type hints, but it would be valuable to know how far we could > get. > > Tom > >> On 27 Mar 2020, at 23:07, Kacper Szmigiel > wrote: >> >>  >> Hello everyone! >>

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

Mar 2020, at 23:07, Kacper Szmigiel > wrote: > >  > Hello everyone! > > My name is Kacper, I'm 22 y.o. CS student from Lodz, Poland. I've started > researching some nice feature for my GSoC proposal, and I have a few > questions to you, dear Community :) >

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Apologies for the late response. I've had to attend to personal matters concerning the current crisis we're all facing. All is well though I should have posted a more detailed post from the get-go. I apologize for the lack of clarity as well. Last week, I initially did exactly what you suggeste

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

student from Lodz, Poland. I've started > researching some nice feature for my GSoC proposal, and I have a few > questions to you, dear Community :) > Unfortunately, due to this whole mess caused by covid-19 I had like no > time to sink into Django codebase and figure some thing

Re: GSoC proposal research - type hinting

o. CS student from Lodz, Poland. I've started > researching some nice feature for my GSoC proposal, and I have a few > questions to you, dear Community :) > Unfortunately, due to this whole mess caused by covid-19 I had like no time > to sink into Django codebase and figure some

GSoC proposal research - type hinting

Hello everyone! My name is Kacper, I'm 22 y.o. CS student from Lodz, Poland. I've started researching some nice feature for my GSoC proposal, and I have a few questions to you, dear Community :) Unfortunately, due to this whole mess caused by covid-19 I had like no time to sink i

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Ahh, interesting! I think I can help mentoring, I’ll leave a reply in the official thread 💪 > On 26 Mar 2020, at 11:40, Carlton Gibson wrote: > > Hi Tom. > > (I was wondering if you might fancy mentoring on this project? 🙂) > > On Thursday, 26 March 2020 12:35:34 UTC+1, Tom Forbes wrote: > >

GSOC Proposal: 2FA

Hi, Here is my proposal for GSoCon 2FA https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f-9hOYHZ9rzLH7UEzdPmVi1n4jQJ92gDwYpqef1ZYMk/edit?usp=sharing Feedback and criticism is highly appreciated. Thanks & Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django develope

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Hey, Since Python 3.8, the default method for the multiprocessing module is spawn for Mac OS. On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 17:05, Tom Forbes wrote: > > incompatible in macOS due to a recent update > > Can you elaborate on this a bit? How has a recent update made forking > incompatible on MacOS? > > T

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Hi Tom. (I was wondering if you might fancy mentoring on this project? 🙂) On Thursday, 26 March 2020 12:35:34 UTC+1, Tom Forbes wrote: > > > incompatible in macOS due to a recent update > > Can you elaborate on this a bit? How has a recent update made forking > incompatible on MacOS? > macOS h

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

> incompatible in macOS due to a recent update Can you elaborate on this a bit? How has a recent update made forking incompatible on MacOS? Tom > On 23 Mar 2020, at 19:22, Ahmad A. Hussein wrote: > > Django's parallel test runner works through forking processes, making it > incompatible on W

Re: GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Hello Ahmad, I believe there's interest for supporting parallel test runs on Oracle, if only to make Django's own test suite faster. I'm not very familiar with spawn vs. fork. As far as I understand, spawn starts a new process, so you'll have to redo some initialization in the child processes.

GSoC Proposal to extend the parallel test runner to Windows and macOS and to support Oracle parallel test running

Django's parallel test runner works through forking processes, making it incompatible on Windows by default and incompatible in macOS due to a recent update. Windows and macOS both support spawn and have it enabled by default. Databases are cloned for each worker. To switch from fork to spawn,

Re: help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

ya still searching for the theme to work upon On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:34 PM Carlton Gibson wrote: > Hi all. > > Yes, as Adam says, there's a good amount of info on the Wiki page to get > you started. > > See the Contributing docs and the Advice for new contributors to begin. > https://docs.dj

Re: help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

Hi all. Yes, as Adam says, there's a good amount of info on the Wiki page to get you started. See the Contributing docs and the Advice for new contributors to begin. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/ https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/new-

Re: help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

I too am interested in GSoC. I made 2 PRs around 3 days ago, which are still being reviewed. I am still trying to work on more PRs, but I am having a hard time choosing a component, as I feel like my proposal should be centered around the component I am most familiar with. Should I post my concerns

Re: help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

Hi both, Have you seen: * The wiki page: https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2020 * Recent responses on the mailing list on GSoc (search it) e.g. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-core-mentorship/_GO8rLu881k/V6mYQKmMCAAJ Keshav: you made a great first PR. Searching for other iss

Re: help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

Hello, Im interested in participate too, but I don't have much experience. Can you tell me more about what do you want to do please? Thank you El dom., 23 feb. 2020 6:46 a. m., keshav kumar escribió: > Hello, > I want to participate in GSoC with Django. And I want to work on 'Improve > Admin Fi

help For GSoC Proposal (Improve Admin Filters)

Hello, I want to participate in GSoC with Django. And I want to work on 'Improve Admin Filters' Project. Here I am planning to work on issues related with filters which are not taken by anyone . Is this good approach ? Is there something more that would be helpful or needed which I can add as we

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

urday, April 6, 2019 at 10:30:02 PM UTC+6, PARTH PATIL wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sure that would be nice, as I even mentioned in my abstract I >>>>> definitely need help for that one. >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 8:59:01 PM

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hey Sage, Hey Parth. First-off welcome on board! 🙂 The goal for the next couple of weeks is to get more deeply involved, whilst I guess you start thinking about your projects too. You can follow here, the dashboard and the timeline

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

gt;>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Regarding the declarative syntax, I might share some insights later >>>>> with you. >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 1:29:33 AM UTC+6, PARTH PATIL wrote: >>>>>> >>&

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

; >>> On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 8:59:01 PM UTC+5:30, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: >>>> >>>> Regarding the declarative syntax, I might share some insights later >>>> with you. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 1:29:33 AM

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

I had the same doubt in my mind, what is the best medium to contact mentors? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hello everyone, I would like to thank everyone in here and everyone involved in Django's GSoC participation. This project has been accepted and I will try my best to deliver. On a side note, do we have any communication channel other than this mailing list and IRC? I don't mind using them, but

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hi Asif, I don't mind at all, but I'm still a bit busy with college stuff now, so I'm not sure when I'll be able to do it. On Sunday, 21 April 2019 14:39:25 UTC+7, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > Hi Sage, > > Would you mind opening a draft proposal at django/dep repo? If you can > implement the POC

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hi Sage, Would you mind opening a draft proposal at django/dep repo? If you can implement the POC cross db JSON field, I as a maintainer of django-activity-stream would like to try this with that package. Looking forward to try your POC. Thanks, Asif On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 5:36:04 PM

Re: GSOC Proposal : CrossDB JSON Field

Hi Carlton, I have already submitted this proposal to Google, I will be glad if you can go through it. Thanks & Regards On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:28 PM Carlton Gibson wrote: > Deadline for submissions has passed. I’m reviewing this week. > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 08:52, Adam Johnson wr

Re: GSOC Proposal : CrossDB JSON Field

Deadline for submissions has passed. I’m reviewing this week. On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 08:52, Adam Johnson wrote: > Hi Rohit! > > It seems your email thread has been missed by the list, I don't know why, > perhaps it hit some spam filters. There's also another thread from a > student proposing the

Re: GSOC Proposal : CrossDB JSON Field

Hi Rohit! It seems your email thread has been missed by the list, I don't know why, perhaps it hit some spam filters. There's also another thread from a student proposing the same projectt: https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/415dbb68-d1a8-4642-8908-e6414dde1ad0%40googlegroups.com

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hi, Raphael. Ah, yes, I have seen your project, but I guess I forgot to link it in my proposal. It *is* very interesting, and I believe it will be helpful for anyone who wants to implement this. Let's hope we can make this happen. Thanks for the feedback! Regards, Sage On Tuesday, 16 April 2019

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hi Sage, Hi everyone, I lacked the time to read this mailing list in the past months, and someone at DjangoCon Europe just pointed me to this thread, so just for reference, I want to add some prior work that I did to the list: At DjangoCon US and thereafter, I developed a third-party implementati

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

I researched a bit on FormWizards, and what I felt is that it is oriented more towards the idea of multiple form submission similar to that of Google forms where we have multiple pages. I was thinking of creating a *FormSetContainer* which would be like a collection instance of different Forms

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Ok thank you for your feedback I will check it 😊 On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 2:46 PM, Jamesie Pic wrote: > PS: also check how other python frameworks deal with static files, > particularly the cubicweb framework. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Dja

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

PS: also check how other python frameworks deal with static files, particularly the cubicweb framework. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Hi Ashik, Thanks for your proposal that I find revelant because there needs to be a new version of staticfiles. Supporting NPM, one way or another, is the main way to enjoy the same development workflow with frontend code as with pip. For me it would make sense to support it, one way or another. {

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

Hi Parth. Well, the wizard (&co) got moved out to it's own app https://django-formtools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ But yes, there's no reason why this sort of thing wouldn't potentially in scope. Kind Regards, Carlton On Sunday, 7 April 2019 23:47:23 UTC+2, PARTH PATIL wrote: > > (Sorry I t

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

(Sorry I typed the incomplete message in the last post) I came across this ticket while going over the feature list of Forms and Formsets (# 18830 ) Feature requested in this thicket is something like *FormWizard:* * It will be like a container w

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

I came across this ticket while going over the feature list of Forms and Formsets (# 18830 ) Feature requested in this thicket is something like *FormWizard:* * It will be like a container which can have forms, formsets, and formwizards itself.*

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

e syntax, I might share some insights later with >>> you. >>> >>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 1:29:33 AM UTC+6, PARTH PATIL wrote: >>>> >>>> Here is a link to my GSoC proposal >>>> Its a first draft so you are open to comment

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Scot, Thank you for your feedback. Do you have any suggestions? On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:11 AM Scot Hacker wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 6:03:29 AM UTC-7, Ashik Meerankutty wrote: >> >> Please review and comment my draft proposal for GSOC 2019 >> Draft >>

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

I see, thanks for the info! Why is the ticket still open, though? Also, I still found one failing window test case.. On Sunday, 7 April 2019 16:20:13 UTC+7, Tim Graham wrote: > > MariaDB is supported (see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29548). > The test failures are (as the error message

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Thanks for the information Asif, but it turns out Django already supports MariaDB. On Sunday, 7 April 2019 14:03:14 UTC+7, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > You can open a work in progress pr to fix them one by one gradually and > trying to fix some of them will give you a much better understanding of

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

MariaDB is supported (see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29548). The test failures are (as the error message says) because you haven't installed the timezone definitions. On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 3:03:14 AM UTC-4, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > You can open a work in progress pr to fix the

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Yes, as a personal project sure thing. If you need help ask on django users or respective forum. Contributing to Open Source doesn't really mean to start with GSoC. Start with a pet project and keep working on it. Good luck! Regards, Kiran Capoor On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:10 AM Ashik Meerankutty

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

You can open a work in progress pr to fix them one by one gradually and trying to fix some of them will give you a much better understanding of django orm internals as it is considered the most complex part of the framework. This will also improve your chance to represent yourself as a much str

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Oh, I forgot, one of them is not related to datetime functions: test_unsupported_backend. On Sunday, 7 April 2019 13:26:10 UTC+7, Sage M.A. wrote: > > Hi Asif, > That's a good idea! I've installed the latest stable release of MariaDB > (10.3.14) on my machine and ran Django test suits with it. >

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

Hi Asif, That's a good idea! I've installed the latest stable release of MariaDB (10.3.14) on my machine and ran Django test suits with it. The results (I've truncated them to only contain the failures and errors) show 19 failu

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 6:03:29 AM UTC-7, Ashik Meerankutty wrote: > > Please review and comment my draft proposal for GSOC 2019 > Draft > > Ashik's proposal is more along the lines of a gen

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Can we write our own bundler only for django. Is that good On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 8:04 AM, Ashik Meerankutty wrote: > Thank you for your feed back. > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 12:03 AM, Kiran Capoor > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This has already been implemented via multiple Third party Projects - >> >>

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Thank you for your feed back. On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 12:03 AM, Kiran Capoor wrote: > Hi, > > This has already been implemented via multiple Third party Projects - > > 1. Django Webpack Loader by owais- > https://github.com/owais/django-webpack-loader > > 2. Cookie-cutter Django Webpack by myself(

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

Hi, This has already been implemented via multiple Third party Projects - 1. Django Webpack Loader by owais- https://github.com/owais/django-webpack-loader 2. Cookie-cutter Django Webpack by myself(not production ready though) - https://github.com/kiran-capoor94/cookiecutter-django-webpack Many

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

ater with >> you. >> >> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 1:29:33 AM UTC+6, PARTH PATIL wrote: >>> >>> Here is a link to my GSoC proposal >>> Its a first draft so you are open to comment and suggest changes >>> >>> >>> https://docs.g

  1   2   3   >