On 4 déc, 18:46, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> First, thanks for the critiques - I'm not surprised there are better ways to
> write this as I'm just learning python.
Thanks _you_ for taking the critiques as they were intented !-)
> Second, url mapping for me is trivial. Its a web app, not a web site
First, thanks for the critiques - I'm not surprised there are better ways to
write this as I'm just learning python.
Second, url mapping for me is trivial. Its a web app, not a web site. I would
be fairly happy with totally opaque urls ala seaside as long as I didn't have
to think about them.
Todd Blanchard wrote:
>
> I've solved my urls problem for now (though I'm open to more
> elegant solutions)
Depends what you're doing, but if what you're doing fits into its
"chained views" convention, django-catalyst will also autogen relevant
urls for you -
http://code.google.com/p/django-cata
On 3 déc, 08:37, Todd Blanchard wrote:
(snip)
>
A couple observations if you don't mind:
> urlpatterns += patterns('',
>
> (r'^(?P[^/]+)/(?P[^/]+)/(?P[^/]+)\.(?P[^/]+)',dispatch_request),
> (r'^(?P[^/]+)/(?P[^/]+)/(?P[^/]+)',dispatch_request),
> (r'^(?P[^/]+)/(?P[^/]+)\.(?P[^/]+)',
Well, if you disagree strongly with the Zen of Python maybe using Python is
going to be a pain in the ass! :-D
Every language has it's own phylosofy and ways to work. If your way to look
at it is more "against", it comes awful. I know that. I HAVE TO use Grails
(BTW, convention over configuration)
On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> I don't see that as a feature, its a pointless time drain.
Is writing URL patterns really that big of a time sink? Just off the
top of my head, I've probably spent more time fiddling with comment
balancing than working on URL patterns. If
c'mon! is regular expressions! if that bothers you, just do a regex that
woud take anything and through a smart view, define everything
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
> Todd Blanchard wrote:
> > settings.py has a list of applications to include (INSTALLED_APPS).
> > Fine.
Todd Blanchard wrote:
> settings.py has a list of applications to include (INSTALLED_APPS).
> Fine. But then, in urls.py I have to repeat myself by importing each
> application's urls.py to add them. (r'^admin/', include(admin.urls)),
>
> And then I have to fiddle the template path so the
Oh, I've already come to terms with that. So long as XCode makes indenting
easy I'm OK. :-)
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Alex Robbins wrote:
> If you start to complain about significant whitespace too, you aren't
> welcome to stay either. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscr
>You are welcomed to disagree with it, all of us hackers view things
>differently.
>That said, understanding what Tim is saying will help you understand Python and
>the people who use it. Most of us agree with most of Tim's points. I believe
>this
>was mentioned not to tell you to walk away.
Exa
I'm quite aware how the amazon browse service works. I also know it takes a
whole team of people to manage it. I'm one guy. :-)
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Sean Perry wrote:
> Here is the page on Amazon for Learning Python:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> Not sure what you mean? You mean something that looks through the code and
> generates/expands urls for the view methods it finds?
not exactly, just something like i wrote before: a small function that
takes a list of views and constructs t
On Thu Dec 3 8:42 , Todd Blanchard sent:
>
>I've read the little poem. I disagree with about half of it. If you can't
>take
constructive criticism of your toolkit (I have plenty negative to say about
rails
and any of the other dozen web app development environments I know too) then you
sh
Not sure what you mean? You mean something that looks through the code and
generates/expands urls for the view methods it finds?
I don't see the point of that exactly. The dynamic dispatch I'm doing does the
same thing and I prefer dynamic dispatch to code generation (I abhor code
generation)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> Django has several superior features to rails that drive me to use it. The
> admin is much better than active scaffold, there are a number of already
> written apps, geodjango postgis integration, scalability, etc.
>
> That doesn't me
On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Javier Guerra wrote:
> first of all, if you want Rails, you know where to find it. i (and
> several others, i guess) like Django in part because it's *not* Rails.
> :-)
Django has several superior features to rails that drive me to use it. The
admin is much better t
Todd,
If you are just trying to define a restful interface to your objects,
you might look at django-piston[1]
If you really want the Rails approach, you are going to be pretty
frustrated working with Django. The python equivalent of "convention
over configuration" is "explicit is better than imp
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> I think you've kind of missed my point as there's not a view that can render
> any object - but rather the name of the view is in the url.
my 2 cents:
first of all, if you want Rails, you know where to find it. i (and
several others, i gue
On Dec 3, 7:37 am, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> I think you've kind of missed my point as there's not a view that can render
> any object - but rather the name of the view is in the url.
>
> This is the url conf for a typical rails app.
>
> map.connect '', :controller => "public"
> # Install the d
I think you've kind of missed my point as there's not a view that can render
any object - but rather the name of the view is in the url.
This is the url conf for a typical rails app.
map.connect '', :controller => "public"
# Install the default route as the lowest priority.
map.con
I usually don't find myself writing too many redundant views, since
the built-in admin site does so much of that automatically. Then I
just build views specific to the site's public UI. I still find it
curious that you would find yourself recreating said urls. I run a
company database through th
It is mostly a waste of time and busy work.
I like the rails strategy of /controller/action/id
I'd like to define a similar one time couple rules in urls.py
Something like /application/view/id where view is the name of the function in
the views.py in that application.
Anybody got a little snip
22 matches
Mail list logo
