On Sunday, September 8, 2013 2:20:56 AM UTC-4, Benjamin Zuill-Smith wrote:
> The django-nonrel project is alive and looking for contributors.
>>
>
> Hi Alex, thanks for responding. I guess I was concerned by the lack of
> commits lately, but looks like it's still alive and kicking by your post.
>
> The django-nonrel project is alive and looking for contributors.
>
Hi Alex, thanks for responding. I guess I was concerned by the lack of
commits lately, but looks like it's still alive and kicking by your post.
I'm interested in helping in this endeavor. I've been pouring over the docs
On Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:12:26 PM UTC-4, Benjamin Zuill-Smith wrote:
> I've recently discovered Django and would love this framework in tandem
> with a NoSql solution like MongoDB. I know there is project called
> mongodb-engine but the solutions it brings feel hackish to me because it
> >
> > I wish people would stop abusing the term "NoSQL". Your target concept
> is
> > Non-Relational data stores, not SQL itself. There's a whole bunch of
> > relational stores that don't use SQL, one of them is even called NoSQL!)
> >
>
> to me, "Non-Relational data stores" still sounds as
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Curtis Maloney
wrote:
> But trying to shoe-horn a single API onto all models won't work.
+1 to this.
there are lots of kinds of databases, relational, hierarchical, object
based, key-value, document-based, column-oriented, graphs,
Well, there was the django-nonrel project, for trying to wrap
non-relational stores [such as Mongo] in a faux relational layer, so they
could then be wrapped in the ORM.
Always felt like a tremendous waste of resources to me -- why use a
non-relational store just to pretend it _is_ one?
My view
I've recently discovered Django and would love this framework in tandem
with a NoSql solution like MongoDB. I know there is project called
mongodb-engine but the solutions it brings feel hackish to me because it is
not built into Django but added like middleware under the hood. I'm weary
of