Dear all,
I've just submitted the draft below on using ECDSA with Brainpool Curves for
DNSSEC.
The rationale behind this submission is the fact that the German electronic
health insurance card (Gesundheitskarte) mandates the use of DNSSEC, while the
use of Brainpool curves is recommended by
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time
> mangement. After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to the
> DNSOP charter:
>
> ---
>
> 5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the D
This was the use case that originally drove the development of OmniBroker.
If we do DNS Encryption right it is going to be very easy for end
users to chose their DNS provider and very hard for the authorities to
block them.
Security is a balance. Going through 8.8.8.8 rather than direct means
tha
On 3/21/14, 7:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
6. Publish documents which address DNS-related issues, by identifying and
documenting the problem space around the issue. The group will then discuss
these issues and decide if which group should
I am fine with these 2 items if DNS includes DNSSEC. Maybe replacing
DNS by "DNS or DNSSEC" clarify this.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> On 3/21/14, 7:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 6. Publish docume
On 3/21/14, 9:46 AM, Daniel Migault wrote:
I am fine with these 2 items if DNS includes DNSSEC. Maybe replacing
DNS by "DNS or DNSSEC" clarify this.
Currently #2 of the charter states:
2. Publish documents concerning DNSSEC operational procedures.
But I understand what you mean her
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 09:49:46AM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> But I understand what you mean here, and I was thinking it was a
> logical extension.
Since the expansion of the term is "The DNS Security Extensions", it
is indeed a natural extension at least.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalru
On 3/21/14, 9:50 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 09:49:46AM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote:
But I understand what you mean here, and I was thinking it was a
logical extension.
Since the expansion of the term is "The DNS Security Extensions", it
is indeed a natural extension at
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> This was the use case that originally drove the development of OmniBroker.
>
> If we do DNS Encryption right it is going to be very easy for end
> users to chose their DNS provider and very hard for the authorities to
> block them.
+1.
> Security is a balance. Goin
On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:39 AM, "Schmidt, Jörn-Marc"
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've just submitted the draft below on using ECDSA with Brainpool Curves for
> DNSSEC.
>
> The rationale behind this submission is the fact that the German electronic
> health insurance card (Gesundheitskarte) mand
10 matches
Mail list logo