On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 00:26 -0400, sergey ivanov wrote:
> Mar 29 00:06:00 alt64 dovecot: IMAP(seriv): mmap() failed with index
> file /home/seriv/.imap/dovecot.index: No such device
ENODEV The underlying filesystem of the specified file does not
support
memory mapping.
What O
ok, this makes total sense...
the logs show that postfix does not get the email to process. So, i
don't think it's postfix/main.cf -- at least it's configured just as
redhat recommends to work with dovecot. i just looked at the firewall
settings and by adding all of these ports:
25, 110,
I'm trying to use dovecot-deliver with sieve plugin, delivering to
Maildirs. Everything seems working O.K., but I'm getting the following
lines in /var/log/maillog:
---
Mar 29 00:06:00 alt64 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=66.80.117.2, lip=192.168.10.8, TLS
Mar 29 00:06:00 alt6
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm running RHEL v 5 and 1.0-1.2.rc15 of dovecot and 2.3.3-2 of postfix.
users can send mail to outside hosts, but can not receive them. i find no
errors in the maillog -- i used a page from the redhat docs to configure
postfix and dovecot
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:38:59AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 29.3.2007, at 1.10, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> >>Anyway if it happened repeatedly, it would be nice to get the
> >>anonymized mbox and index files. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/
> >>MboxProblems
> >
> >I have reproduced this on a
i'm running RHEL v 5 and 1.0-1.2.rc15 of dovecot and 2.3.3-2 of postfix.
users can send mail to outside hosts, but can not receive them. i find no
errors in the maillog -- i used a page from the redhat docs to configure
postfix and dovecot so that they used the same mail directory... i
think...
Quoting John Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 28/03/2007 19:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
People running Fedora Core run 0.99, and they do not know it isn't
production
(since it comes with FC, which they don't know isn't production).
They ought to; FC in its entirety is devel for RHEL, and thi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:38:59AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 29.3.2007, at 1.10, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> >>Anyway if it happened repeatedly, it would be nice to get the
> >>anonymized mbox and index files. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/
> >>MboxProblems
> >
> >I have reproduced this on a
On 28/03/2007 19:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
People running Fedora Core run 0.99, and they do not know it isn't
production
(since it comes with FC, which they don't know isn't production).
They ought to; FC in its entirety is devel for RHEL, and this is
prominently pointed out all over the F we
On 29.3.2007, at 0.03, Frank Cusack wrote:
On March 28, 2007 4:35:50 PM -0400 John Peacock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What this model does is to make many more small releases (no more
RC129),
each with a stable feature set.
I don't see how that's different than a/b/rc numbering. You can
Hello Ralf,
Ohh thanks for your reply and i start to understand what is going on. You
tell everything very well. It is amazing. After i read your mail, I export a
variable
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-brtl" and now i find shared object files (.so) in
their proper places after compilation. At first glance
On 29.3.2007, at 1.10, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Anyway if it happened repeatedly, it would be nice to get the
anonymized mbox and index files. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/
MboxProblems
I have reproduced this on a test box; here is the backtrace from
the core
that was generated:
Can you rep
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:24:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.3.2007, at 22.13, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> >Under Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10 we noticed this error today
> >affecting
> >one of our users repeatedly:
> >
> >Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file mbox-sync-
On March 28, 2007 5:07:30 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the argument that numeric only works much better for packagers is
very powerful, IMNSHO...
Yeah, I agree with that.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Note the UID FETCH 119071:* command. Outlook thinks the latest UID it
has seen is 1190710, so it tries to fetch new messages with that
command. It doesn't really even want to fetch 11703 here, but because
"*" matches the latest existing message (by IMAP spec), the last messag
On 28.3.2007, at 23.47, Erik van Oosten wrote:
When I try to open the attached mbox file I get the following
warning in Thunderbird 1.5.0.10:
'The current command failed. The e-mail server responded: Mailbox
isn't a valid mbox file'.
You have an extra empty line at the beginning of the file
On 28.3.2007, at 23.58, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Could you get gdb backtrace? Although it's possible that it's already
fixed. I can't reproduce any out-of-quota problems with current CVS
code.
(gdb) bt
#0 mail_cache_register_fields (cache=0x0, fields=0xbfd90,
fields_count=9)
at mail-cac
Frank Cusack wrote:
On March 28, 2007 4:35:50 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What this model does is to make many more small releases (no more RC129),
each with a stable feature set.
I don't see how that's different than a/b/rc numbering. You can still
cut as many releases a
On 29.3.2007, at 0.04, Randolph Kahle wrote:
Is there a command I can issue or a file I can examine to determine
the release version of my installation?
dovecot --version
If that doesn't work, then you're using way too old version. :)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On 28.3.2007, at 23.45, Jay Chandler wrote:
Keep getting this error within Squirrelmail (and other clients) on
one particular user's mailbox file:
ERROR: Could not complete request.
Query: SELECT "INBOX.Backup"
Reason Given: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file
I've snipped the first and last mess
On Mar 28, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Randolph Kahle wrote:
I am a dovecot newbie and I am setting up a machine that already
has dovecot installed.
Since bugs are being resolved rapidly, it appears that I need to
know the release version of dovecot I am running.
Is there a command I can issue or
On 28/03/07, Frank Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some files I want to transfer from Plesk qmail to Postfix with
virtual mailboxes, MySQL, Maildir etc.
I can add the accounts to the database manually as there are only a
few of them. In the case of the mail folders, is it merely a matte
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written:
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I'd really prefer using type b versioning as then there is no ambiguity
when attempting to build packages for dovecot. There are many examples
in the Debian re
I am a dovecot newbie and I am setting up a machine that already has
dovecot installed.
Since bugs are being resolved rapidly, it appears that I need to know
the release version of dovecot I am running.
Is there a command I can issue or a file I can examine to determine
the release versio
On March 28, 2007 4:35:50 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What this model does is to make many more small releases (no more RC129),
each with a stable feature set.
I don't see how that's different than a/b/rc numbering. You can still
cut as many releases as you like.
1.1.0
1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:02:28PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
.
.
.
> On 27.3.2007, at 22.40, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> >For the second test, I created $HOME/.imap and $HOME/.imap/INBOX
> >directories with the owner and group set to that of the user (just
> >to make sure th
Jay Chandler wrote:
Keep getting this error within Squirrelmail (and other clients) on one
particular user's mailbox file:
...
Anyone have any ideas? Only one user out of many is having this issue,
but he's whiny...
Try taking the physical mbox file, putting it on a client machine with
Thun
Keep getting this error within Squirrelmail (and other clients) on one
particular user's mailbox file:
ERROR: Could not complete request.
Query: SELECT "INBOX.Backup"
Reason Given: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file
I've snipped the first and last message off of it, still no love.
mailserver#
Frank Cusack wrote:
Right, so my point is, you have the same problem and can't tell which
1.3.x is newer than a 1.2.x (on a feature-by-feature or bugfix-by-bugfix
basis). I guess it might not matter. But it's nice to say "use 1.2.5+"
for such-and-such feature and not have to worry that 1.3.0 do
On March 28, 2007 3:59:59 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
You misunderstood that. After the release of 1.2.0, 1.1.x is
frozen and development starts again in 1.3.0.
And then how do you release 1.2.1?
This is a well understood process (even/odd development
On 28.3.2007, at 22.58, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Running Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10..
We have been noticing intermittent messages of this sort and
wondered if
this indicates whether we need to add more dovecot-auth worker
processes:
Mar 28 03:15:41 myhost dovecot: pop3-login: Can't con
> "TS" == Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> gw# krb5-config --version
TS> FreeBSD heimdal 0.6.3 $Id: krb5-config.in,v 1.9 2002/09/09 22:29:06
joda Exp $
TS> gw# krb5-config --libs gssapi
TS> -L/usr/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lcrypto -lroken -lcrypt -lcom_err
I'm
On 28.3.2007, at 22.50, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Mar 28 13:41:37 myhostname deliver(myuser): net_connect(/var/opt/
dovecot/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: No such file or directory
Not sure how my environment is different than when Postfix calls
deliver...
Oh. So you're not using the -d param
On 28.3.2007, at 13.34, Michal Soltys wrote:
I'm not sure if it's even intended to work in this particular
case, but there's a problem when chroot is explicitely defined
and rawlogging is used. Rawlog respects chroot point, without
being actually chrooted.
I did several fixes now. These should
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:39:55PM -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> I go to atrpms or dag wieers or elsewhere, and it might list both devel
> and production ones, but it doesn't say that, it just lists version
> numbers. How am I to know, unless I'm smart enough to go to the original
> web site and
Frank Cusack wrote:
You misunderstood that. After the release of 1.2.0, 1.1.x is
frozen and development starts again in 1.3.0.
And then how do you release 1.2.1?
This is a well understood process (even/odd development). Once 1.2.0 is
released, all new development moves to 1.3.x. 1.2.1 is a
Running Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10..
We have been noticing intermittent messages of this sort and wondered if
this indicates whether we need to add more dovecot-auth worker processes:
Mar 28 03:15:41 myhost dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at
default: Connection refused
Mar
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:39:45PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
.
.
.
> >>You could also try running it manually:
> >>
> >>echo hello | deliver -d username
> >
> >Doing so yields this error:
> >
> >Mar 28 13:41:37 myhostname deliver(myuser): net_connect(/var/opt/
> >dovecot/
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
>
> With a) style the releases
On 28.3.2007, at 20.26, Mike Brudenell wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007, at 18:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- 16. stalled for 16 secs in LOGIN
Try changing http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess settings,
especially
login_process_per_connection=no and see how much it helps.
Sorry I forgot to give my cur
On 28.3.2007, at 21.42, Steven F Siirila wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:02:28PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.3.2007, at 22.40, Steven F Siirila wrote:
For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all.
I received the vacation message, but the message which was supposed
to
On March 28, 2007 8:46:08 AM +0200 Juergen Daubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version
>> numbers. But any comments on which one is better:
>>
>> a) Postf
On 28.3.2007, at 22.17, B. Cook wrote:
I been noticing that dovecot isn't updating when the user last
logged in.. and I can't seem to figure out why. I also can't seem
to find anything in the archives about it.. so am I the only one?
..
I'm wondering how I could get the 'last auth' to popul
Hi,
I run qmail/vpopmail and changed to using vchkpw instead of vpopmail for
that very reason. My auth section looks like this:
auth default {
mechanisms = plain
passdb checkpassword {
args = /usr/local/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
}
userdb prefetch {
}
user = vpopmail
}
I th
On 28.3.2007, at 22.13, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Under Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10 we noticed this error today
affecting
one of our users repeatedly:
Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file mbox-sync-
rewrite.c: line 423 (mbox_sync_read_and_move): assertion failed:
(need_space
Hi all,
Does anyone have an idea how can I remove(delete) my virtual mail users'
maildir?
I have Dovecot + LDAP and I would like to do something like this: When I
remove an user entry in my ldap server, it should remove my user
directory information.
Does anyone has this implemented? Or
Hello,
I run the domain for the school here with qmail and vpopmail on FreeBSD
with dovecot from the ports.
I'm running dovecot 1.0.r26 and everything is working great.
I been noticing that dovecot isn't updating when the user last logged
in.. and I can't seem to figure out why. I also can'
Under Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10 we noticed this error today affecting
one of our users repeatedly:
Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line
423 (mbox_sync_read_and_move): assertion failed: (need_space ==
(uoff_t)-mails[idx].space)
Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost d
John Peacock wrote:
I have already accepted a message for an aliased address, but the MTA
isn't going to be rewriting the envelope address, so how can I get
dovecot's deliver to dereference the alias and deliver to the correct
Inbox?
Just to follow up on my own posting: it turns out that it i
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:02:28PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 27.3.2007, at 22.40, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> >For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all.
> >I received the vacation message, but the message which was supposed
> >to be delivered locally queued in Postfix (
Quoting Justin McAleer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
A lot of the posts in this thread seem to be debating between version
numbering and storage layout, which are not mutually exclusive
Yes, but this only addresses the problem at the source, not at the
redistribution point (mirrors, rpm repositories, d
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Taras Savchuk
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:41 PM
> To: pod
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Building problem on FreeBSD with GSSAPI
>
>
> gw# krb5-config --version
> FreeBSD heimdal 0.6.3
> $Id: krb5-con
I have some files I want to transfer from Plesk qmail to Postfix with
virtual mailboxes, MySQL, Maildir etc.
I can add the accounts to the database manually as there are only a
few of them. In the case of the mail folders, is it merely a matter of
copying the mail files over, or are there some ad
I'm in the final stages of testing my e-mail server to come and I seem
to have hit a roadblock.
One option of current vpopmail is to store all aliases in a valias
table, that looks like this:
+-+--+--+-+-+---+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Def
On 087, 03 28, 2007 at 11:37:16AM +0200, burolib wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm still facing troubles on my way. This time concerning ssl encryption.
>
> only dovecot-auth starts...
>
> imap and pop3 go down with this log
>
> dovecot: Mar 23 18:34:19 Info: Dovecot v1.0.rc27 starting up
> dovecot: Mar 23
On 28 Mar 2007, at 18:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- 16. stalled for 16 secs in LOGIN
Try changing http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess settings, especially
login_process_per_connection=no and see how much it helps.
Sorry I forgot to give my current login and auth settings (which, I
have to ad
gw# krb5-config --version
FreeBSD heimdal 0.6.3
$Id: krb5-config.in,v 1.9 2002/09/09 22:29:06 joda Exp $
gw# krb5-config --libs gssapi
-L/usr/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lcrypto -lroken -lcrypt -lcom_err
pod ÐÉÛÅÔ:
>> "TS" == Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TS> I have erro
On Wednesday 28 of March 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.3.2007, at 11.49, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > tpop3d allows me to say:
> > maildir-ignore-folders: Spam Trash trash Sent sent-mail POP3-Invisible
> > (would be stupid to fetch own sent-mail via pop3 again 8-)
>
> POP3 has only one mail
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:07 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> ...after 15 seconds or so I started getting output along the lines of:
..
> Logi List Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo
> 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 10%
>30% 5%
Greetings -
I've now got as far as playing with the imaptest10 test utility to
see if I can stress-test our development server. imaptest10 is built
against dovecot-1.0rc28
It may just be that I'm excessively heavy handed, but when I let
imaptest10 rip with the command...
./imaptest10 u
On 28/03/2007 17:32, Taras Savchuk wrote:
In FreeBSD pam_group does exactly what I want:
Oh, sorry, didn't know you were on *BSD but I suppose I shouldn't have
assumed Linux. In Linux-PAM, pam_wheel's documentation is very similar
to your pam_group, with the addition of an option:
use_uid
On 28.3.2007, at 11.38, Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT) wrote:
If you still can't get it to work, set mail_debug=yes and see if
there's anything interesting in the logs.
already done .. nothing and nothing ... I can see the login SQL
queries ..
I can see the quota fetched from the userdb_quo
On 28.3.2007, at 11.49, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
tpop3d allows me to say:
maildir-ignore-folders: Spam Trash trash Sent sent-mail POP3-Invisible
(would be stupid to fetch own sent-mail via pop3 again 8-)
POP3 has only one mailbox, so what does it do to non-ignored folders?
Does it merge a
On 28.3.2007, at 16.37, Lutz Preßler wrote:
I have a problem (at least with 1.0rc28 and 1.0rc27) when using
the following namespace definitions:
..
IMAP access is working as expected, but when connecting with POP3(s),
POP3 currently ignores namespaces completely. The mail location is
taken
Hello funkypunky drunky,
on AIX dovecot plugins (which are shared objects = .so) are a little bit
problematic. It is not enough to activate run time linking by using
-brtl and make the main program (dovecot) to be able to use shared
objects. When a share object does function calls back into the ma
In FreeBSD pam_group does exactly what I want:
NAME
pam_group -- Group PAM module
SYNOPSIS
[service-name] module-type control-flag pam_group [arguments]
DESCRIPTION
The group service module for PAM accepts or rejects users based on
their
membership in a particular file gro
Quoting Chris Wakelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I don't like this, as the average new user has no idea that the odds
are unstable, and runs them, then gets flamed for it, etc. No matter
how well you document it on the web/wiki, people are g
On 28/03/2007 16:52, Taras Savchuk wrote:
Pam auth don't work when I add pam_group:
pam_group grants membership to groups, it can't be used to authenticate.
Use pam_wheel or pam_succeed_if, and see
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/Linux-PAM_SAG.html
Cheers,
John.
Pam auth don't work when I add pam_group:
gw# id test2
uid=10001(test2) gid=1(adusers) groups=1(adusers),
1(group1), 10001(group2), 10002(test10)
gw# getent passwd test2
test2:*:10001:1:Our AD-Unix Test Account:/home/test2:/bin/sh
gw# cat /etc/pam.d/dovecot
auth re
IMHO unstable versions should never go into packages/ports trees. And if they
do, they should be clearly marked as unstable (in debian sid there're some of
these: the package names are foobar-unstable).
Anyway, keeping development releases separated from stable ones is compatible
with the linux
Hello,
I have a problem (at least with 1.0rc28 and 1.0rc27) when using
the following namespace definitions:
namespace private {
separator = "/"
inbox = yes
location = mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u
}
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix = 0-LISTS/
location = mbox:/var/mail/l
On Wed, March 28, 2007 3:50 am, Joseba Torre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> El Miércoles, 28 de Marzo de 2007 04:55, Eric Rostetter escribió:
>> Why not just put actual (stable) releases in the "releases/" directory,
>> and
>> put the "unstable" releases in another directory (unstable, testing, or
>> some such).
pam_group!
John Robinson пишет:
On 28/03/2007 12:10, Taras Savchuk wrote:
I'm just finished FreeBSD/AD integration via Kerberos/LDAP and now I
can manage unix users/groups from AD. I want to grant access to IMAP
based on user membership in certain group. Is it possible? Can you
give me some h
John Robinson пишет:
On 28/03/2007 12:10, Taras Savchuk wrote:
I'm just finished FreeBSD/AD integration via Kerberos/LDAP and now I
can manage unix users/groups from AD. I want to grant access to IMAP
based on user membership in certain group. Is it possible? Can you
give me some hints?
My
Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the releases could be done b
On 28/03/2007 12:10, Taras Savchuk wrote:
I'm just finished FreeBSD/AD integration via Kerberos/LDAP and now I can
manage unix users/groups from AD. I want to grant access to IMAP based
on user membership in certain group. Is it possible? Can you give me
some hints?
My quick thought is that t
Hi.
Does someone make update for `Multiple IP(or Host) listen in
dovecot.conf'?
I made trivial patch so.
But this patch doesn't solve `Support listening in multiple sockets'
in TODO. It appends only the capability as multiple listen in
dovecot.conf. So, `login_processes_count' becomes ambiguous.
I'm just finished FreeBSD/AD integration via Kerberos/LDAP and now I can
manage unix users/groups from AD. I want to grant access to IMAP based
on user membership in certain group. Is it possible? Can you give me
some hints?
Thanks in advance!
--
С уважением, Савчук Тарас
ООО "Элантек" : Аутс
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0
I'm not sure if it's even intended to work in this particular
case, but there's a problem when chroot is explicitely defined
and rawlogging is used. Rawlog respects chroot point, without
being actually chrooted.
Consider configurtion as below, with two cases (dovecot.rawlog
dir is of course creat
On 3/28/2007 burolib ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
All the times i get the same error. my dovecot.conf says:
Please don't provide snips from plain dovecot.conf file...
Always use dovecot -n output - this shows exactly what the running
dovecot is actually using, which may differ from what you thi
You are right, I meant maildir group quotas. Just like the group fs
quota. The ldap support would be just the value of the quota storage. I
hope it will be implemented soon.
giannis.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.3.2007, at 11.12, Ioannis Zachariadis wrote:
Is there a plan to support LDAP gro
Why not just put actual (stable) releases in the "releases/" directory, and
put the "unstable" releases in another directory (unstable, testing, or
some such).
I think this is the easier way. If it's clear that unstable is unstable (i.e.:
not to be used in production), version numbering is not
Hi.
I'm still facing troubles on my way. This time concerning ssl encryption.
only dovecot-auth starts...
imap and pop3 go down with this log
dovecot: Mar 23 18:34:19 Info: Dovecot v1.0.rc27 starting up
dovecot: Mar 23 18:34:20 Error: Temporary failure in creating login processes,
slowing down
Eric Rostetter wrote:
>> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
>
> I don't like this, as the average new user has no idea that the odds
> are unstable, and runs them, then gets flamed for it, etc. No matter
> how well you document it on the web/wiki, people are going to mis
On 28/03/2007 01:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the rel
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 10:48, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Also as a packager, I must remark on the ambiguity of (a). Normally letters
> come after numbers in order. Luckily in Debian, it can be transformed
> into "1.1~UNSTABLE.MMDD", where "~" is ranked lower than even the empty
> string.
I a
Hello
I'm looking at migration path from my current setup (tpop3d/courier-imap) and
I seem to miss one feature - ability to ignore some subfolders for pop3.
tpop3d allows me to say:
maildir-ignore-folders: Spam Trash trash Sent sent-mail POP3-Invisible
(would be stupid to fetch own sent-mail via
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 02:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
>
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 23:57, David Anderson wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that this is working for them? If it is, can you post
> the relevant bits of your configuration, please?
I think this is the same issue of my previous post ...
so, I think I can confirm
--
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 22:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It is, unless you tell quota code to use it, like:
>
> quota = dict:storage=10240:messages=1000 proxy::quotadict
>
I have already done it ... in the plugin{ .. } section and it does nothing
> If you still can't get it to work, set mail_de
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:46:40 +0300
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version
> numbers. But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unsta
92 matches
Mail list logo
