Say we have:
class Foo(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=128)
number = models.PositiveSmallIntegerField()
bar = models.ForeignKey('Bar')
class Meta:
ordering = ['title',]
class Bar(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=128)
c
try java, or C or even BF
On 11-Dec-07, at 10:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Shoot, so maybe Python just isn't the language for this kind of
> project. I'm not really concerned with making it bullet-proof to
> decompilation, just not so glaringly obvious as opening up the source
> files :)
are you building this for a specific client? or looking to sell to many?
if the former, i'd strongly suggest considering trusting your client
with the code. you're likely to see that trust reflected back towards
you in your relationship. lots of for-hire-and-support contract work
goes belly
I'm not sure how much interest there will be in this, but I was
figuring that maybe someone might have a good use for this, and I
don't know of any existing applications out there for this.
I built a simple Django-based Auction application for a class final
project. It's specifically intended fo
Shoot, so maybe Python just isn't the language for this kind of
project. I'm not really concerned with making it bullet-proof to
decompilation, just not so glaringly obvious as opening up the source
files :)
On Dec 10, 3:29 pm, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 2:43 AM, [E
On 12/10/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
>
> That's not necessary. What the original poster is trying to do should
> work (it certainly does for me). ModelForms is imported into the
> django.newforms namespace.
Ah, okay. I hadn't
On 11-Dec-07, at 8:42 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>> doesnt work. Is there a ModelForm - I see a ModelChoiceForm and a
>> ModelMultipleChoiceForm
>
> Then your source code checkout of [6906], which the original poster
> said
> he was using, is corrupt. You should fix that problem before doin
On 11-Dec-07, at 8:40 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On 11-Dec-07, at 8:34 AM, Marty Alchin wrote:
>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
>
> doesnt work. Is there a ModelForm - I see a ModelChoiceForm and a
> ModelMultipleChoiceForm
arrrgghhh - not the latest svn h
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 08:40 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>
> On 11-Dec-07, at 8:34 AM, Marty Alchin wrote:
>
> >> Any ideas?
> >
> > from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
>
> doesnt work. Is there a ModelForm - I see a ModelChoiceForm and a
> ModelMultipleChoiceForm
Then your sour
On 11-Dec-07, at 8:34 AM, Marty Alchin wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>
> from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
doesnt work. Is there a ModelForm - I see a ModelChoiceForm and a
ModelMultipleChoiceForm
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
Foss Conference
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 22:04 -0500, Marty Alchin wrote:
> On 12/10/07, l5x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
That's not necessary. What the original poster is trying to do should
work (it certainly does for me). ModelForms is imported into
On 12/10/07, l5x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas?
from django.newforms.models import ModelForm
-Gul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hello,
I have been working Django (mod_python or Django server as well). I
have updated it to SVN 6906 (newest at this time), because I wanted to
use the ModelForm, but unfortunately:
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:36:32)
[GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on l
What's tricky here is how to do all of these on the fly and update the
output if there is any changes to the underlying javascript files. Any
thoughts on how to do that?
Or, maybe we should use a svn hook instead of django template tag for
this task?
Alex
On Dec 11, 12:47 am, David Reynolds <[E
On Dec 10, 2007 3:03 PM, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. What you said about not having Django installed in site-packages
> makes me think...
>
> What does your PYTHONPATH environment variable have in it?
>
I wasn't setting PYTHONPATH to anything. Normally packages are picked up
j
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 14:15 -0800, Nianbig wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I´m building an advanced search/filter page and it got too messy doing
> it with the standard Django ORM... so I decided to go with my own SQL-
> string...
> Therefore I need a function that can make input strings SQL
> You're not missing anything - traversing _meta.fields et al is pretty
> much how you would need to do what you are describing.
Thanks, that's what I needed to know!
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
If the example from Rajesh isn't working maybe you should do sth like
that:
/post// ?
For example:
/post/http/google.com
Then join it 'http' + '://' + 'google.com'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Hmm. What you said about not having Django installed in site-packages
makes me think...
What does your PYTHONPATH environment variable have in it?
Do you possibly have the current directory listed before the path to
Django? Because if you try to
from django.conf import settings
before your set
On Dec 11, 2007 7:09 AM, Wyley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> These seem like common tasks, but I haven't been able to find any
> documentation that really gets into the nuts and bolts of dealing with
> related objects, so I find myself doing things like iterating over
> deserialize
Hello all,
I am new to Django and quite excited to be using it. I am attempting
to write some generic import and export methods, and I keep running
into a conceptual hurdle that has to do with related objects:how
can I recursively follow database relations in a way that's not model-
dependen
On Dec 10, 2007 2:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Or perhaps I'm reading into this too much. If I distribute the .pyc
> files minus the .py files, would that work? Is this machine-
> independent (IE: I "compile" the source on an x86, it'll be ok on a 64-
> bit or other arch
سلام شباب
انا من اليمن اتمنى ان اجد اصدقاء اتعرف عليهم
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
اذا ايميلي للتعارف
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googl
سلام عليكم
اتمنى ان اجد انثى بمعنى الانوثة
تؤمن بان الحب في زمننا هذا قد مات
وين انت ياحنون
ودي ابرد نار قلبي
ودي احتضنك بالعيون
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this g
I'm not sure what else to try, but let me know if there's something specific
you want to see. Here's a similar session to what you ran, but note that I
demonstrate 6717 working first. Also note that I'm running Django from
'~/mysite/django'; I don't have any Django version installed in
site-packa
Hello,
I have this model:
class BlogComment(Model):
blogEntry = ForeignKey(BlogEntry, edit_inline=STACKED,
num_in_admin=1)
author = CharField(max_length=100, core=True)
authorMail = EmailField(blank=True)
content = TextField(core=True)
Now I want to use the generic.create_updat
A little over a year ago, I was in your shoes. Microsoft just didn't
do it for me anymore, and I wasn't sure where to turn. A lot of people
here are recommending Ubuntu, but as an individual that was not too
long ago in your situation, and has quickly developed a decent
knowledge of Linux server a
I've done this but with a manually built form.
You can just add the extra form fields to the template, then reference
those extra fields in your view.
new_data['your_new_fieldname'] will work as expected.
In your view you might first create the user object - then create the
customer object rela
Hi Venkat,
> i have the following pattern, '^post/(?P.*)', 'post'
> and, my url is post/http://google.com
> but, I get it as http:/google.com
I don't think this is a Django bug. It's likely that your HTTP server
(mod_python, FCGI layer, etc.) is "normalizing" those forward slashes
well before th
On 10 Dec 2007, at 4:36 pm, David Reynolds wrote:
> If there's a python library for compressing javascript files (which I
> suspect there is) it shouldn't be too difficult to make your own
> templatetag to do this.
For example this...
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/496
Hi everybody. Can i do the below thing?
in the template "foo.html" write this:
...
{% for n in objects %}
var nomeform_{{n.i}} = "{%block validate_form_{{n.i}} %}
{%endblock%}";
{% endfor %}
...
In the template "foo2.html" write this:
{% extends "foo.html"%}
...
{%block validat
On 10 Dec 2007, at 3:55 pm, Alex Dong wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm wondering are there anyone who is working on a django version of
> the AssetPackager? I found it's a pretty cool performance booster with
> little work required from the developer side. Definitely a tool for
> perfectionist
Hello everyone,
I'm wondering are there anyone who is working on a django version of
the AssetPackager? I found it's a pretty cool performance booster with
little work required from the developer side. Definitely a tool for
perfectionist. :-)
Here is the url of the ruby version:
http://synthes
And where is problem? This is normal behaviour.
On 10 дек, 17:24, DierRe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello! I have a weird problem.
> This is the model, really simple.
>
> class Tags(models.Model):
> tag_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
> name = models.CharField(max_length
Hello! I have a weird problem.
This is the model, really simple.
class Tags(models.Model):
tag_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
slug = models.SlugField(db_index=True,max_length=100,unique=True)
amount = models.IntegerF
Hey, thanks guys, now I understand a little better.
One of the articles you're pointing says:
"Currently, the only technique you can reliably use is to override
_save_FIELD_file on your model. This isn't quite the same as
save_FOO_file that's officially documented."
I in fact followed the docume
On Dec 10, 2007 7:46 AM, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the following example, the "save_avatar_file" method is never
> called. However the "_save_FIELD_file" method is called.
> It looks a bit dirty to me, and I'd like to get rid of the
> "_save_FIELD_file method", to only use a method fo
I think this provides more (partially) detail:
http://gulopine.gamemusic.org/2007/11/customizing-filenames-without-patching.html
Thomas
On Dec 10, 2:01 pm, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't explicitly call it myself.
> In fact, the _save_FIELD_file method (not save_avatar_file) is
> au
I don't explicitly call it myself.
In fact, the _save_FIELD_file method (not save_avatar_file) is
automatically called when I save a UserProfile object in the admin
interface, or using a custom form generated by form_for_instance.
Any idea?
On Dec 10, 11:53 pm, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw something similar with overridden save(). How/where do you call
it?
Thomas
On Dec 10, 1:46 pm, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm struggling to understand why, when I upload an image field (either
> from the admin interface or from a custom view), the overriden
> save_FOO
Hi all,
I'm struggling to understand why, when I upload an image field (either
from the admin interface or from a custom view), the overriden
save_FOO_file method is never called.
In the following example, the "save_avatar_file" method is never
called. However the "_save_FIELD_file" method is ca
I have this code to add a new user :
class CustomerForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = CustomerProfile
def add(request):
[..]
if request.method == 'POST':
form = CustomerForm(customer, request.POST)
f.save()
else:
form = Cu
42 matches
Mail list logo
