This doesn't feel like a consensus call to me, Tim. It feels like voting.
We don't care how many people were in favor versus against. We care why
they were in favor or against. If everyone who's against is against because
"we don't like it" and everybody whos in favor is in favor because "we have
t
> Il 12/07/2022 15:02 Tim Wicinski ha scritto:
>
> Our Poll answers are "Adopt Now","Adopt Not Now", and "Don't Adopt"
> We mapped these responses to 1, 0, -1 (no answer is also 0).
>
>
> Final Results:
>
> * draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques, 14
> * draft-dwmtwc-dnsop-caching-resolu
Thanks to everyone who’s participated in the poll. As we’ve said before,
the chairs rely on a number of factors when setting WG administrative
priorities, but occasional polls help us clarify feedback we’re hearing
from the WG list, other DNS-oriented WGs, and the broader community.
Since WG con
Hi all,
Gentle reminder, the poll runs until July 9.
Best,
-- Benno
On 27/06/2022 12:44, Tim Wicinski wrote:
All
We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working
group. My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for all of these
and let the working group sort it out
On 6/27/2022 11:29 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to
bypass discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to
consider six drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a
strong likelihood of insufficient review.
+1 - the s
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Ted Lemon wrote:
I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to bypass
discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to
consider six drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a strong
likelihood of insufficient review.
I also mis
I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to bypass
discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to consider six
drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a strong likelihood of
insufficient review.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:45 Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
All
We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working group.
My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for all of these and let the
working group sort it out, but was told that is just crazy. Since Warren
loves these poll things, we put another one together on all the documen
