Hi Dan and Ralph
On 06/09/10 22:03, Dan Dart wrote:
initial questions, if anyone on the list has experience using gcc as a
cross-compiler.
Yep - I use buildroot a lot.
What's multilib and how does it fit in with newlib (which I gather I need to
build for a different target)?
Multilib is a fe
http://oriordanssocietymatters.blogspot.com/2010/09/it-beggars-belief.html
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Tuesday 2010-09-07 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://bit.ly/4sACa
Hi Tim,
> It's turning out to be a bit of project because of gcc/newlib
> interdependencies which means having to build a bootstrap gcc, then
> newlib, then finally gcc again with newlib.
I'm surprised an x86-host m68k-target gcc needs to be built with an m68k
newlib to hand?
Cheers,
Ralph.
-
Hi,
I'm surprised newlib is in use here at all. Did you choose it, and if so why?
I'm not a newlib buff so I won't know about how it's awesome quite yet
I'm afraid.
If all else fails, check out buildroot as it can probably make you a
toolchain, plus a load of userspace stuff, based on µClibc/bus
Hi Dan,
> > 1 root:x:0:clive,root
>
> I thoughth normal users weren't allowed to be in the root group?
I agree. I see no reason why another user would normally be in that
group.
Cheers,
Ralph.
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Tuesday 2010-09-07 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ..
Hi jr,
> > Â Â ralph:x:1000:1000:Ralph Corderoy,,,:/home/ralph:/bin/bash
> > Â Â ralph:x:1000:
> > newgrp(1) will still let me change to group `ralph' even though I'm
> > not explicitly listed in /etc/group.
>
> so what you're saying is that newgrp allows you to change group *to*
> the group t
Hi Dan,
> I'm surprised newlib is in use here at all. Did you choose it, and if
> so why?
>
> I'm not a newlib buff so I won't know about how it's awesome quite yet
> I'm afraid.
>
> If all else fails, check out buildroot as it can probably make you a
> toolchain, plus a load of userspace stuff
Hi Ralph
On 07/09/10 12:50, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Tim,
It's turning out to be a bit of project because of gcc/newlib
interdependencies which means having to build a bootstrap gcc, then
newlib, then finally gcc again with newlib.
I'm surprised an x86-host m68k-target gcc needs to be built
Hi Dan
On 07/09/10 12:52, Dan Dart wrote:
Hi,
I'm surprised newlib is in use here at all. Did you choose it, and if so why?
Yes, because at this stage I don't know any better. This is all totally
new territory for me.
I'm not a newlib buff so I won't know about how it's awesome quite ye
On 07/09/10 13:15, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm surprised newlib is in use here at all. Did you choose it, and if
so why?
I'm not a newlib buff so I won't know about how it's awesome quite yet
I'm afraid.
If all else fails, check out buildroot as it can probably make you a
toolchain, plu
10 matches
Mail list logo