On 2024-01-24 16:35, Steven Varco wrote:
Although I’m also a very happy dovecot replication user, I don’t think this
decision will be reverted, sadly.
However, despite of messing with NFS, I will try setting up a three-node
GlusterFS Cluster to give redundant storage to dovecote as mail store
Although I’m also a very happy dovecot replication user, I don’t think this
decision will be reverted, sadly.
However, despite of messing with NFS, I will try setting up a three-node
GlusterFS Cluster to give redundant storage to dovecote as mail store and hope
it performs well enough… Has
I apologize if this isn't the appropriate place for this question.
Consider a Sieve script with this instruction:
fileinto :create "folder 1.folder 2.folder 3";
That faithfully creates in Maildir the folder named '.folder 1.folder
2.folder 3'/
An IMAP Client shows this in tree format
On 2024-01-21 09:29, Michael Peddemors wrote:
On 2024-01-21 04:43, Patrick Domack via dovecot wrote:
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
Christian Kivalo skrev den 2024-01-21 02:08:
Just wish LMTP would not end up with duplicate Return-Path headers..
Duplicate return path headers? I don't see them on
Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please
rethink this.
Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos (on
different operating systems), with dovecot synchronising via replication. Both
are behind a HAProxy running on the router
Some success creating and using filters, created via roundcube, but,
when testing activate and deactivating filter sets, received an error.
However, I can edit and add filters without apparent error, even
"importing" from an existing filter set.
var/log/dovecot-info.log shows, in part:
On 23/01/2024 09:23, Joseph Tam wrote:
My guess is Outlook is doing some
autodiscovery/autoconfiguration thing, and
occasionally hits the right combo and successfully authenticates.
I think, the intention is to make life of users easier: no need to
remember authentication type, starttls or
