[DNG] ctwm docs

2017-10-20 Thread Steve Litt
Hi all, I forgot to mention it, but about a month ago I finished my ctwm documentation tree: http://troubleshooters.com/linux/ctwm/ I think it's the best single source of ctwm documentation, although it certainly could use improvement. Ctwm isn't for everybody. It's a no-panel lightweight

Re: [DNG] systemd-udevd: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1

2017-10-20 Thread golinux
On 2017-10-20 20:24, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:33:33 -0400 John Franklin wrote: You owe him an apology. Perhaps you're right. Here it is. Tobias, instead of railing against this list's primary priority, why don't you go join the systemd project and make it

Re: [DNG] systemd-udevd: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1

2017-10-20 Thread John Franklin
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > >> You owe him an apology. > > Perhaps you're right. Here it is. Tobias, instead of railing against > this list's primary priority, why don't you go join the systemd project > and make it the init of your dreams.

[DNG] ID Quantique "Quantum" PCI-e RNG's - does anyone have more info?

2017-10-20 Thread taii...@gmx.com
I found this seemingly cool product, a pci-e hardware RNG that produces a large stream of "truly random" "quantum" random numbers. https://www.idquantique.com/ It is made in Switzerland, which is cool as it isn't outsourced and it endeavors way more trust than chinese hardware. I am

Re: [DNG] systemd-udevd: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1

2017-10-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:33:33 -0400 John Franklin wrote: > > On Oct 16, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Steve Litt > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:18:43 +0200 > > "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" wrote: > > > >> Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:46:28 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:22:33AM +0200, Jaromil wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > > > > Steve Litt writes: > > > > Does anyone here actually use redis? I looked it up, and to me > > >

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread Patrick Meade
On 10/20/2017 10:22 AM, John Hughes wrote: On 20/10/17 16:37, Antony Stone wrote: However, Bardot Jérôme's original posting in this thread, quoting Chris Lamb Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:55:00 -0400 said: "This version drops the Debian-specific support for the

Re: [DNG] Amprolla3 is out for testing

2017-10-20 Thread aitor_czr
On 10/20/2017 11:47 PM, goli...@dyne.org wrote: Dear dev1rs, We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's amprolla by parazyd and Wizzup, is finally up and running and ready to be tested. Hurray!! The DevJuanBoy ___ Dng

[DNG] Amprolla3 is out for testing

2017-10-20 Thread golinux
Dear dev1rs, We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's amprolla by parazyd and Wizzup, is finally up and running and ready to be tested. The code can be found at: https://git.devuan.org/devuan-infrastructure/amprolla3 The rewrite increases the frequency of merges

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread John Hughes
On 20/10/17 16:37, Antony Stone wrote: However, Bardot Jérôme's original posting in this thread, quoting Chris Lamb Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:55:00 -0400 said: "This version drops the Debian-specific support for the /etc/redis/redis-{server}.sentinel.{pre,post}-{up,down}.d

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread John Hughes
On 20/10/17 16:48, goli...@dyne.org wrote: On 2017-10-20 09:27, John Hughes wrote: My appologies for posting to a list from which I have been banned . . . If you were 'banned' you would would not have been able to post. I just checked and your account has no restrictions on it. Yup, I

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread golinux
On 2017-10-20 09:27, John Hughes wrote: My appologies for posting to a list from which I have been banned . . . If you were 'banned' you would would not have been able to post. I just checked and your account has no restrictions on it. Wouldn't it be more to the point to find out *if* you

Re: [DNG] systemd-udevd: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1

2017-10-20 Thread Tobias Hunger
@Nikolaus: UEFI is closed source software (just as BIOS), so of course the usual problems with closed source also apply here. I trust my notebook vendor just enough to not fuck this up badly enough so that random thieves will be able to get around secure boot though:-) I am pretty sure though

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 20 October 2017 at 16:33:09, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:27:44PM +0200, John Hughes wrote: > > Jaromil wrote: > > > I would like to know here if anyone knows in detail the "reasons" > > > Debian is removing the support for sysvinit scripts in the redis > > >

Re: [DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:27:44PM +0200, John Hughes wrote: > Jaromil wrote: > > I would like to know here if anyone knows in detail the "reasons" > > Debian is removing the support for sysvinit scripts in the redis > > package. > > Wouldn't it be more to the point to find out *if* Debian is

[DNG] Debian testing drop redis non systemd

2017-10-20 Thread John Hughes
Jaromil wrote: I would like to know here if anyone knows in detail the "reasons" Debian is removing the support for sysvinit scripts in the redis package. Wouldn't it be more to the point to find out *if* Debian is removing the support for sysvinit scripts in the redis package before trying

Re: [DNG] systemd-udevd: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1

2017-10-20 Thread Narcis Garcia
Perhaps this helps you for a more static configuration: https://git.actiu.net/libre/mactoname/ El 06/10/17 a les 18:12, J. Fahrner ha escrit: > Hello, > I found the message > "systemd-udevd[415]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1" > in my dmesg log. > 1. why is there a systemd daemon? > 2.