Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Peter M. Goldstein
+1 on adopting On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:50 AM Kurt Andersen wrote: > Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd > like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document as > an official WG item. > > This

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Jiankang Yao
support +1 Jiankang Yao From: Kurt Andersen Date: 2018-12-10 23:50 To: dmarc@ietf.org Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's ht

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >> AIUI, local parts don't get puny-coded. > >Even when attempting to look them up via the macro mechanism? No, never. There is no way to re-code a UTF-8 local part. Don't even ask. If it sounds like I've had this argument before, I have and I really don't want to have i

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >> what was already implicit; s and l macros will never match if the local >> part of the email address contains non-ascii characters. >> > >Why not? If the non-ASCII (or non-7bit) characters are puny-coded, it seems >like they should be able to match without any problems.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 10, 2018 5:02:30 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:58 AM Scott Kitterman >wrote: > >> >> >> On December 10, 2018 4:31:03 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" > >> wrote: >> >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman > >> >wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Since I'm

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:58 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On December 10, 2018 4:31:03 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" > wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman > >wrote: > > > >> > >> Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at > >the > >> SPF updates

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 10, 2018 4:31:03 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman >wrote: > >> >> Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at >the >> SPF updates. Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC >7208 >> says. I

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Seth Blank
+1 On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:28 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On December 10, 2018 3:50:00 PM UTC, Kurt Andersen > wrote: > >Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, > >I'd > >like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-app

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at the > SPF updates. Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC 7208 > says. I don't know that we need that. The difference is to make explicit > what was

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 10, 2018 3:50:00 PM UTC, Kurt Andersen wrote: >Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, >I'd >like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document >as an >official WG item. > >This doc is a nor

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Dotzero
+1 Michael Hammer On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM Kurt Andersen wrote: > Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd > like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document as > an official WG item. > >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Hector Santos
+1 On 12/10/2018 10:50 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote: Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document as an official WG item. This doc is a normative reference in

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Tim Wicinski
+1 on adopting this. I will sign up for review, etc. Tim On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM Kurt Andersen wrote: > Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd > like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05

[dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth as WG work

2018-12-10 Thread Kurt Andersen
Now that the charter update has gone through the necessary processing, I'd like to ask the WG to adopt John Levine's https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth-05 document as an official WG item. This doc is a normative reference in both the ARC protocol doc and 7601bis. --Kurt And