Timo Sirainen wrote:
> dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox in two
> locations.
I am very, very pleased to hear that you are working on this! Just at
this moment, I am busy replacing a Dovecot IMAP based server with one
with more powerful hardware, and until the tests
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:06 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So is this targeted as a kind of replication solution then?
Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions
without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the
move/conversion.
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 01:43 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 22:31 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
>> >> This sounds really awesome! How testable is it?
>> >
>> > By "testable" do you mean "is it working now"? It should
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 01:43 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 22:31 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
> >> This sounds really awesome! How testable is it?
> >
> > By "testable" do you mean "is it working now"? It should work except for
> > mailbox del
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 19:33 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> One thing I'm not really sure about in Kerberos is, does both MIT and
> Heimdal require that you are using system users and to have NSS set up
> in a way that Kerberos code can look up users with getpw*() functions?
Ah, looking at the origi
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 22:31 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
>> This sounds really awesome! How testable is it?
>
> By "testable" do you mean "is it working now"? It should work except for
> mailbox deletions and renames. But I haven't really tested it, just ran
> unit tests
Not really.. Another future thing might, though. :)
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 00:20 +0200, Christian Felsing wrote:
> Does this mean true multi master operation ? That would make configs
> with load balancers much easier :-)
>
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> > dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility f
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:41 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > I guess this fixes it again:
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/f4ff64dd79a9
>
> We've tested dovecot with all four available patches (it means up to date
> mech-gssapi.c ) and it wokrs.
I've been talking with the main Heimdal
Does this mean true multi master operation ? That would make configs
with load balancers much easier :-)
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox in two
> locations. Some things it can be used for:
Hello,
is there a config possible which supports both of following
authentication schemes ?
1st: If user presents a client certificate, he can log in w/o
username/password, where user id comes from CN. Accepting any password
is not the right solution.
2nd: If user does not present a client certi
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:01 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Will this be configurable on a per mailbox basis? Or is it intended to
> be server <-> server / all or nothing?
You'll need to call it one user at a time in the proper environment
(UNIX UID and GID set up right). How to do that and multipl
On 7/17/2009 4:34 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> So, when will 2.0 be in any kind of semi-usable state (by non-programmer
>> types)? ;)
> Dunno. And I'm still hoping to break its index files code completely
> before stabilizing it :)
You're obviously having way too much fun... time for a break... ;)
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 22:31 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
> This sounds really awesome! How testable is it?
By "testable" do you mean "is it working now"? It should work except for
mailbox deletions and renames. But I haven't really tested it, just ran
unit tests. :) And it pretty much requires u
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 16:23 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> So, when will 2.0 be in any kind of semi-usable state (by non-programmer
> types)? ;)
Dunno. And I'm still hoping to break its index files code completely
before stabilizing it :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
Timo Sirainen writes:
> dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox in two
> locations. Some things it can be used for:
>
> - Initially transfer a mailbox to another server via SSH
> - A faster sync done to an existing mailbox, sending only changes
> - A superfast sync ba
On 7/17/2009 3:59 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 15:57 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way
>>> replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server
>>> that aren't in the primary server, it most lik
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 15:57 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way
> > replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server
> > that aren't in the primary server, it most likely means you just lost
> > some mails on you
On 7/17/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions
> without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the
> move/conversion.
This just sounds great, and yes, I can definitely see a need for both.
> I think even
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:06 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> So is this targeted as a kind of replication solution then?
Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions
without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the
move/conversion.
I think even using dsy
On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox
in two
locations. Some things it can be used for:
- Initially transfer a mailbox to another server via SSH
- A faster sync done to an existing mailbox, sending only changes
-
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:59 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> Now, the question is: Does anyone want dsync to only sync changes from
>>> source to destination, instead of doing a full two-way sync? I think in
>>> typical cases where you'd think you would want only one-way sync
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:59 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > Now, the question is: Does anyone want dsync to only sync changes from
> > source to destination, instead of doing a full two-way sync? I think in
> > typical cases where you'd think you would want only one-way sync are
> > also the cases
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox in two
> locations. Some things it can be used for:
>
> - Initially transfer a mailbox to another server via SSH
> - A faster sync done to an existing mailbox, sending only changes
> - A superfast sync base
dsync in Dovecot v2.0 tree is a new utility for syncing a mailbox in two
locations. Some things it can be used for:
- Initially transfer a mailbox to another server via SSH
- A faster sync done to an existing mailbox, sending only changes
- A superfast sync based on modification sequences.
- S
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:28 -0400, Mark R. Baith wrote:
> Timo - Sorry: We forwarded one of the many dovecot.confs
> we've been playing with; (that one had auth turned off;)
>
> We're using "sendmail." Here's the auth dovecot.conf;
Well, Sendmail doesn't support doing authentication via Dovecot
Timo - Sorry: We forwarded one of the many dovecot.confs
we've been playing with; (that one had auth turned off;)
We're using "sendmail." Here's the auth dovecot.conf;
# 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imaps pop3s
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dov
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:47 -0400, ma...@essic.umd.edu wrote:
> auth default:
> mechanisms: plain login
> verbose: yes
> debug: yes
> debug_passwords: yes
> passdb:
> driver: passwd-file
> args: /etc/dovecot/passwd
> userdb:
> driver: passwd-file
> args: /etc/dovecot/use
Timo - As requested. Regards -M
# 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imaps pop3s
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login
mail_debug
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:50 -0400, Mark R. Baith wrote:
> Folks - With Dovecot 1.0.7, we're seemingly unable to
> authenticate users for out-going SMTP access who are
> not residing directly within the main system passwd/shadow
> files.
Post your dovecot -n output.
signature.asc
Description: Th
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:51 +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
> What I'd like to achieve is that postfix uses the trigger value from the
> Database as well, but that deliver allows a small bit more - say 5, 10, or
> 20MB.
Actually there shouldn't be a need to patch Dovecot to get this. You
could just
Folks - With Dovecot 1.0.7, we're seemingly unable to
authenticate users for out-going SMTP access who are
not residing directly within the main system passwd/shadow
files.
(I.e. the users seeded within our non-system "dovecot"
userdbs & passwd files have no "smtp-auth" joy! (Ye
olde "Relaying de
On Freitag, 17. Juli 2009, Philipp Marek wrote:
> So I looked into the sources, and came up with the attached (untested, not
> even compiled) patch against 1.2.1.
...
> I've now looked into the sources, and tried to sketch the basic change that
> I imagine; please see the attached patch.
The newer
Hello everybody,
I've been with this question in IRC the last days, but no solution was found.
So I looked into the sources, and came up with the attached (untested, not
even compiled) patch against 1.2.1.
Rationale
---
I'd like to bounce on the external side, which is quite easy if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:04:24AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've thought that it would be nice if my mail was always converted to
> OpenPGP encrypted form.
>
> My setup is, I use fetchmail to pull in my mail to dovecot. Then I read it
> using km
Curtis Maloney schreef:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I have a question regarding my mail flow.
We have some users who are in a mail group (alias), and these alias
receives a lot of attached documents.
So i have the document in all the mailboxes of the alias.
If the attached document is 2M
I've thought that it would be nice if my mail was always converted to
OpenPGP encrypted form.
My setup is, I use fetchmail to pull in my mail to dovecot. Then I read it
using kmail (which supports OpenPGP as well as S/MIME).
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Tristan Rex Santiago wrote:
> hi!
>
> i'm trying to do smtp authentication using dovecot and exim4 by following
> this guide http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL.
>
>
> for the exim4 part, i got an
>
> authenticator dovecot: cannot find au
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:12 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>> > With large installations with multiple servers that could allow user
>> > to
>> > see e.g. if they're on the same server as someone else they know, or
>> > when they get moved to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:36:30AM -0500, Justin Krejci wrote:
> Some companies and governments in the United States at least have very
> strict policy requirements regarding various aspects of security and
> encryption.
Understandable.
>
Axel Luttgens schrieb:
> Le 17 juil. 09 à 00:45, Ralph Seichter a écrit :
>
>> Axel Luttgens wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> What shouldn't be allowed wrt RFC rules, unless I'm wrong: at any time,
>>> the user should be able to trace the path of a received message (an SMTP
>>> server MUST add a Received h
hi!
i'm trying to do smtp authentication using dovecot and exim4 by following this
guide http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL.
for the exim4 part, i got an
authenticator dovecot: cannot find authenticator driver "dovecot"
error after i entered the codes in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.te
Le 17 juil. 09 à 00:45, Ralph Seichter a écrit :
Axel Luttgens wrote:
[...]
What shouldn't be allowed wrt RFC rules, unless I'm wrong: at any
time,
the user should be able to trace the path of a received message (an
SMTP
server MUST add a Received header, never remove or modify such a
he
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I have a question regarding my mail flow.
We have some users who are in a mail group (alias), and these alias
receives a lot of attached documents.
So i have the document in all the mailboxes of the alias.
If the attached document is 2MB and that is not rare, i
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 00:07 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>>> I'm getting tired of explaining again and again how expire plugin is
>>> supposed to work, so I added now Example #1 timeline and Example #2
>>> timeline to http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plu
Hello all.
I have a question regarding my mail flow.
We have some users who are in a mail group (alias), and these alias
receives a lot of attached documents.
So i have the document in all the mailboxes of the alias.
If the attached document is 2MB and that is not rare, i have 10 times 2
MB on
45 matches
Mail list logo
