On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 23:50, Jens Owen wrote:
> For the drivers you've ported to your OS independent templates (radeon,
> r128 and mga), it looks like the *_drv.c and Makefile support are all
> that's left in the OS directories. If you can get these out of there,
> even by adding a few OS ifde
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 23:12, Jens Owen wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>
> > Log message:
> > The drmCommand interface was passing a size to DRM_IOR() and friends,
> > when DRM_IOR was expecting a type, so on BSD only an int was copied in/out of
> > the kernel. Make drmCommand use new DRM_I
Eric Anholt wrote:
>>Log message:
>> Include protection against ioctl() definition only in the __FreeBSD__ and
>> XFree86Server case. These two drm.h's probably should be shared.
>>
>
> With this commit radeon, r128, and mga are all working on FreeBSD and
> Linux. Haven't tested tdfx, but I
Eric Anholt wrote:
> Log message:
> The drmCommand interface was passing a size to DRM_IOR() and friends,
> when DRM_IOR was expecting a type, so on BSD only an int was copied in/out of
> the kernel. Make drmCommand use new DRM_IOC(), which expects a size.
Good catch! I'm surprised this
> Log message:
> Include protection against ioctl() definition only in the __FreeBSD__ and
> XFree86Server case. These two drm.h's probably should be shared.
With this commit radeon, r128, and mga are all working on FreeBSD and
Linux. Haven't tested tdfx, but I have no reason to not expect
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 17:43, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 00:24, John J. Tobin wrote:
>
> > Alright, I have it built, took long enough on my K6-2 laptop but I have
> > having some problems. Glxinfo reports that there is direct rendering and
> > everything but if I try to run
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:43:35PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Without looking at the code, my guess is that the GL_DECAL env mode
> with an RGBA texture probably isn't implemented in hardware. Hardware
> from that era often had limitations that prevented some combinations
> of texture env modes a
some of the current desktop managers has those "dial home"
feature with the fault handler built in. each crash could
get sent to the development team if the user likes it.
Maybe improved crash logging should get an integral feature
of X11 on general platforms (of course embedded folks wont like
I'll first get a nice easy script working. If it proves a hit with
developers, I'll script out a gdb backtrace on the X server, just in
case it crashed. This might require a small X client that keeps trying
to update itself (say, every second), which triggers the backtrace when
it fails. Just a
On Thursday 27 June 2002 00:18, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:22:16PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > Hello, I have some money to spend (finally!!!) so I'm thinking
> >of replacing my old G400MAX for a new card, as I prefer open source, I
> >have to choose between ATI
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:48:30AM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 19:16, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> >
> > It builds now, so could you 'cvs update' build, install, and check
> > everything is working.
>
> I had some problem building it in mesa/src/drv/s3v
>
> In s3v_co
O.k. I've just fixed this issue.
Alan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:20:10PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> - Forwarded message from David Bronaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:54:29 -0700
> From: David Bronaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Annouce: S
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 19:16, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> It builds now, so could you 'cvs update' build, install, and check
> everything is working.
I had some problem building it in mesa/src/drv/s3v
In s3v_context.h (215) I have something like "drm_s3v_sarea_t". Where
other drivers seems to hav
Michael Schlueter wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> sorry for disturb you again.
>
> Am Sam, 2002-06-22 um 00.00 schrieb Brian Paul:
>
>>Most of the DRI drivers have a per-context field called 'Fallback'.
>>It's a bitmask which records various reasons why we need to fallback
>>to software rendering. In t
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 00:24, John J. Tobin wrote:
> Alright, I have it built, took long enough on my K6-2 laptop but I have
> having some problems. Glxinfo reports that there is direct rendering and
> everything but if I try to run glxgears the system hard locks. The specs
> are:
> Sager NP9800 l
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:35, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:48, John J. Tobin wrote:
>
> >
> > Is the Virge MX+ supported? This is the one that was commonly found in
> > notebooks, as that is what I will be testing it out on.
> >
> Yep. That is the laptop on which I deve
- Forwarded message from David Bronaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:54:29 -0700
From: David Bronaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Annouce: S3 Virge binary snapshots (Was: CVS Update: xc
(branch: s3virge-0-0-1-branch))
To: Jos Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:22:16PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> Hello, I have some money to spend (finally!!!) so I'm thinking
>of replacing my old G400MAX for a new card, as I prefer open source, I
>have to choose between ATI and Matrox, and the optios (for me) are
>the new Parhelia
Hello, I have some money to spend (finally!!!) so I'm thinking
of replacing my old G400MAX for a new card, as I prefer open source, I
have to choose between ATI and Matrox, and the optios (for me) are
the new Parhelia 512 or the AIW Radeon 8500 DV, I'll buy whatever card
works better under
Hi Brian,
sorry for disturb you again.
Am Sam, 2002-06-22 um 00.00 schrieb Brian Paul:
> Most of the DRI drivers have a per-context field called 'Fallback'.
> It's a bitmask which records various reasons why we need to fallback
> to software rendering. In the case of the mga (G400) driver you'l
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:38:03PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:04:27AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> > o.k. it's builds now, max needs to check it runs o.k.
>> >
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Perhaps something was
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:22:07PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:44:14PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
>> > Alan, hint? (Or "How have you just done now with the s3virge branch?")
>>
>> cvs update -j HEAD
>>
>> and resolve the
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:44:14PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> > Alan, hint? (Or "How have you just done now with the s3virge branch?")
>
> cvs update -j HEAD
>
> and resolve the conflicts by hand.
OK, I can do that. I guess it'll be about the sam
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:38:03PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:04:27AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > o.k. it's builds now, max needs to check it runs o.k.
> >
>
> I've tested and I still get errors when building it:
>
> gcc -c -O2 -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstr
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:04:27AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> o.k. it's builds now, max needs to check it runs o.k.
>
I've tested and I still get errors when building it:
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-extern
Good boys! Can anyone invent the way to do the same thing with gdb? So
on X crash one could get backtrace without remote debugging...
Cheers,
Sergey
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | S
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:44:14PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> Alan, hint? (Or "How have you just done now with the s3virge branch?")
cvs update -j HEAD
and resolve the conflicts by hand.
Alan.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:51:18PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 16:48, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>
>> Are the ProSavage docs you have enough to get a good start on Savage4?
>
>their 3D engine is nearly identical. Er, I forgot, I got Savage4 docs
>too from S3/VIA. I am defin
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 16:48, José Fonseca wrote:
> Are the ProSavage docs you have enough to get a good start on Savage4?
their 3D engine is nearly identical. Er, I forgot, I got Savage4 docs
too from S3/VIA. I am definetly the luckiest coder on Earth ; )
So on a Savage4 running my hack you wi
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 19:16, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I'll try and give you a hand on this now.
T H A N K S
Be my guest in case you travel to Italy ; )
> It builds now, so could you 'cvs update' build, install, and check
> everything is working.
Ok. I am doing cvs update right now ; ) I w
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
[...]
>>
>> Yep. That's it. Basically one needs to checkout the trunk, tag it with
>> the new mach64-0-0-5-branch, and then merge from the old branch (by
>> doing cvs update -r mach64-0-0-4-b
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:52:00PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
> >On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >Jose, I think now would be a good time for us to merge the t
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:52:00PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
>> [...]
>> >Jose, I think now would be a good time for us to merge the trunk into a
>> >new Mach64 branch. Brian released Me
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
> [...]
> >Jose, I think now would be a good time for us to merge the trunk into a
> >new Mach64 branch. Brian released Mesa 4.0.3 and the trunk looks like
> >it's been updated, and we need
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:59:06PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > > I'll do the merge now for you.
> > >
> > > Obviously this branch won't build at all until fixed
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote:
[...]
>Jose, I think now would be a good time for us to merge the trunk into a
>new Mach64 branch. Brian released Mesa 4.0.3 and the trunk looks like
>it's been updated, and we need to convert to drmCommand as well. Plus
>there are
Hi Alexander!
Wednesday 26, at 06:22:24 PM you wrote:
> > he using 20020625 snapshot
> >
> > from XFree86.0.log
> > ...
> > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] drmSetBusid failed (7, PCI:1:0:0),
> > Permission denied
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI.
> > ...
>
> Huh? Hi might
> he using 20020625 snapshot
>
> from XFree86.0.log
> ...
> (II) RADEON(0): [drm] drmSetBusid failed (7, PCI:1:0:0),
> Permission denied
> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI.
> ...
Huh? Hi might try as root. If it works then something
with per user file permissions or st
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:07:00AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > merge trunk into s3virge branch (probably won't build at all now).
> >
> > Needs fixing for drmCommand interface.
> >
>
> Er.. I was just about to suggest to do the merge in a new b
Hi Jos?!
Tuesday 25, at 09:48:20 AM you wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:36PM +0400, Konstantin Lepikhov wrote:
> >Hi Jos?!
> >
> >Monday 24, at 10:16:51 PM you wrote:
> >
> >>As some of you already noticed, fixed binaries - i.e, including libdri.a
> >>-, are now available on SF.
> >>
>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:00:18PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:07:00AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > merge trunk into s3virge branch (probably won't build at all now).
> >
> > Needs fixing for drmCommand interface.
> >
>
> Er.. I was just about to suggest to do the
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:54:23AM -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
>Module name: xc
>Repository:xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/
>Changes by:keithw@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/06/26 07:54:23
>
>Log message:
> Turn depth testing on, remove debug, turn tcl off by default.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:07:00AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> merge trunk into s3virge branch (probably won't build at all now).
>
> Needs fixing for drmCommand interface.
>
Er.. I was just about to suggest to do the merge in a new branch
(e.g., s3virge-0-0-2-branch) to avoid leave the s3
i would prefer this
DRI_DEBUG_DIR=/var/tmp/dri_debug_`date +%Y-%m-%d-%T`
so that on sorted dir listings the most recent is
always on top since this date is encoded "MSB first".
(textual month locales wont sort that good at all.)
another two things you might want to add:
/sbin/lspci -vvv >$DRI
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 13:07, Alexander Stohr wrote:
>> > A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs).
>>
>> Savage4 docs???
>> can you tell me whats up with them now?
>
>I got ProSavage docs and BCI tech ref from VIA/S3 under ND
>> Do you mean S3 Savage MX or is it a S3 virge MX???
>> Thanks,
>> JrSky.
S3 *** Virge *** MX. For Savage MX try utah. Or wait for us to code a
driver ; )
Vale,
- max
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM ev
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I'll do the merge now for you.
>
> Obviously this branch won't build at all until fixed up for the
> new drmCommand stuff.
I have been away a couple of months from active development. Where could
I gather more infos about drmCommand? Is it ea
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:45, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> Max, is there any file related to i830 missing or outdated in the
> s3virge branch? Or perhaps the i830 driver should be disabled on this
> branch.
There was a stale #if 0 in drm/kernel/drm.h. Fixed now. Could you please
let me know if this i
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:43:42PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:54, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I can do the trunk merge for you, if you want to fixup the code
> > later.
>
> Ok. It would be very nice from you. What I am supposed to do after:
> cvs update? So that co
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 13:07, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs).
>
> Savage4 docs???
> can you tell me whats up with them now?
I got ProSavage docs and BCI tech ref from VIA/S3 under NDA. I have a
very primitive Savage4 3D driver too (it paints just 3D tris - b
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:54, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I can do the trunk merge for you, if you want to fixup the code
> later.
Ok. It would be very nice from you. What I am supposed to do after:
cvs update? So that code on my HD will get in sync with CVS?
Thanks in advance,
vale,
- max
-
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:54, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Looks like the s3virge branch is lagging quite a bit behind the trunk.
Yep. The branch was created in late March.
> Max - you should bring in the current trunk code into your s3virge
> branch and fixup for the new drmCommand interface.
Ok. I
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 10:32, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
>>Module name: xc
>>Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/
>>Changes by: keithw@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/06/26 01:32:32
>>
>>Log message:
>> Fog correction
>>
>
> Out of curiosity, wh
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 10:32, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> Module name: xc
> Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/
> Changes by: keithw@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/06/26 01:32:32
>
> Log message:
> Fog correction
Out of curiosity, what was the problem?
--
Earthli
Looks like the s3virge branch is lagging quite a bit behind the trunk.
Max - you should bring in the current trunk code into your s3virge
branch and fixup for the new drmCommand interface.
Alan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:45:51AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> Last night the script tried to build
Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:48, John J. Tobin wrote:
>
>
>
>>Is the Virge MX+ supported? This is the one that was commonly found in
>>notebooks, as that is what I will be testing it out on.
>>
>>
>>
>Yep. That is the laptop on which I developed my driver on. so it
I can do the trunk merge for you, if you want to fixup the code
later.
Alan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:45:51AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> Last night the script tried to build the s3virge binary snapshot for the
> first time, but it failed when building a file related with the i830
> driver:
>
Last night the script tried to build the s3virge binary snapshot for the
first time, but it failed when building a file related with the i830
driver:
gcc -O2 -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -pipe -g -fno-merge-constan
Slava Polyakov wrote:
>
> Nope... dmesg shows all the same with both kernels:
>
> [drm] AGP 0.99 on Intel i815 @ 0xd800 64MB
> [drm] Initialized radeon 1.3.0 20020521 on minor 0
>
Can you extract the agpgart bits from /var/log/messages (the drm is a
different part) ?
It should look like
On June 26, 2002 02:29 am, Nicolas Aspert wrote:
> Slava Polyakov wrote:
> > 2.4.19-pre10:
> >
> > version: 0.99
> > bridge id: 0x11308086
> > agp_mode: 0x1f000207
> > aper_base: 0xd800
> > aper_size: 64
> > pg_total: 82176
> > pg_system: 82176
> > pg_used: 0
> > entry.key : 0
> > entry.key :
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00B7_44E11C5B.D0815A74"
61 matches
Mail list logo
