On 14/03/07, Alexander Boldakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The web pages served in my django applications are not static media
> files, but dynamically generated content (the result of applying XSLT
> transformation to the XML data retrieved from XML database). I
> consider the architecture
The web pages served in my django applications are not static media
files, but dynamically generated content (the result of applying XSLT
transformation to the XML data retrieved from XML database). I
consider the architecture of public site with static version of data
and private dynamic site,
Alexander Boldakov wrote:
> Django deployment documentation claims the need of flup as the FastCGI
> library. Are there any flup features that Django relies on?
Nothing specific. Flup is recommended because it's pure Python and
easier to install.
Also documentation *strongly* recommends not to
Have you done any profiling to see where your bottlenecks are? There's a
decent set of notes on profiling Django at
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ProfilingDjango and an even greater
writeup at
http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/django-profiling-hotshot-and-kcachegrind/.
Apache+Mod_Python and
I am running a system with basically the same versions of all software
packages as you are. It is in production and under stress testing it
performed very very well and there've been no issues with performance
so far. I am using Apache + FastCGI, server-managed.
First thing you might want to
Hello all,
My django application runs slower under Apache+FastCGI or
Lighttpd+FastCGI than under django development HTTP server. The
approximate times for generating the page are 0.6 vs 1.0 seconds for
FastCGI and development server correspondingly.
I've tried different combinations of
6 matches
Mail list logo
