On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 00:10, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch
> > and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user
> > and I are both playing with the most).
> >
> > BSD branch's fault
> >
Eric Anholt wrote:
> Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch
> and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user
> and I are both playing with the most).
>
> BSD branch's fault
> - I haven't cleaned up the non-ostemplated _drv.c files in
> linu
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
>
> the QD is a 7200?
>
> I was ripped off! I was told it was a 7500!
back then when I bought my card there were no such things as 7x00
enumerations I think that is must be 7200 ... :) Keith can confirm
or deny that ... as he has
I did some more testing tonight, and I can't find anything that
concerns me. I say go for it :-)
Adam
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the problems with the M6 chip aren't the fault of the
> bsd-3-0-0-branch changes, but rather with the 2d & 3d drivers thems
Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch
and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user
and I are both playing with the most).
BSD branch's fault
- I haven't cleaned up the non-ostemplated _drv.c files in
linux, which means they will have a m
I'm pretty sure the problems with the M6 chip aren't the fault of the
bsd-3-0-0-branch changes, but rather with the 2d & 3d drivers themselves.
Are there any other reasons why the bsd-3-0-0 branch shouldn't merge to the trunk?
Keith
---
Thi
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:06, Tim Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 11:57 pm, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> > On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 23:40, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > On Monday 01 Jul 2002 10:10 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> > >
> > > > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2002
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 19:05, max wrote:
> Ok. I fixed DMA initialization stuff + did some cleanup in textures.
> It should run out of the box, now ; )
>
> The driver is quite complete: drmCommand, DMA, multiple opengl apps at the
> same time, etc.
Have you tested with UT (436) _and_ quake3 (1
Kareem Dana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an ASUS P4S533 motherboard with the sis645dx chipset. I need agpgart support
>for dri to work correctly, so in my kernel I enabled agpgart support (made the /dev
>entry) and enabled Generic SiS Chipset support under it.
>
> When my kernel boots up it comp
Hello,
I have an ASUS P4S533 motherboard with the sis645dx chipset. I need agpgart support
for dri to work correctly, so in my kernel I enabled agpgart support (made the /dev
entry) and enabled Generic SiS Chipset support under it.
When my kernel boots up it complains "Unsupported SiS chipset
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:20:27 -0400 (EDT), tu as dit :
> Hey guys,
> Quick question for everyone. Last time I tried to use both the
> DVI and CRT output on my Radeon 7500 at the same time (without xinerama
> running), I got a message in my X log file saying that DRI was disabled
> becaus
Hey guys,
Quick question for everyone. Last time I tried to use both the
DVI and CRT output on my Radeon 7500 at the same time (without xinerama
running), I got a message in my X log file saying that DRI was disabled
because it's unsupported when using both heads.
Is this still
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 17:48, Tim Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 12:27 am, Vedran Rodic scribed numinously:"
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
> >
> > Thanks Tim
> >
> > Works fine here
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 18:38, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Chris Howells wrote:
>>
>>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Is there any real need these days for DRI to be limited to only working on one
>>>X session?
>>>
>>>I spoke to the maintain
ff -ru to trunk, along with
> making World and testing radeon DRM.
>
> I've laid down a tag in trunk (trunk-20020703), which wasn't done before
> and isn't listed in the cvs instructions on the webpage. Not having a
> nice trunk tag might have been part of the issue f
k to bsd-3-0-0-branch.
I've tried to do this as correctly as I could, but I don't get along too
well with CVS. I've tried to be as correct as possible with it,
including looking at the cvs diff and the diff -ru to trunk, along with
making World and testing radeon DRM.
I've laid do
On Wednesday 03 Jul 2002 5:03 am, David Willmore scribed numinously:"
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:48:29PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > Great. So we're OK on
> > >
> > > Radeon 7500
> > > Radeon 7200
> > >
> > > anyone got a Radeon 7000 or old Radeon no-number to try it on?
> >
> > 7200 is the
On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 11:57 pm, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 23:40, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 01 Jul 2002 10:10 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> >
> > > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 21:28, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > >>- BEGIN_RIN
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 01:04, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Log message:
> > Make _dri.so link with libX11, which fixes some libGL using programs
> > (wine) on FreeBSD.
>
> Eric,
>
> Does the driver.so file actually have a dependency on libX11, or is this just
> a crutch for
19 matches
Mail list logo
