On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we going to > get to a "document (that) captures all known interoperability issue between > DMARC and indirect email flows?" If this were an RFC, there'd be an author > or authors identified, maybe a draft to start from. > > At a minimum, it seems like someone might want to generate an initial > outline, and set it up as a wiki where folks can start providing input.
Hi Miles, you're right. There is very little around process today. Once the milestones discussion has settled (as I probably too briefly mentioned to Dave Crocker in this thread), Ned and myself will create an outline of topics and work items that, when worked through, should have the WG arrive at its deliverables. This outline should give everyone a clear picture and plenty of opportunity to volunteer. ! =- Tim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
