>
> I am running roundcube and dovecot on the same machine. To avoid the
> described scenario, I have:
>
> 1. Enabled and configured selinux on that machine,
> 2. Enabled mail-crypt plugin with user keys in dovecot.
>
> This should make it hard for an attacker to get acc
On 2023-09-08, Robert Senger wrote:
> I am running roundcube and dovecot on the same machine. To avoid the
> described scenario, I have:
>
> 1. Enabled and configured selinux on that machine,
yes selinux is a must have
> 2. Enabled mail-crypt plugin with user keys in dovecot.
I am running roundcube and dovecot on the same machine. To avoid the
described scenario, I have:
1. Enabled and configured selinux on that machine,
2. Enabled mail-crypt plugin with user keys in dovecot.
This should make it hard for an attacker to get access to the emails
even with root access
Hi Joe,
The only issue I had, is that for cryptic reasons (FreeBSD 13-STABLE)
"localhost" did not resolve, I had too replace it with "127.0.0.1"
But YMMV
Regards,
Xavier
Le 9/7/23 23:00, joe a a écrit :
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot
On 9/7/2023 17:00:51, joe a wrote:
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
same server?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Placing roundcube on its
nobody here on this list has eternal life nor eternal
resources, so you would be stupid to focus on your webserver root access
exploit instead of roundcube.
Next to that, it is more common these days to use containers so there is not
even a webserver that runs root
act still remains that nobody here on this list has eternal life nor eternal
resources, so you would be stupid to focus on your webserver root access
exploit instead of roundcube.
Next to that, it is more common these days to use containers so the
gain
> root access.
I would not know. Logical deduction of the topic question 'when roundcube gets
hacked' does not include all this.
The OP is correct with his question. The risk of having an undetected exploit
in roundcube code is probably >1x than something with the webse
On 2023-09-08, Marc wrote:
> Since when does a hacked website gain root? What argument is next, when your
> storage solution is hacked they have access to your files? Are you not working
> with linux? How frequent are exploits that give you a root.
I was responding to jeremy ardley considering ro
On 8/9/23 16:24, Marc wrote:
Since when does a hacked website gain root?
A web search on 'linux web server exploits that gain root' will give
many examples.
Security design by first principle assumes that an attacker will gain
root access.
Best practise is to limit the damage that can c
>
> There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube
> (or any other web mail interface) on the same server as dovecot, a
> breach of the web interface could be quite serious and allow access to
> the complete mail store.
No this is crap. user/group is are
t compared to simply
> breaching a
> > web server and locally exploiting it.
> >
> > When the dovecot server is on a remote system and correct firewalls are
> in
> > place, then the attacker has to breach the imap protocols as well
>
> But if root access is gained
dovecot server is on a remote system and correct firewalls are in
place, then the attacker has to breach the imap protocols as well
But if root access is gained on the web server, root access is also
gained on roundcube. And mails, the important thing to protect, can be
freely read/deleted. At
en the dovecot server is on a remote system and correct firewalls are in
> place, then the attacker has to breach the imap protocols as well
But if root access is gained on the web server, root access is also
gained on roundcube. And mails, the important thing to protect, can be
freely read/de
El 8/9/23 a les 0:50, jeremy ardley via dovecot ha escrit:
On 8/9/23 05:00, joe a wrote:
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
same server?
There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube
(or any other web mail interface) on the same
On 8/9/23 07:38, dovecot--- via dovecot wrote:
Roundcube does not have direct file access to the emails even on the
same server. Roundcube opens a connection to dovecot, supplies the
user/pass/login credentials to dovecot, and dovecot fetches the email
stores and serves it to roundcube
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the same
server?
There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube (or any
other web mail interface) on the same server as dovecot, a breach of the web
interface could be quite serious and allow access
On 8/9/23 05:00, joe a wrote:
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
same server?
There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube
(or any other web mail interface) on the same server as dovecot, a
breach of the web interface could be
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 05:00:51PM -0400, joe a wrote:
> Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the same
> server?
>
No!
___
> dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
> To unsubscribe send an emai
Thanks.
On 9/7/2023 17:09:25, robert k Wild wrote:
Simple answer is no issues at all, I've done it all on the same server and
my server has
Postfix, dovecote and roundcube
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023, 22:05 joe a, wrote:
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
On 9/7/23 17:00, joe a wrote:
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
same server?
I'm running two such installations; no difficulty.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
___
dovecot ma
Simple answer is no issues at all, I've done it all on the same server and
my server has
Postfix, dovecote and roundcube
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023, 22:05 joe a, wrote:
> Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
>
Any known issues with installing/running roundcube and dovecot on the
same server?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Due to a recent topic regarding the performance of the Roundcube webmailer with
Dovecot as a backend, I set up imapproxy successfully, shrinking the response
latency of the webmailer heavily, which is great.
However, I still encounter strange timeouts on some requests when Roundcube
tries to
Am 26.01.2023 21:25 schrieb Marc :>
> Generally speaking the setup performs OK, I wrote a JMeter Roundcube script to
> test the Roundcube. This includes actions like listing mails and fetching
> them. I am hitting a somehow dubious limit of 600 req/s though. (This includes
> al
>
> Generally speaking the setup performs OK, I wrote a JMeter Roundcube script to
> test the Roundcube. This includes actions like listing mails and fetching
> them. I am hitting a somehow dubious limit of 600 req/s though. (This includes
> all kinds of HTTP calls to Roundcube, no
are you running (squirrelmail's) imapproxy on the roundcube machine? it
keeps user imap connections active to dovecot, meaning that roundcube
doesn't have to constantly log back in via imap for each operation.
that might help somewhat.
(we just use the debian package version of imap
Good day,
I am currently setting up/debugging a webmailer-only setup using Roundcube
(latest version) with Dovecot (2.3.20, latest as of now).
Generally speaking the setup performs OK, I wrote a JMeter Roundcube script to
test the Roundcube. This includes actions like listing mails and
; $config['managesieve_conn_options'] = [
>>> 'ssl' => [
>>> 'verify_peer' => false,
>>> 'peer_name' => 'FQDN of mailserver',
>>> ],
>>> ];
>>>
>>> This probably even w
7;peer_name' => 'FQDN of mailserver',
>> ],
>> ];
>>
>> This probably even works without the "verify_peer" line, haven't tested.
>>
>
>I added the block above to my managesieve configuration in Roundcube and now
>connected to a
nstead of
>> the internal IP address and now it works!
> Good to hear it works now :)
>
>> Why would using the fqdn work, but not the internal LAN IP address?
> The client, here php / roundcube checks if the presented certificate contains
> the address it connecte
internal LAN IP address?
The client, here php / roundcube checks if the presented certificate
contains the address it connected to and ip addresses are very seldomly
added as hosts to certificates.
As a side note, I am now remembering that in my main Roundcube config,
I had to use the fqdn for th
So, I changed the $config['managesieve_host'] = 'tls://mail.mydomain.com’; to
the fqdn of my mail server instead of the internal IP address and now it works!
Why would using the fqdn work, but not the internal LAN IP address?
As a side note, I am now remembering that in my main R
I added “login” to my auth_mechanisms line in
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-auth.conf. That line already looked like
auth_mechanisms = plain
This is what the line looks like now: auth_mechanisms = plain login
I restarted dovecot and it still is not advertising anything after
“SASL” in the sieve log fil
On Jul 10, 2022, at 5:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2022-07-11 00:38, Austin Witmer wrote:
>
>> Jul 10 22:33:27 mail dovecot: managesieve-login: Disconnected (no auth
>> attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=10.116.0.3, lip=10.116.0.2, TLS,
>> session=<7
On 2022-07-11 00:38, Austin Witmer wrote:
Jul 10 22:33:27 mail dovecot: managesieve-login: Disconnected (no auth
attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=10.116.0.3, lip=10.116.0.2, TLS,
session=<7VswBnvjXuIKdAAD>
roundcube send no user login to dovecot managesived, thats why it fai
See below.
> On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:03 PM, Christian Kivalo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022-07-10 23:10, Austin Witmer wrote:
>> Ok, I changed to $config['managesieve_host'] = 'tls://10.116.0.2’; and
>> the below is the log from /var/www/roundcube/logs/siev
On 2022-07-10 23:10, Austin Witmer wrote:
Ok, I changed to $config['managesieve_host'] = 'tls://10.116.0.2’; and
the below is the log from /var/www/roundcube/logs/sieve.log during a
connection attempt. Does this log give you any clues?
[10-Jul-2022 14:59:48 -0600]: S:
Ok, I changed to $config['managesieve_host'] = 'tls://10.116.0.2’; and the
below is the log from /var/www/roundcube/logs/sieve.log during a connection
attempt. Does this log give you any clues?
[10-Jul-2022 14:59:48 -0600]: S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot (Ubuntu)
fig as below requires you to use tls:// prefix in
the managesieve configuration. I just tried it with my server and it
worked. Use:
$config['managesieve_host'] = 'tls://10.116.0.2';
You have debug logging enabled in your roundcube managesieve config, the
output should be in yo
#managesieve_implementation_string = Dovecot Pigeonhole
>
> # Explicitly specify the SIEVE and NOTIFY capability reported by the server
> # before login. If left unassigned these will be reported dynamically
> # according to what the Sieve interpreter supports by default (after lo
pile_errors = 5
# Refer to 90-sieve.conf for script quota configuration and configuration of
# Sieve execution limits.
}
Here is the output of testing with openssl from the roundcube server.
I ran this: openssl s_client -connect 10.116.0.2:4190 On Jul 10, 2022, at 2:17 AM, Tomas Habarta wrote:
&
>And here is my managesieve configuration from my roundcube server.
>/var/www/roundcube/plugins/managesieve/config.inc.php
>
>
>$config['managesieve_port'] = 4190;
>
>$config['managesieve_host'] = 'ssl://10.116.0.2';
Did you enable ssl on t
Hello all!
I’ve got a bit of a problem that I would like some help with. So, I have two
servers, one is my mail server running postfix, dovecot etc. I have a second
server setup as my roundcube server. Both servers are running on the same LAN
network.
I have sieve scripts setup in dovecot in
.
$config['managesieve_usetls'] = true;
I'd set this option to false, and control the connection type by use
of
ssl:// or tls:// prefix in managesieve_host. ssl + tls does not make
sense.
$config['managesieve_debug'] = true;
Did you check logs/sieve.log?
--
Aleksan
managesieve_auth_type'] = PLAIN;
>
> Try null, and PLAIN should be in quotes.
>
> > $config['managesieve_usetls'] = true;
>
> I'd set this option to false, and control the connection type by use of
> ssl:// or tls:// prefix in managesieve_host. ssl +
false, and control the connection type by use of
ssl:// or tls:// prefix in managesieve_host. ssl + tls does not make sense.
$config['managesieve_debug'] = true;
Did you check logs/sieve.log?
--
Aleksander Machniak
Kolab Groupware Developer[https://kolab.o
Here’s some more information:
When attemtping to load the filters configuration on Roundcube, I see this in
Dovecot’s logs:
Jun 06 23:25:30 mx1.la1.blah.com dovecot[693354]: managesieve-login:
Disconnected: Too many invalid commands. (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>,
rip=192.168
Dne 05. 06. 22 v 4:27 Jeremy Hansen napsal(a):
Any pointers to get dovecot configured with sieve for Roundcube filters?
Things I’ve found through search seem a bit all over the place. I’m
using CentOS 8/Rocky Linux hosts.
Thanks
managesieve plugin for roundcube should be able to
On 05/06/2022 10.27, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
Any pointers to get dovecot configured with sieve for Roundcube filters?
Things I’ve found through search seem a bit all over the place. I’m using
CentOS 8/Rocky Linux hosts.
There's a script used by Hestia Control panel to do this. Althoug
Any pointers to get dovecot configured with sieve for Roundcube filters? Things
I’ve found through search seem a bit all over the place. I’m using CentOS
8/Rocky Linux hosts.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
My mail server is self-hosted. I think I would rather integrate Apache
solr with Dovecot than transferring mailboxes from the server onto my
laptop.
Thank you for your suggestion though.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:55:02PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>> My advice for anyone who wants to be able to keep and search very large
>> monolithic mailstores would be: synchronise (e.g. via
>> https://isync.sourceforge.io/ or fetchmail or getmail or rsync or Unison
>> or what
> However, Gmail's web interface, and Gmail's proprietary mobile apps,
> almost certainly do *not* use IMAP2 to communicate with the Gmail
> servers. As has already been pointed out in this thread, they likely
> use a proprietary protocol optimised for that proprietary environment.
Noted and take
> Regarding your next email on this thread, the initial sync of a large
> number of messages via IMAP does take a really long time. But once the
> initial sync is complete, syncing the differences is very fast. The big
> problem with accessing a large folder via a webmail app like
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:51:18PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> I believe Gmail is using IMAP. The instructions for configuring Gmail
> email accounts in Outlook specifically mention IMAP server hostname:
>
> imap.gmail.com
>
> TCP Port 993, SSL
Gmail offers an IMAP2 endpoint
Dear Shawn Heisey,
Noted with thanks. I shall probably try it one of these coming weekends.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 22:10, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 4/20/22 08:03, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Mi
email on this thread, the initial sync of a large
number of messages via IMAP does take a really long time. But once the
initial sync is complete, syncing the differences is very fast. The big
problem with accessing a large folder via a webmail app like Roundcube
is that it never sets up a local
On 4/20/22 08:03, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Dear Shawn Heisey,
Your instructions for integrating Apache SOLR with Dovecot is too much
for me to understand. Do you have links/URLs to excellent guides for
doing this?
Here's the dovecot manual page on it:
https://doc.dovecot.org/con
, 18 Apr 2022 at 07:27, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 4/17/2022 7:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> > My Dovecot, Postfix, Roundcube and Squirrelmail were automatically
> > installed, configured and deployed by Virtualmin web hosting control
> > panel install s
> My advice for anyone who wants to be able to keep and search very large
> monolithic mailstores would be: synchronise (e.g. via
> https://isync.sourceforge.io/ or fetchmail or getmail or rsync or Unison
> or whatever) those mailstores from the server onto your local
> filesystem; use maildir on y
I believe Gmail is using IMAP. The instructions for configuring Gmail
email accounts in Outlook specifically mention IMAP server hostname:
imap.gmail.com
TCP Port 993, SSL
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 07:26:10PM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I would bet that if you accessed a gmail folder with 5 million
> messages in it using IMAP, you would have similar problems with it to
> those that have been described here in this thread. IMAP is a
> beautiful protocol, but I don't t
On 4/19/2022 5:12 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
It is not true that no email system was ever designed for 200,000 or
more emails.
If I did not remember wrongly, more than 10 years ago, I used to have
a Gmail email account, with 4-5 MILLION email messages in the Inbox.
There was no p
The emails appeared in my Gmail inbox. Then sometime later the emails
disappeared mysteriously. Not sure who deleted my emails from my Gmail
email account.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 06:42, Joseph T
For me, it is not because of Gmail spam filters. I confirm I had the
emails in my inbox previously, and then sometime later the emails were
deleted mysteriously. Not sure who deleted my emails. Definitely not
because of Gmail spam filters.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Ind
Recently, I discovered that some emails in one of my Gmail email
accounts were missing. Not sure if Gmail/Google had deleted my email
messages.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 15:36, Marc wrote:
>
> > Gm
I am planning to delete a lot of useless emails, which takes up a huge
proportion of the 200,000 emails in my inbox.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 14:49, Sam Kuper wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 03
I used to have 4-5 MILLION email messages in my Gmail email account,
more than 10 years ago.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
20 Apr 2022 Wednesday
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 06:23, Joseph Tam wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet
189K Feb 20 08:05
> 1645362313.M247319P37919.mail18.scom.ca,S=193354,W=196073:2,S
> -rw---1 vmail vmail uarch 182K Feb 20 08:05
> 1645362313.M68190P39861.mail18.scom.ca,S=186263,W=10:2,S
>
> fyi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Happy Monday !!!
> Thank
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Sami Ketola wrote:
In practice, though, Gmail used to exhibit search/browse bugs (e.g.
failing to identify all relevant mails/threads) annoyingly often. This
was sometimes true via the official Gmail web interface, and was
especially true via the official mobile app, on at
> On 19. Apr 2022, at 10.36, Marc wrote:
>
>> Gmail is *advertised* as working that way.
>>
>> In practice, though, Gmail used to exhibit search/browse bugs (e.g.
>> failing to identify all relevant mails/threads) annoyingly often. This
>> was sometimes true via the official Gmail web interf
> Gmail is *advertised* as working that way.
>
> In practice, though, Gmail used to exhibit search/browse bugs (e.g.
> failing to identify all relevant mails/threads) annoyingly often. This
> was sometimes true via the official Gmail web interface, and was
> especially true via the official mobil
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 03:23:10PM -0700, Joseph Tam wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet) wrote:
>> As for the 200,000+ emails in the inbox no email system was ever
>> designed for that - ever.
>> ...
>> no system will support 200,000 + emails, even if the server can
>> handl
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet) wrote:
As for the 200,000+ emails in the inbox no email system was ever designed for
that - ever.
...
no system will support 200,000 + emails, even if the server can handle that
and running imap where you only download the headers the email cl
th
Whitby, Ontario - Canada
L1N 4S3
Toronto 416.642.7266
Main 1.866.411.7266
Fax 1.888.892.7266
On 4/17/2022 5:19 AM, dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org wrote:
On 2022-04-17 05:32, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Subject: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for
anything + cannot
On 4/17/2022 7:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
My Dovecot, Postfix, Roundcube and Squirrelmail were automatically
installed, configured and deployed by Virtualmin web hosting control
panel install scripts.
How do I integrate Apache SOLR searching capability with Dovecot? Are
there
Dear Shawn Heisey,
My Dovecot, Postfix, Roundcube and Squirrelmail were automatically
installed, configured and deployed by Virtualmin web hosting control
panel install scripts.
How do I integrate Apache SOLR searching capability with Dovecot? Are
there any excellent guides for this?
Thank you
On 4/16/2022 11:32 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything
because there are more than 200,000 emails in my Inbox.
Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot open many emails
because there are more than 200,000 emails
Subject: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for
anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200,000
emails in my Inbox
Good day from Singapore,
I am using Virtualmin/Webmin web hosting control panel in my Virtual
Private Servers (VPS) in Germany.
[1st issue
On 1/8/22 3:04 PM, William Edwards wrote:
After that's working, then move on to Roundcube. Look in
Roundcube's config.inc.php file. Where that file is located is
system-dependend; mine is in /opt/local/etc/roundcube, which is
specific to SmartOS. Parameter "$config['db_ds
Dave McGuire schreef op 2022-01-08 18:20:
On 1/8/22 11:27 AM, Ken Wright wrote:
MariaDB. Now it's time for me to clarify. The "source stream
returned
no data" error is in Evolution; the "connection to storage server
failed" is in Roundcube. So I'm seeing si
On 1/8/22 11:27 AM, Ken Wright wrote:
MariaDB. Now it's time for me to clarify. The "source stream returned
no data" error is in Evolution; the "connection to storage server
failed" is in Roundcube. So I'm seeing similar errors in two different
email clients tr
t; > "Source stream returned no data”. At least to me, that's
> > > > > > not particularly informative. Is it any more informative
> > > > > > to anyone else?
> > > > >
> > > > > The last time I hit that, I'm pre
The last time I hit that, I'm pretty sure it was because I
was going to port 80 instead of port 443 to reach Roundcube.
I'm using port 143 for receiving and 587 for sending; I didn't
think 443 was for email. Am I mistaken? (Not at all unlikely!)
Nono, for your web browser&
3.4.13, Dovecot 2.3.7.2) I get a response saying "Source stream
>>>>> returned no data”. At least to me, that's not particularly
>>>>> informative. Is it any more informative to anyone else?
>>>>
>>>> The last time I hit that,
turned no data”. At least to me, that's not particularly
> > > > informative. Is it any more informative to anyone else?
> > >
> > > The last time I hit that, I'm pretty sure it was because I
> > > was going to port 80 instead of port 443 to reach Rou
The last time I hit that, I'm pretty sure it was because I was
going to port 80 instead of port 443 to reach Roundcube.
I'm using port 143 for receiving and 587 for sending; I didn't think
443 was for email. Am I mistaken? (Not at all unlikely!)
Nono, for your web browser&
e, that's not particularly
> > informative. Is it any more informative to anyone else?
>
> The last time I hit that, I'm pretty sure it was because I was
> going to port 80 instead of port 443 to reach Roundcube.
I'm using port 143 for receiving and 587 for sending; I
The last time I hit that, I'm pretty sure it was because I was going
to port 80 instead of port 443 to reach Roundcube.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
When I try to log in to my mail server (ubuntu 20.04, Postfix 3.4.13,
Dovecot 2.3.7.2) I get a response saying "Source stream returned no
data”. At least to me, that's not particularly informative. Is it any
more informative to anyone else?
Ken
Aki;
I know most likely this isn't dovecot's fault, however upgrading from
2.3.8 to 2.3.16 broke the password plugin for roundcube. Im only asking
if you might know what changes in dovecot might have caused this
incompatibility so i can fix it myself or point roundcube in the right
On 09-07-2021 19:15, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS] wrote:
This is a new setup, running on RHEL 8 with the latest everything.
Has anyone out there set up a high availability pair of Dovecot
servers - with Roundcube and PostfixAdmin - successfully ?
Yes. NFS or GlusterFS for shared
each node, DNS A/PTR records for the clients
pointing to the virtual ip.
you may have a look to
https://blog.sys4.de/loadbalancing-mit-keepalived-postfix-dovecot-de.html
its old but the loadbalancing part
maybe good enough as a pointer
I separated Roundcube from the mail server and have
pointing
to the virtual ip.
I separated Roundcube from the mail server and have them running on two separate VM's as i didn't want to expose the webserver on the mail servers
to the Internet.
There is also keepalived on the two webmail VM's for a virtual ip where the
users c
This is a new setup, running on RHEL 8 with the latest everything.
Has anyone out there set up a high availability pair of Dovecot servers - with
Roundcube and PostfixAdmin - successfully ?
"Callahan's Law: Shared pain is lessened; shared joy, increased — thus do we
refute entrop
Hello,
Can someone guide me how to test the mail software? I can send emails but
can't receive. I have Dovecot - telnet to 143 port says Dovecot OK. Same
with port 25. I get back mail delivery problem. 550. No mail shows in
Roundcube. Log files maillog shows nothing, seems empty. It&#x
On 2020-09-17 20:20, Ranbir wrote:
This is the pam error:
auth-worker(4474): pam(ranbir,1.2.3.4,):
pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (password
mismatch?)
Replying to myself here...
I managed to fix the pam problem once I realized that Roundcube didn't
know what to do
gt;
> auth-worker(4474): pam(ranbir,1.2.3.4,):
> pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (password
> mismatch?)
Does anyone have any insight? I'm stumped. Why is Evolution working
with both accounts and only one from roundcube?
If I switch back to ldap lookups, all logins a
on. I have one account authenticating
with GSSAPI, which is my userid for logging into my desktop and for
email. The other account in Evolution is logging in using PLAIN and is
only used for email (it's shell is set to /sbin/nologin).
The problem is with roundcube: I can login with the sec
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
