ED] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
Sent: 07 September 2004 20:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
Paul, James and Mitchell,
Many thanks for your feedback, and any ideas as to fixes are most welcome.
Mitchell;
> I don't mind the reg-hack so much, it's
Hi Mitchell,
OK I figured it out. Because I have 3 monitors when the task bar is on the
bottom in its standard position its way too wide, I can hardly reach over to get
to the Quick Launch. >> works with Dave's. But I have the task bar set
vertically on the left side of the screen and in that c
* 2 = if search bar width is
greater than clocklongwidth [default] */showbutton =
1;
Paul
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell
WaiteSent: 08 September 2004 06:41To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD
at case the >> is not at the bottom
of the search window. Bug?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004
1:48 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and
Windows XP SP2
I still get the
I still get the >> too.
--
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Waite
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Win
OTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
Paul, James and Mitchell,
Many thanks for your feedback, and any ideas as to fixes are most welcome.
Mitchell;
> I don't mind the reg-hac
Paul, James and Mitchell,
Many thanks for your feedback, and any ideas as to fixes are most welcome.
Mitchell;
> I don't mind the reg-hack so much, it's the loss of the popup
> menu that depresses me.
Do you mean the popup menu controlled by the little >> icon? That doesn't
work for you?
It ac
10:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> I don't mind the reg-hack so much, it's the loss of the popup menu that
> depresses me. I really learned a great deal about the web from that
> collection of sites, and I loved the way
ld be "slick" enough to appeal to Dad.
--
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Robertson
> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users]
get it to work with SP2, it will just take time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Robertson
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
Kim -
I hadn't
Kim -
I hadn't appreciated the DQSD architecture issues,
especially with it already being hosted by the taskbar
process. I've got to say that it amazes me that
there's not any clear way of addresing the issue.
Personally, I might go back to XP SP1 - SP2 has
crippled my digital radio and nobody's c
oper.
--
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
> Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> Hi James,
Hi James,
> Thanks for the reply. I know I'm going to feel awkward about
> making this suggestion since I can't code it up, but... I've
> got a feeling that the only way to get DQSD working properly
> under XP SP2 (even taking into account the available registry
> hack) might be to wrap up (i.
Kim -
Thanks for the reply. I know I'm going to feel awkward
about making this suggestion since I can't code it up,
but... I've got a feeling that the only way to get
DQSD working properly under XP SP2 (even taking into
account the available registry hack) might be to wrap
up (i.e. host) DQSD in a
James and all,
> > I've done that (the key already existed) and the basic problem with
> > DQSD is solved in so far as DQSD runs when my machine boots into XP
> > SP2, *but* I'm still getting the script disabling problem
> and warnings
> > popping up when new windows are opened by the comx.xml
tson
> Sent: den 30 augusti 2004 21:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> Kim -
>
> You posted a message a few weeks ago re. XP SP2 and modifying
> a registry key to enable javascript etc.
> originating from a local machine,
Kim -
You posted a message a few weeks ago re. XP SP2 and
modifying a registry key to enable javascript etc.
originating from a local machine, specifically by
doing the following:
Add a DWORD value to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet
Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_LOCALMACHINE
Okay attached is what I have so far. Haven't tested it yet so it might
have a glaring error or two. Haven't had as much time to figure it out as
I thought I would and probably won't the next couple days as my laptop is
about to go down due to bad power cord and dead battery.
Thad
> Hey, great, yo
Hi Thad,
Sounds good!
Yeah, the deal is that you update the dqsdweb project, and dqsd.net
automatically updates from there.
Thanks,
Kim
Thad Kerosky wrote:
Hey, great, you had me worried.
So maybe we should go and add it to the installer. I have time to work
with it today and tomorrow. We can h
Hey, great, you had me worried.
So maybe we should go and add it to the installer. I have time to work
with it today and tomorrow. We can have the installer log the current
status of the explorer.exe key and then set it to 0 if they person
agrees. I'm not sure how detecting windows version works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on :
> Hi Ken,
>
> > So whatever is causing these problems, despite their
> having appeared
> > for two successive boots after the registry edit, it's not the
> > registry edit, and they are appearing sort of randomly--on
> some boots,
> > but not others.
>
> I'm
Hi Ken,
> So whatever is causing these problems, despite their having appeared
> for two successive boots after the registry edit, it's not the
> registry edit, and they are appearing sort of randomly--on some boots,
> but not others.
I'm very glad to hear it wasn't related, even if it ails me to h
--
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
>>> Blake Sent: den 9 augusti 2004 20:22
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>>>
>>>> Hi Ken,
>>>&
gt;> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
>> Blake Sent: den 9 augusti 2004 20:22
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>>
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>>> I did this and it fixed the problem. However
Hi Ken,
Sorry to say I have no further ideas... That's really strange.
Kim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Blake
> Sent: den 9 augusti 2004 20:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users]
lake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
>> Blake Sent: den 9 augusti 2004 17:49
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>>
>>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> I did this and it fixed the problem. However, it breaks two programs
> here:
>
> 1. I run a little background program called QuickReply
> (http://www.erstenware.com/?qr2). It runs as an icon in
ty checks, but you
> can probably
> live with that. I think this is currently the only way to
> keep DQSD working.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Kim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
>> Blake
Thad Kerosky wrote:
Maybe we should get a registry file up on the website with the little SP2
tweak and the disclaimer now that the release is imminent. Or on
sourceforge.
Yup, that sounds like a good idea. We should really look into the
security implications of doing this, though, and make sure w
>>> Yes, kind-of. We've been experimenting with different
>>> solutions to this problem...
>>
>> (I don't run XP on any of my machines, so have no way of testing
> this)
>>
>> Does adding www.dqsd.net to your "trusted sites" in IE and then
>> including the 'mark of the web tag' in the HTML file no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on :
>> Yes, kind-of. We've been experimenting with different
>> solutions to this problem...
>
> (I don't run XP on any of my machines, so have no way of testing
this)
>
> Does adding www.dqsd.net to your "trusted sites" in IE and then
> including the 'mark of the we
> Yes, kind-of. We've been experimenting with different
> solutions to this problem...
(I don't run XP on any of my machines, so have no way of testing this)
Does adding www.dqsd.net to your "trusted sites" in IE and then
including the 'mark of the web tag' in the HTML file not work?
Add the dow
,
> Kim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
>> Blake Sent: den 8 augusti 2004 19:37
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>>
>> SP2 blocks DQSD&#x
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Blake
> Sent: den 8 augusti 2004 19:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [DQSD-Users] DQSD and Windows XP SP2
>
> SP2 blocks DQSD's use of Active X Controls. Is there a way to
> all
SP2 blocks DQSD's use of Active X Controls. Is there a way to allow it
for DQSD while denying it for others?
Ken Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal
35 matches
Mail list logo
