On 20/12/2011 05:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.12.2011, at 19.35, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I wonder if anyone has tried using an IMAP server with Amazon S3 as a backend.
There would be many factors to consider (speed, etc). However, moreso, I
don't know that Maildir(++) would support multi
On 23/12/2011 19:20, sottile...@rfx.it wrote:
New box (supposed): CentOS 6.x (32/64 bit ? ), dovecot 2.04, mbox format
Any hints/comment appreciated ;-)
Don't use Dovecot 2.0.4, even if your distro tries to tempt you into
doing so by including such a version.
Whilst it looks like a stable
On 24/12/2011 10:31, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With mbox storage, an IMAP FOLDER contains only sub folders or it contains only
messages. It CANNOT contain BOTH.
Dovecot can store both folders and messages in a folder, under mbox.
See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders
Bill
On 23/07/2011 10:16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
mkdir /usr/src/dovecot_2.0.13
cd /usr/src/dovecot_2.0.13
download i.e
wget ... dovecot_2.0.13-0~auto+24_amd64.changes
wget dovecot_2.0.13-0~auto+24.debian.tar.gz
wget dovecot_2.0.13-0~auto+24.dsc
wget dovecot_2.0.13-0~auto+24_i386.changes
On 22/07/2011 12:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
2. My new apartment gets too hot (30C) when it gets over about 22C
outside, which is almost daily. So my brain melts in the heat and I
don't have energy to do much of anything. But I finally yesterday
bought an air conditioning machine, which should sol
On 18/07/2011 11:27, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
What should I expect performance-wise if I put 20 messages in a
Maildir store and use two or three MUAs (mutt and Thunderbird), on an
Athlon dual core 2GHz with SATA drives in software RAID (Linux)?
Like; would it be useless/crawling, usable or p
On 08/07/2011 11:35, Mike Prispan wrote:
could someone answer my following questions about dovecot indexes?
- If I delete dovecot indexes, it recreates them without any problem,
right?
AFAIK,
for mbox and Maildir: True,
for sdbox and mdbox: False.
- If dovecot recreates indexes, it does no
On 30/06/2011 00:40, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you can live with the folder tree limitations of mbox
Did you mean with or without considering
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders ?
Bill
On 30/06/2011 13:28, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
We are now trying to migrate to the third scenario and using mdbox.
These errors cause a corrupted index and we have to manually
delete the user's index so he could read his mail again.
* I connect then to a server that have no index for me.
On 30/06/2011 14:08, Shazia Javed wrote:
Thank you for the reply. Now I have relatively better understanding of Dovecot
and email service components (MUA, MTA, MRA, etc). However, I am still
struggling with the relevant conceptual understanding, and need your help:
I have installed 'getmail' a
On 30/06/2011 05:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:54 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
I recently tried to look at the Dovecot mailing lists through an
already-configured IMAP profile, which had worked fine in the past.
Yeah, it was broken in two ways. Should be working in a few
I concede that this is most likely a WIBNI (Wouldn't It Be Nice If...)
and most likely will end up on the list of WIBNIs, never to be implemented.
But I would like to take the brainstorm forward another step, just to see.
On 30/06/2011 05:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
To allow for migration of exis
On 29/06/2011 18:00, William Blunn wrote:
Perhaps the per-mailbox index files for sdbox and mdbox should be
re-named to "message metadata databases", and the "map index" should
be renamed to "message store database".
Also it might be an idea to change the filena
be
renamed to "message store database".
Specifically we should avoid the word "index". By including the word
"database", we make it clearer that these files contain data.
Timo, what do you reckon?
Regards,
Bill
On 29/06/2011 17:36, William Blunn wrote:
On 28/06/2011
On 28/06/2011 17:13, Davide Vaghetti wrote:
I have one thousand virtual users with mdbox mailbox format and 10 GByte quota.
I have noticed some performance problem related to I/O (the mailbox disk is a
6TB raid1+0 on ISCSI), so I want to put the index files on a different disk. My
actual mail_
On 29/06/2011 13:19, Shazia Javed wrote:
---
Objective:
---
We need to download emails from remote server using Dovecot and thunderbird.
Dovecot doesn't download e-mail from other servers.
Our objective is to store emails in maildir or mbox form
I recently tried to look at the Dovecot mailing lists through an
already-configured IMAP profile, which had worked fine in the past.
But it failed saying that the authentication method was not supported.
http://www.dovecot.org/mailinglists.html says:
"You can get access to the IMAP archives by
On 23/05/2011 20:47, Adam wrote:
I am currently running v1.1.20 and was wondering if there is any
compelling reason to upgrade to v1.2 or v2.0?
For example is there any security updates in v1.2 or v2.0 that aren't
included in v1.1.20?
The other major thing I would be interested in knowing is
On 21/04/2011 03:32, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
A question about where the mail is actually supposed to be delivered
to...
initially I configured Exim4 to delivery the email to ~/Maildir and I
noticed as you saw in the list directories like ~/Maildir/new and
~/Maildir/cur, however once I configured
On 25/04/2011 05:53, Anshul Chauhan wrote:
i"m using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 on CentOS 5.5, i'm getting freqent
problem of recieving multiple copies of mails received from outside my
domain. this problem comes with some users and not with all the users,
maillog shows the same mail downloaded again
On 12/04/2011 22:35, Carsten Laun-De Lellis wrote:
I hope to get some help on the separator. I am sure that I hava a wrong
understanding what the separator is.
I thaught the separator is the delimiter within the imap folder structure.
The 'separator' directive controls what appears in the IMAP
On 08/04/2011 16:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:03 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
But with the mdbox user, Thunderbird pops up an error:
The current command did not succeed. The mail server for account
responded: Invalid mailbox name: Trash/foo/.
See if
On 08/04/2011 16:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:03 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
But with the mdbox user, Thunderbird pops up an error:
The current command did not succeed. The mail server for account
responded: Invalid mailbox name: Trash/foo/.
See if
Thunderbird 3.1.9 over Windows 7.
Dovecot 2.0.11 (2:2.0.11-0~auto+41 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/
source on 8 Apr 2011) over Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
Trying to set up a Dovecot system with mdbox. But I also wanted to keep
some Maildir. So I ended up with both mdbox and Maildir side-by-side an
On 22/03/2011 13:00, Charles Marcus wrote:
Instead of complaining, why not just fix it (it is a wiki after all) and *then*
post your email explaining the changes you made?
For changes for the better to come to fruition, a number of things need
to happen, only one of which is actually making t
Just having another look at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailServerOverview
, it seems to have some statements in it which are misleading, and some
which are really ... well ... wrong.
Quote: "With the possible, optional, exception of the deliver MDA,
Dovecot is not involved with reception, delive
On 22/03/2011 09:09, Sergiy Kyrylkov wrote:
We are trying to convert all mbox mail on our systems to mdbox using
dsync, in order to be able to use email sub-folders in Thunderbird.
You should not be using 2.0 beta6. You should be using 2.0.11 or later.
You can have folders containing both mess
On 05/01/2011 22:47, Joan Moreau wrote:
# doveconf | grep mdbox
mdbox_preallocate_space = no
mdbox_rotate_interval = 0
mdbox_rotate_size = 2 M
Is the space between the '2' and the 'M' significant?
Only in my configuration file it says "2M" with no space.
I was wondering if the space might ma
On 07/12/2010 15:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migrator to move mail from Exchange 2007 to
my Dovecot 1.0.7 server. The program seem
On 08/11/2010 13:16, William Blunn wrote:
But surely you can fold header records, e.g.
References:
For the avoidance of doubt, the second and third lines of that header
record are supposed to have an additional space character at the beginning.
I did type the required space characters
On 08/11/2010 12:47, Alan Brown wrote:
From: Timo Sirainen
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] emails getting mangled when dragging from
Exchange account to IMAP shared folders
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700, Scott Goodwin wrote:
FYI, I got rawlog working and it shows the same break in the raw
logs
On 28/10/2010 16:04, Peter Reinhold wrote:
Someone wrote (Probably you), and the time was 14:23 28-10-2010
Though this is of course "Paradigm error" or "Trying to ice-skate up
hill".
If you want to access folders, then use IMAP.
This might be, but I like to be able to access my mail via webm
On 28/10/2010 11:26, Peter Reinhold wrote:
In my old setup, a user could have folders on the server, and by using
his login with the mailbox appended, could pop a given folder
specifically.
For instance, logging in with u...@example.com would pop INBOX, and
logging in with user-fol...@example
On 24/10/2010 15:10, Timo Sirainen wrote:
A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists in
Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be actually
using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring this problem.
I thought you were fixing bugs coming o
On 21/10/2010 14:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
Reiserfs is not 'kaput', it is still being maintained in the linux
kernel (both v3 and work is ongoing for v4), and will be for the
foreseeable future.
For the benefit of anyone reading this and wondering "Well is it kaput
or not?": Charles and I are
On 20/10/2010 18:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better:
Linux has fallocate() that can do it for other filesystems than just
XFS. Or looks like it's only XFS and ext4 (ext3 doesn't support it).
On 13/10/2010 19:04, Edward Carraro wrote:
main_script: line 1: error: folder name specified for fileinto command is not
utf-8: ññoéé.
Which versions of things are you using?
There is a thread on a similar topic here
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051780.html
with a reposit
On 13/10/2010 08:08, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Is there any way to limit access to dovecot by domains.
I only need to give access to a well known set of domains, all from
Australia and all networks are known and used either from people at
home or mobile access (phones, laptops etc).
Have you
On 12/10/2010 17:48, Ulf Jaenicke-Rößler wrote:
I'm seeking advice to solve the following "mystery":
I set up an IMAP server on Ubuntu 10.04 (dovecot 1.2.9). It appears to work
fine apart from one problem.
A colleague is running Outlook 2007
I would suggesting considering the use of an IMAP
On 06/10/2010 22:18, Donny Brooks wrote:
dovecot-2.0.1-1_118.fc13.x86_64 installed from atrpm rpm file
2.0.1?
It seems strange to go with an old point version. Would you not be
better off with 2.0.5 ?
Though the latest FC13 binaries I could find were for v2.0.4 to be found at
http://pa
On 08/10/2010 15:02, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
Although i'm aware that version 1.0.15 is rather old, that's what is
used in Lenny, so...
1.0.15 is ancient.
Please consider upgrading to at least 1.2.x.
There is a package for 1.2.13 available in Lenny backports
http://packages.debian.org/lenny-back
On 07/10/2010 20:38, Camron W. Fox wrote:
If we upgrade, then we lose RH support for any future dovecot issues
And if you don't upgrade, you don't get any support from the guy who
wrote Dovecot and therefore knows it inside-out :-)
I tend to suggest the practice of: Keep your server "on dist
On 06/10/2010 14:44, Johan Hendriks wrote:
First of all, i have virtual users, with virtual domains.
Mail is stored in /usr/local/virtual/domain name/user
The following does not have anything to do with the main thrust of your
question, but:
Storage of e-mail does not fit into the purposes n
On 06/10/2010 13:16, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
During norml operation this morning we're seeing a significantly increased load
on the IMAP server (factor 5, from 5 to 25).
Does dovecot need to rebuild index files or perform other IO intensive
operations after the upgrade
On 05/10/2010 15:52, Chris wrote:
I searched every logfile I could find, but without any results :(
How does it usually work?
The mail is send by another server and on my server, does postfix
receive the email or is it dovecots job?
Who puts the mail into that mail directory? I guess it's postf
On 01/10/2010 13:32, arif khwaja wrote:
I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest
version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it
please.
There are some wiki pages about upgrading here:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading
There appears to be s
On 05/10/2010 09:56, arif khwaja wrote:
Is there any easy way to upgrade Dovecot like yum command? Or I have to delete the
current and install the new version then change the setting?>
I will appreciate if you can tell me the steps please?
...
--- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org
On 04/10/2010 14:27, Attila Nagy wrote:
It seems there is an FD leak in this version. The number of open file
descriptors quickly raise after upgrading from 2.0.4. (I haven't got
more time to look after the issue, it may be obvious from the diffs)
You may be probably ten steps ahead of me but
On 30/09/2010 22:17, cajun wrote:
I've read some of the mailing lists looking for information on this.
Thus far, about all I've found is there was a complete rewrite of
Dovecot some time back.
I'm wondering now is it even possible to use the same mbox's from
0.99.13-3 with version 1.0.15-2? I
On 24/09/2010 19:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Just a note to myself and whoever else cares, should be added to wiki once it
has its own page about this:
I have been meaning to say we should have a wiki page about this.
With single-dbox messages can be copied with hard linking. This means tha
On 22/09/2010 05:35, ksri...@yahoo.com wrote:
I intend to use Dovecot without SSL. Hence, I built it without SSL
support. When I am trying start Dovecot, I am getting the following
error message. I have set ssl=no in 10-ssl.conf. Can anyone please let
me know if it is possible to build and run
On 21/09/2010 19:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Wonder if http://dovecot.org/index2.html looks ok.
Interesting. Though for me, the version numbers are too small to be
useful. I tried it through Firefox 3.6.8 and Microsoft's version 8
offering with the same result.
Also I've been wondering about w
On the Dovecot home page http://www.dovecot.org/ we have a link
"Documentation" which links to the Dovecot 1.x wiki (
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ ).
There is a question mark in my mind as to whether that is a good idea
considering as how the current stable version of Dovecot appears to be
2.0.x.
On 21/09/2010 16:14, Edmonds Namasenda wrote:
I have copied the *example-config*s to /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ but
literally every change I make as of v1.* is not valid. I wish to use
protocals IMAP & POP3 then authenticate with shadow and passwd for
system users and mysql for the virtual users.
On 21/09/2010 11:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Daniel Luttermann put forth on 9/21/2010 5:02 AM:
I would also use maildir for all mailboxes instead of mbox for inbox...
Do you have technical justification for this recommendation, or is
this merely "personal preference"? If both exist on NFS storag
On 20/09/2010 12:26, cool.chri...@web.de wrote:
Everytime I try to create a folder under my imap-inbox, I get an error like
"can't upload folder...", but after this message I can see a new folder under
my inbox-folder, but I can't use it ...
With a thundermail-client I can create a subfolder wit
On 18/09/2010 18:43, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I've had clients 'request' nested folders, and it would seem that
maildir is designed with that ability while with mbox it is difficult
and.or impossible to implement (nested can be achieved; but not nested
AND populated in each nest level).
You can, u
On 18/09/2010 18:06, Paul Scott wrote:
Having said that, having mail delivered to mbox files under
/var/mail, but other folders under Maildir might not be the best
configuration:
* to get Dovecot to be able to handle that setup means having two
different mailbox formats which means a namespac
On 18/09/2010 01:15, Paul Scott wrote:
I have just set up a new system on a new hard drive on the same
computer. fetchmail is correctly putting mail in /var/mail/.
Whilst I am no expert on fetchmail, as far as I know fetchmail does not
deliver mail itself but rather passes it on to an MTA. So
On 16/09/2010 16:47, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Actually we use MBOX format for all our IMAP access but users complain
they cannot create subfolders in imap folders, of course they cannot
because of MBOX format ...
Actually you can, under mbox, do mailboxes which contain both messages
and sub-mailbo
On 14/09/2010 16:51, Donny Brooks wrote:
I think I will have to stay with the 1.x branch since we have to stick to using
approved rpm's (internal policy) and fedora 13 does not have a 2.x branch that
I see yet.
I agree sticking to the standard binary packages where possible is
generally a go
On 11/09/2010 20:17, Donny Brooks wrote:
On the old mail server it is: dovecot-1.2.11-3.fc11.x86_64
On the new mail server we are migrating to it is: dovecot-1.2.14-1.fc13.x86_64
currently
Is there a repo out there that I can install 2.0 from? The only one I have
found is atrpms and it is a pa
On 10/09/2010 07:50, Edward avanti wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.9.2010, at 7.00, Noel Butler wrote:
I do take exception to be told this issue can be fixed, but NFS users
are not worth it, which is essentially what he told us, I dare say if
this l
On 08/09/2010 21:17, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
it seems to be a bug in Thunderbird and SeaMonkey:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592633
Now confirmed. David Bienvenu replicated the problem with Thunderbird
(involving connecting to my server running Dovecot 2.0.1), analysed it
an
On 09/09/2010 14:49, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
I am still tuning my dovecot, but I find myself very confortable with it.
I am going to structure my imap folder with a new namespace (somthing you
cannot do with GMail :)
and I can choose the mailbox format.
What is the difference between the two ma
On 06/09/2010 23:54, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
I just recognized a problem concerning subfolders after converting
from maildir to mdbox. Thunderbird and SeaMonkey don´t show folders
that are subfolders of subfolders.
Using Thunderbird or Seamonkey, Folder1 and Folder2 are listed and can
be su
On 06/09/2010 23:54, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
I just recognized a problem concerning subfolders after converting
from maildir to mdbox. Thunderbird and SeaMonkey don´t show folders
that are subfolders of subfolders.
Using Thunderbird or Seamonkey, Folder1 and Folder2 are listed and can
be su
On 08/09/2010 14:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 09:22 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
What's %%h ?
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables says that "%%" expands to "%", so
according to that, "%%h" expands to "%h".
It does.
But I
What's %%h ?
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables says that "%%" expands to "%", so
according to that, "%%h" expands to "%h".
But I have seen people using "%%h", so it must mean something else.
Bill
Bad HTML at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/
This documentation is forDovecot v2.0,
seehttp://wiki1.dovecot.org/
http://wiki1.dovecot.org/>">wiki1 for v1.x documentation.
After "documentation." there is a closing tag with no corresponding
opening tag.
A similar issue appears on http://wiki.
On 06/09/2010 17:30, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:57 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
I think what confused me
I think you're still confused :)
I think you're right.
Under LAYOUT=fs perhaps the default_separator ought to be '.', and
under LAYO
On 06/09/2010 16:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:36 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:LAYOUT=maildir++
Mail for INBOX goes to an mbox file "~/mail/inbox".
Mail for folder "folder" goes to an mbox file "~/mail/.fold
On 06/09/2010 15:07, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:37 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
Whilst documenting LAYOUT=maildir++ under dbox, that got me thinking:
Can we specify :LAYOUT=maildir++ with mbox?
Yes, ever since LAYOUT was added.
If I have it right, this should
On 04/09/2010 16:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.9.2010, at 11.40, William Blunn wrote:
OK, but then it occurred to me, if we can use DIRNAME with Maildir, how about
LAYOUT with dbox?
How about having the ability to specify Maildir++ folder layout under dbox? For
example:
You can
On 03/09/2010 11:13, William Blunn wrote:
I was thinking about documentation for alternate storage.
I have added a new section
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox#Alternate_storage
and made various changes elsewhere
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailLocation/dbox#Alternate_storage
http
Whilst documenting LAYOUT=maildir++ under dbox, that got me thinking:
Can we specify :LAYOUT=maildir++ with mbox?
If I have it right, this should then remove the problem of not being
able to have messages and mail subfolders in the same mail folder.
So for example if we had mail location spec
On 04/09/2010 16:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.9.2010, at 11.40, William Blunn wrote:
OK, but then it occurred to me, if we can use DIRNAME with Maildir, how about
LAYOUT with dbox?
How about having the ability to specify Maildir++ folder layout under dbox? For
example:
You can
On 04/09/2010 16:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.9.2010, at 11.40, William Blunn wrote:
OK, but then it occurred to me, if we can use DIRNAME with Maildir, how about
LAYOUT with dbox?
How about having the ability to specify Maildir++ folder layout under dbox? For
example:
You can
On 04/09/2010 14:27, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
The log shows that the script is called and executed but it is not
able to find or create the mailbox:
Hello Patrick,
I probably can't help you with this problem, but I can mention that
oftentimes if you ask about a problem on this list you may b
On 13/05/2010 10:14, William Blunn wrote:
I am trying out "mdbox" under Dovecot 2.0beta5.
Looking in the "mailboxes" directory under the mdbox storage root
("~/dbox" in my case), I can see that the mail folders are mapped into
filesystem directories.
But Doveco
On 03/09/2010 15:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
With multi-dbox the moving is more complex, but still it only copies
the data in m.* files.
Dovecot always tries to look for the u.123 or m.123 file from primary
storage and if it's not found there, it looks it up from alternate
storage. The state isn
I've updated http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailLocation regarding a typical
mail_location entry for dbox.
Previously it said:
mail_location = dbox:~/dbox
but of course "dbox" is now the old name for "sdbox", so the example
should be updated to say "sdbox" and there might/ought also to be an
e
I was thinking about documentation for alternate storage.
We have a few mentions at:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Altmove
But I was thinking it would be helpful if there could be a page about
alternate
On 02/09/2010 15:03, William Blunn wrote:
On 01/09/2010 20:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:54 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
Sometimes dovecot-2.0 sends this untagged response to clients:
* OK Indexed -2147483648% of the mailbox, ETA 0:00
I imagine there's a bug in
On 01/09/2010 20:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:54 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
Sometimes dovecot-2.0 sends this untagged response to clients:
* OK Indexed -2147483648% of the mailbox, ETA 0:00
I imagine there's a bug in there somewhere.
Well, I guess this fixes it:
h
On 01/09/2010 12:10, Pablo wrote:
Thank you again.
Yes, you're on the way :-)
Problem was that in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf was:
mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/%u/
instead of my new line:
mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/%d/%u/
Are you sure that you want %d/%u and not %d/%n ?
On 31/08/2010 19:00, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 19:31 -0700, Kui Zhang wrote:
location = mdbox:~/mdbox:MAILBOXDIR=expunged
MAILBOXDIR: Ah, another directive which may appear in a location
specification.
So far I can remember:
INBOX
INDEX
MAILBOXDIR
and I think th
Does Dovecot support the use of the INDEX directive for mdbox?
e.g.
mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%u
Bill
On 24/08/2010 15:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've noticed that a lot of people are using e.g.:
mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n
Then either they don't have home directory set, or their home
directory is the same as the maildir.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers/Home explains all the p
On 19/08/2010 11:04, Tamas Kadar wrote:
So we're having some ISP issues lately, meaning we have to reboot our
cable modem like 2-3 times a day. An unfortunate side-effect I've
found is, once the users max out their connection limit (which I've
set to 10, and many people do), if we reboot the ca
On 18/08/2010 13:28, Peter Dungel wrote:
i've set up a little mailserver for my homeoffice, and after some
problems everything works fine for me, I've some virtual users which
get their mail delivered via getmail, and I can access my mails from
my windows mailclient.
The only issue I'm still
On 18/08/2010 08:38, Xavier Pons wrote:
El 17/08/2010 18:57, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 09:35 +0200, Xavier Pons wrote:
>Aug 17 09:22:40 imap1 dovecot: lmtp(19629,miel): Error:
kea6K484akytTAAAJBW4rA: sieve: msgid=
><1099311971.505.1282029699154.javamail.open-xcha...@o.uib.
On 16/08/2010 17:58, Jerrale G wrote:
On 8/16/2010 3:44 AM, ramesh wrote:
Hi All,
I would like have suggestion for changing subdomain (belongs to ISP)
to own domain, the scenario as below.
Presently we have subdomain from ISP ( @xxx.isp.net)
email id : ram...@xxx.isp.net
ISP charges
On 16/08/2010 15:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally.
Brilliant work Timo!
Bill
On 15/08/2010 22:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/15/2010 2:32 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-08-15 14:01:25 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Seems to me that it wouldn't take a lot of code to at lease find if
they have adduser or useradd.
that is 2 out of many solutions.
and depending of the admin he
On 15/08/2010 17:14, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 15.8.2010, at 17.03, Marc Perkel wrote:
Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: service(pop3-login) User doesn't exist:
dovenull
Just some real time feedback. I don't know what dovenull user is or
why it is necessary.
I added now to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/
On 10/08/2010 10:51, Richard Gliebe wrote:
my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
Congratulations. You just installed an old unsupported version.
If you want help from the list, you need to be running 1.2.x or later.
If you distro includes an older version, then that i
Damon Atkins wrote:
Just keep in mine Signed Emails, the email contents needs to be
present back to the client as it came, so the client says the email
has not been altered.
Timo will presumably correct me if I am wrong: I believe it is already a
design goal that messages going in to the mail
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I was thinking it would be nice to be able to compress attachments after
they've already been delivered. Like maybe keep the attachments decoded for a
few weeks and then compress them. Similar to how some people do it with
Maildir. This can't work without a small header, o
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 18:30 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
Consider storing the recovery filter stack in the dbox metadata rather
than the attachment file.
This has a couple of upshots:
1. If one person receives a message with an attachment which is encoded
with base64
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
