I don't have an ALT specified in the mail location of the shared namespace.
Also when I add there ALT= I keep getting these checks. Also creating empty
file there creates this error.
Error: t_readlink(//mdbox/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink()
I don't really like the idea of creating a s
I am getting this error. This file does not exist.
Error: t_readlink(/xx/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink() failed: Permission
denied
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
I am adding a namespace with LAYOUT=index to an existing configuration, and get
this notification:
LAYOUT=index requires mailbox_list_index=yes
Maybe better to just not risk it and add LAYOUT=fs to my existing
mail_location=mdbox: lines?
___
dovec
Hi Christian, nice you got this. I could have given you this also, but I have
this weird tree in the mail client, so I thought better not share it. I prefer
to see only 1 'Archive'
>
> I found the Solution myself. The key was to simply create an unnamed
> mailbox directive so that the namesp
>
> > I think a good work around would be using LAYOUT=INDEX then you get
> > folder names like this and you 'probably' do not have such conflicts.
> > I think this layout is also better for when people start using
> > 'weird' characters or long names. Bad thing is, you need to convert
> > everyth
>
> Example: Customer has a Folder named: ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX
>
> Folder file exists and permissions look right:
> ./ARCHIV/AdministrationXXX
>
> d delete ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX
> d OK Delete completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs).
>
> Folder file is still present and can not be deleted again.
>
How is it possible that you have problems compiling a srpm? You must have
changed something. What is even this el6? ;) If you want run dovecot on older
el6 maybe try via docker?
> I encountered the following issue while compiling Dovecot on a Linux
> system with the Shenwei architecture in Chin
I have made some temporary fix with a cron job that checks this every 5 min and
auto subscribes mailboxes when a user is added to the acl. But I am still
looking for something better.
>
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox
> is being shared so the u
It was related to some memory allocation in go. When I increased the memory in
lmtp. This problem was solved. Others started to notice this after some
specific version update of go.
>
>
> Op 19-9-2024 om 22:46 schreef Marc via dovecot:
> > I am trying to modify the body of
I don't think you can use outlook mobile clients any more with own solutions. I
was trying this a few years ago and noticed all kinds of weird things not
working. I think it even sends your user+password to the microsoft cloud and
the ms cloud is handling your mail on the background.
Can't reall
I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox is
being shared so the user is automatically subscribed to it?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
also bug/no acl support in accessing index
dovecot[28746]: imap(usertest6)<29630>: Error:
fchown(/shared/usertest/index/mailboxes.lockcfcdcd07648b68e0,
group=10001(usertest)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=10006, group based
on /shared/usertest/mdbox - see http://wiki2.dovecot.or
I am not sure if this page is correct, looks at least like this g+s not ok
https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/admin_manual/filesystem_permission/
work-around is to manually create dirs mdbox mdbox/storage mdbox/mailboxes. I
would think this is a bug as files seem to be created correctly.
group rights a
I am testing with sharing folders and constantly changing namespaces configs.
But quite regulary I am seeing these mailboxes popup
foldertest17270834637853 with sub mailbox foldertest
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send a
>
>
> On 23-09-2024 10:30, Marc via dovecot wrote:
> > this seems to show
> > doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6
> >
> > Trash
> > Sent
> > NotSpam
> > Drafts
> > Junk
> > Shared
> > UserShares
> > UserShares/usert
this seems to show
doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6
Trash
Sent
NotSpam
Drafts
Junk
Shared
UserShares
UserShares/usertest
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest3
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest1
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest2
INBOX
But thunderbird / roundcube show nothing. Any idea's why?
_
>
> It doesn't look as if IMAP is supported ?
> ___
Maybe try again later after a good night rest?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> I am creating the mailbox like this:
>
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
> shared/sharedtest1
>
> I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same.
>
> doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read
> write write-seen ins
I am creating the mailbox like this:
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest shared/sharedtest1
I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same.
doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read write
write-seen insert post
doveadm a
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1
public/mdbox/mailboxes) failed: Operation not permitted
[@public]# getfacl mdbox/
# file: mdbox/
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::rwx
group:testgroup2:rwx
group:testgroup3:rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
_
>
> I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups
>
> creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem:
>
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
> public/publictest1
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups
creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem:
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest6 public/publicte
I am cleaning a bit my sieve scripts and wondered if I should stick to this
solution
sieve_before =
sieve_before2 =
sieve_before3 =
or just one
sieve_before =
and put all scripts in this one. What are the advantages / disadvantages of
doing this?
__
> Amelia Marie via dovecot skrev den 2024-09-20 08:44:
> > Free ecards from Sendwishonline.com are designed to create memorable
> > and engaging experiences. Many cards feature interactive elements, such
> > as animations and music, that enhance the recipient's experience. This
> > level of creativ
I am trying to modify the body of message with a global sieve script. It looks
like that sieve-test does not generate this error, however I am not really able
to verify the output. There does not seem to be an option to catch the output
(new message)
trace log
0008:3: finishing match
sieve-test(1164123): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID (see
mail_uid setting)
I don't get what this is about. Users are not missing an UID and how is it
related with testing sieve scripts?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.
>
> What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve
> plugin. If I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0.
>
> ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin?
>
script is ok
Debug: sieve: Finished running script (status=ok, resource usage: no usage
recorded)
__
What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve plugin. If
I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0.
ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an em
> >> Tests failing when attempting to build for both EL8 and 9:
> >
> > When is 2.4 for el9 expected?
>
> GhettoForge will release it after the general availablility of 2.4.
> Others from Dovecot have stated that it will be available directly from
> the dovecot ce repos once 2.4 is released.
>
B
> On 14/08/24 23:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
> >
> > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
> > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
> > Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
> >
start to worry when it is quattuordecillions
>
> I just filled up my whole /var with zillions of files
> /var/spool/smtpd/offline , dating back to 2018. What are these files
> and is it safe for me to delete the ones more than a week old?
>
___
dov
>
> Vulnerability Details:
> Having a large number of address headers (From, To, Cc, Bcc, etc.)
> becomes excessively CPU intensive. With 100k header lines CPU usage is
> already 12 seconds, and in a production environment we observed 500k
> header lines taking 18 minutes to parse. Since this can
>
> we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
>
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
> Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
> Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
I know about t
>
> I am getting the following error when Postfix attempts LMTP delivery :
>
> "lmtp(REDACTED)<32674><7Jm0BSVopmaifwAAbW4UVQ>: Fatal:
> setresgid(121(mailbox_user),121(mailbox_user),8(mail)) failed with
> euid=111(mailbox_user): Operation not permitted"
>
> mailbox_user is uid 111, gid 121 on
>
> >
> > >
> > > How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > obviously this is set:
> > sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
>
> At first I thought maybe it was some spf/dmarc related setting. But this
> script is sending out the test message. I need the vac
>
> >
> > How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
> >
> >
>
> obviously this is set:
> sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
At first I thought maybe it was some spf/dmarc related setting. But this script
is sending out the test message. I need the vacation to use/add the -
>
> How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
>
>
obviously this is set:
sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> > I am a bit rookie with sieve. Some time ago I created a sieve pipe that
> would sometimes alter alter the subject and move a message to a different
> mailbox. Currently this results in that a date changes of this message
> while I don't see anything in the source altering a date.
> >
> > What c
I am a bit rookie with sieve. Some time ago I created a sieve pipe that would
sometimes alter alter the subject and move a message to a different mailbox.
Currently this results in that a date changes of this message while I don't see
anything in the source altering a date.
What could be causi
Maybe easier to make these users linux users/posix accounts and then
authenticate against linux. With nslcd and sssd you also have some caching you
can benefit from. I am not even sure if this is related to dovecot or your
postfix.
>
> I am trying to setup AD auth with dovecot and have tried
;s not fully broken, but it's not
> fully working either.
Are there any bug reports in Debian you could refer to, please?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailad
vecot 2.3.19.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *
>
> I definitely don't know if it's a dovecot issue, but I thinks it's a good
> place to start looking, since dovecot is managing the mailboxes. Can I
> increase the verbosity in a way that saving an email into a folder would
> be logged?
Maybe reindex the mailbox and see if the messages turn up?
>
> Lots of the emails I send aren't stored in the sent folder. It seems
> that it mostly (but not always) work for sent emails where the main
> email-address (the one that is also used as login name) is used as
> sender. It never seems to work when an alias is used as sender name.
>
> I didn't
> I thought it was just a lack of skill on my part in finding/making the
> correct configuration.
I am curious about your results, so keep posting! :)
> But what do large email servers that use Dovecot do?
>
> I thought it was an orchestration between OpenLDAP, Postfix and Dovecot
> because
> Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
> > It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log
> > without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have
> > execution permissions if they aren't meant to be executed, which should
> > only be t
> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
> Archiving.
>
> I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by
> the report-ham.sieve script):
>
> exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
>
> Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed tha
> On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote:
> > I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this
> > is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for
> > 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages
> &
I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this is an
efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for 'auto
archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages are being
moved by cron jobs, and modification logs are put into their accounts. T
>
> auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ?
>
> That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to
> *dropping the connection*.
>
> We are thus looking for three different behaviours:
>
> 1. If backend confrims auth, ACK auth + proceed (grant access) to email.
>
> 2. If backen
> Looking for some advise.
Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What
ever gets hammered stays local
>
> What I'm hoping is that dovecot has some way to in case of such
> "authentication backend" problem scenarios to ignore protocol and
> politeness and simply
>
> Sure it's my own fault - no discussion about that, but seriously? How
> dangerously unintuitive it that?
>
I don't really get what is going on with remote host. How is a host name even
relevant other than setting up the initial connection. I don't even see it in
my storage mail files.
_
I can remember looking at rspamd years ago. I thought it was a bit chaotic with
all these rules. I can even remember asking developers some design questions
which they could not answer. The fact that they generate their own graphs
(still?) is also old fashioned. This Sergey that is working on ma
> > I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous
> postfix installs, but I would like to start now with the new google
> rules. I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended,
> however, other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's
> maintainers
>
> No they aren't. The *host part* is case insensitive because the DNS is,
Indeed. Letsencrypt is utilizing this characteristic, they query the same
hostname every time with different randomized(?) capitalizations. I have no
idea what the logics behind this is.
Preventing this from showing in
>
> > Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis
> > unix/linux implementations, those are mostly well thought through by
> > experts. This is from before the time that 'idiot' companies started
> > using email addresses for logins, so it is easier (to track users
> > acro
>
> John Stoffel via dovecot skrev den 2024-04-16 14:51:
>
> > In general, usernames should NOT be case sensitive, that way leads
> > madness.
>
Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis unix/linux
implementations, those are mostly well thought through by experts. T
> Hello. Using Mochahost and want to delete mailbox items older than 1
> month (approx) from receipt . Reading DoveCot documentation, not finding
> age query. Can you please specify this for me and provide an example?
>
doveadm move -u $account Archive/$year mailbox "$mbox" SENTBEFORE $nyear-01
>
>
>
> • Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot [2024-04-10 21:07]:
> > Guys, any help?
>
> What you describe is exactly what I have been doing since ... forever
>
Why? The whole idea about having a LTS distribution is that you almost never
need to do this? It is not like the imap/pop/smtp s
>
> Guys, any help?
this lacks context.
> Also, what would happen if the new server has a different hostname ?
So put temporary haproxy infront of it?
> Il giorno dom 10 mar 2024 alle ore 14:28 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi guys
> > I have to migrate around 10k mailboxes fro
maybe list rocky and centos9 stream on the repo page?
https://repo.dovecot.org/
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> This is ... bug like.
>
> The user moves a folder inside another, the resulting path exceeds the
> maximum length, the folder's content is no longer accessible, the user
> complains.
I don't think this is a bad idea. If this is really the issue.
> Double trouble. The user proceeded to mov
> >
> > doveadm sync -u testacc
> 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT
> ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index'
> >
> > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive
> namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot
> > > >
> > > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize
> mailbox
> > > > > renaming
> > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> > > indices)?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dovecot is, if you use
> >
> >
> > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > >
> > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> > > renaming
> > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> indices)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mail
> > > breaking the mail index
> >
> > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> renaming
> > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)?
> >
>
> Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mailbox GUID on
> disk, and the folder name i
>
> It was a constant pain ... Finally resolved by migrating them to MS-365.
> Maybe dovecot would be more forgiving, but we did not dare to try.
That is why these fuckers of Apple and Microsoft are doing it, and these morons
at EU market abuse commissions don't get it, don't read complaints. et
>
> > I keep finding myself in a corner with a user. He uses mail
> extensively, which
> > is fine, he has a huge archive of own professional correspondence,
> which is
> > fine, but he uses mail folders as if they were regular system folders,
> with
> > very long paths, and keeps renaming them an
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption, doveadm force-
> resync can't repair it (throws segfault)
>
Are you sure it is not something else, your message is even empty.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe sen
egy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site)
> Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/the-
> book/>
> Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book-edition-iii/>
> YouTube Channel <http://www.youtube.com/@GerbenWierda>
>
>
How many servers do you have? How many active clients do you have?
>
> Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please
> rethink this.
>
> Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos
> (on different operating systems), with dovecot synchr
And what if someone is on vacation? You can also use dnsbl on your submission,
that helps a lot.
>
> Are there publicly available lists of IP ranges by region?
>
> There's no reason for any IP outside of North America to be contacting
> Postfix on Submission (587) or IMAP, since these are employ
Any traffic that is not your client's, is unwanted. I have never ever had some
scanning company called me, saying 'here you have 100 us$ because we used your
data' or 'here are some tips to configure this better'.
If someone is scanning you, it is always in their advantage not yours, no santa
c
Does dovecot 2.0 supports EC private key?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> Dovecot has this option to store attachments separately not? So I am
> not sure this is then still a problem.
>
>
>
> Interesting. How do you tell dovecot to do that ?
>
I thought I read about something like this,
mail_location = ATTACHMENTS=/attachment
but now you have made me
>
>
>
> The problem is a bit what everyone understands as s3. I associate
> this indeed also with an http endpoint on object storage. But the ceph
> plugin skips this http and talks directly to object store. I don't think
> you would like to operate on this http level. If I look at this pa
>
> 17.10.2023 12:22, Filip Hanes via dovecot пишет:
> > S3-compatible storage is very good for multi-server installations where
> you need redundancy, availability. S3 is basically HTTP server so you can
> code your own logic on stored emails, balancers, caches, deduplication,
> compression, encr
>
>
> >
> > If you are using Ubuntu, OpenZFS is readily available, and support
> deduplication natively.
>
>
> I thought nobody sane actually used ZFS dedup because it eats RAM for
> breakfast, lunch and dinner ?
>
What an interesting and informing reading lately!! Thanks everyone!!
__
> >>>
> Is s3 not to slow for this?
>
> >>> I think the clue is in the name "s3-compatible".
> >>>
> >>> Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter.
> >>>
> >>> But a local installation of something like CEPH, MinIO or whatever on
> the
> >>> same LAN ? I'd think that s
>
>
> > Is s3 not to slow for this?
> >
>
> I think the clue is in the name "s3-compatible".
>
> Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter.
>
> But a local installation of something like CEPH, MinIO or whatever on the
> same LAN ? I'd think that should be workable, no ?
> >>
> >> What is being removed is the replicator plugin (that used dsync).
> That's what is being referred to in the video. Replicator hasn't been
> actively maintained for years now so this was dead code anyway.
> >
> >
> > Well, so Laura is absolutely right ...
>
> "Things like dsync will
> >
> > If that is the case, well then I have to find another way to keep mails
> in sync between 2 mailservers. Hope the community will find a new solution!
> >
>
> I have been keeping one eye on Stalwart (https://stalw.art/) for a while
> now.
>
> I haven't tested it as yet, but I'm very much t
> > Hello to everyone!
> > Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization
> will be
> > a native deduplicated filesystem.
>
> did you really mean deduplicated or distributed?
>
I think this duduplicating. Storage systems are offering such solutions. I
think ceph has some
> Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization
> will be a native deduplicated filesystem.
>
Is this feature really useful? I can imagine if you are twitter or ig and
everyone is posting the same video this could be usefull. Are there any stats
on this available, so yo
Why not run a cron job every 60 days on your accounts with something like
doveadm purge -u $acc
> I would like to expunge Inbox mailbox every 60 days
> This mailbox is not in the config any I try to use "doveadm expunge".
> But my sh configs doesn't works: Fatal: Invalid search date parameter: 60
>
> I am running roundcube and dovecot on the same machine. To avoid the
> described scenario, I have:
>
> 1. Enabled and configured selinux on that machine,
> 2. Enabled mail-crypt plugin with user keys in dovecot.
>
> This should make it hard for an attacker to get access to the emails
> even
> > Since when does a hacked website gain root? What argument is next, when
> your
> > storage solution is hacked they have access to your files? Are you not
> working
> > with linux? How frequent are exploits that give you a root.
>
> I was responding to jeremy ardley considering root access gain
>
> A web search on 'linux web server exploits that gain root' will give
> many examples.
No, not. And you better get your info for this type of stuff from cve websites
or apache vulnerability list.
> Security design by first principle assumes that an attacker will gain
> root access.
I woul
>
> There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube
> (or any other web mail interface) on the same server as dovecot, a
> breach of the web interface could be quite serious and allow access to
> the complete mail store.
No this is crap. user/group is are preventing this.
>
> On 2023-09-08, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
>
> > The scenario you describe does not consider a breach of the web mail
> service
> > that allows root access to the file system.
> >
> > If the web service is compromised to that extent then the mail file store
> is
> > also compromised.
> >
uppose gentoo stable?) will not allow TLSv1 or
sslv3 connections bei default anymore.
Wild guess: you need to explicitely allow for example DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=0
ciphersuite in postfix to make *your* openssl accept this remote sslv3
connection
Cheers
-Marc
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89
I am totally not experienced with setting up sso etc. I was wondering if/how it
is possible to share an authenticated session between dovecot and the mail
client with the webmail so a user does not need to login again.
___
dovecot mailing list -- d
> I have user database in ldap (samba). I want to use fail2ban to restrict
> unsuccessful login attempts, but... I cannot see "Authentication
> failure" message in ANY log. (/var/log/mail.log shows successful logins
> as well as disconnects.)
> How should I proceed?
Check your dovecot.log
dovecot
I have discovered a whole list of bugs in Outlook 2019 and reported them
constantly at this Q&A of them, up to a point where their advised workarounds
where even contradictory and I got blocked. One bug that surprised me the most
(existing already for years) is that if your outlook profile has i
> I Tried to run the test with imaptest and got a segfault error.
> Debug:
>
> Reading symbols from imaptest...done.
> (gdb) run user="puser%d@am.local" users=0-10 pass=Us123456 host=ha-
> rr.am.local ssl=any-cert clients=10 port=993 - secs=300
> no_pipelining
> Starting program: /usr/bin/
>
>
> A dns query for imap.web.de address records (IN A) returns two ip
> addresses.
>
>
> And I'm betting each IP is a hardware load balancer with crap load of
> servers behind each :)
>
I am converting a bit to containers and there are so many applications that are
not able to proper
> We are slowly but surely FORCED to use external/cloud services as Open
> (and even closed) source tools are no longer use-able on own/private
> infrastructures or need nuclear plan like budget and implementation
> time/ressources (Yes it is a bit exaggerated ;-) )
>
There are still people out t
>
> That simply isn't true, and I am baffled that you don't know that
> replication works with a two server active/active setup for years now!
> Two separate instances (active/active) on two different continents are a
> completely reliable failover scenario for years now.
>
Maybe it works like t
>
> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would
> be overkill.
>
What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovec
1 - 100 of 847 matches
Mail list logo
