On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:53:22 PM EDT ned+dm...@mrochek.com wrote:
> > In article
you
write:
> > >I for one am always amazed how much people use web forums, which are
> > >almost
> > >all universally worse at providing a reading interface or keeping people
> > >up-to-date on new messages... w
> In article
> you
> write:
> >I for one am always amazed how much people use web forums, which are almost
> >all universally worse at providing a reading interface or keeping people
> >up-to-date on new messages... which might be why most of the one's I look
> >at are nearly dead, maybe there a
In article
you write:
>I for one am always amazed how much people use web forums, which are almost
>all universally worse at providing a reading interface or keeping people
>up-to-date on new messages... which might be why most of the one's I look
>at are nearly dead, maybe there are better ones
So you think we should include
https://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Mitigating_DMARC_damage_to_third_party_mail in
the actual spec?
Brandon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:26 AM Hector Santos wrote:
> Hi Brandon, some quick points:
>
> 1) I was 100% concentrating on the technical protocol aspects to make
>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:01 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:09 AM wrote:
> > Thanks for you honesty. Then the relevant question is whether open and
> > interoperable standards still matter, or if they should be replaced by
> > proprietary web apps one feature at a tim
Hi Brandon, some quick points:
1) I was 100% concentrating on the technical protocol aspects to make
DMARC protocol complete. DMARC is currently not protocol complete. It
does not address the failure scenarios related to 3rd party
re(signers). It left loopholes that need to be closed. The
ap