Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Tim Draegen
On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:35 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > > Once the milestones discussion has settled..., Ned and myself will create > > an outline of topics and work items that, when worked through, should have > > the WG arrive at its deliverables. > > > > =- Tim > > What about adopting a somew

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Jim Fenton
[dropping apps-discuss from this reply] On 08/18/2014 08:31 AM, Tim Draegen wrote: > Hello world of email, > > The DMARC WG is getting started [1]. This IETF working group's goal is to > address interoperability issues with indirect email flows, to document > operational practices, and to matur

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [apps-discuss] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Dave Crocker
On 8/24/2014 3:37 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > If you have comments on the milestones, please provide them by August 25th. > Have fun, So, obviously I read the wrong text carefully. Sorry. Was so zoned into doing a series of reviews I forgot that the wg was already chartered, and no it doesn't g

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Miles Fidelman
Tim Draegen wrote: On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we going to get to a "document (that) captures all known interoperability issue between DMARC and indirect email flows?" If this were an RFC, there'd be an

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Kurt Andersen
On Aug 24, 2014 5:48 PM, "Tim Draegen" wrote: > > Once the milestones discussion has settled..., Ned and myself will create an outline of topics and work items that, when worked through, should have the WG arrive at its deliverables. > > =- Tim What about adopting a somewhat more agile, less wa

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Tim Draegen
On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we going to > get to a "document (that) captures all known interoperability issue between > DMARC and indirect email flows?" If this were an RFC, there'd be an author > or au

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Start of DMARC WG + proposed milestones

2014-08-24 Thread Tim Draegen
On Aug 23, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On the other hand, a common exercise in a wg organizing bof is to look > for a show of hands for interesting in specific topics and willingness > to work on them. > > Perhaps an informal query like that, here, would be useful? Yes, I'll post su