=
dri-devel, we don't want to waste your time...or ours
=
=
You must be determined to earn a bare minimum of $10,000 in the next 45-90 =
days
=
and to develop a net worth of over 1 Million Dollars Cash in the next 24-36 =
months.
=
My mission is to help other people develop their life long
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 18:52, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> > xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option).
[...]
> One observation wh
On Sam, 2002-10-12 at 00:07, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> - Forwarded message from Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:11:50 +0100
> From: Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock
> To: José Fons
On 2002.10.11 21:31 José Fonseca wrote:
Sorry for the delay, but it has been a busy day today.
The libxaa.a module build from today's CVS using
gcc-2.95.3/glibc-2.2.5 is available at
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/libxaa.a.bz2
This expands to some fat 6MB due to the debug info
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:00:18PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> >On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> >Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> >>xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -ligh
- Forwarded message from Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:11:50 +0100
From: Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock
To: José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:31:53 +0100
Jos
Sorry for the delay, but it has been a busy day today.
The libxaa.a module build from today's CVS using gcc-2.95.3/glibc-2.2.5 is
available at
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/libxaa.a.bz2
This expands to some fat 6MB due to the debug info, but first try it as
is before attempt
Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 19:07 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:00:18 +0100
>
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Felix Kühling wrote:
> > > On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> > >
> > > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>I was looking into the lighting issue
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 19:21, Ian Molton wrote:
>
> I still cant use the daily snapshots - I get Sig11's and no display.
>
> Are the snapshots still not glibc2.2 compatible?
That never mattered for the server. It would be interesting to know what
compiler version your XFree86 was built with, and
Hi.
I still cant use the daily snapshots - I get Sig11's and no display.
Are the snapshots still not glibc2.2 compatible?
I have X 4.2.1 and the latest snapshot. do I need anything else?
(radeon 7500, btw)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:00:18 +0100
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> >>xscreensaver pulsar hack (when runnin
Felix Kühling wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
>>xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
>>side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, s
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 18:52, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> > xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
> > side of the planes
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 19:00, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> >>xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
> xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
> side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, so I thought it
> might be r
Leif Delgass wrote:
> A couple of additions I forgot:
>
> 2D XFree86 Driver: ati_drv.o + atimisc_drv.o
>
> - Fog is disabled if alpha blending is enabled.
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
>
>
>>I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
>>
>>Card names:
>>3D Rage Pro
>>All-in-
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> OK, the IRQ stuff seems working currectly on my dual Athlon SMP box.
I can second that, q3a works fast and stable for me, too, now!
The 50-FPS-limit I used to experience is gone, and overall performance
is a lot better, too
demo four now gives me about 48 FPS (1280x1024@2
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, so I thought it
might be related to two-sided primitives.
Indeed, the hardware TCL code has a fallback for
Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>
>> Brian Paul wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've created a new DRI branch: mesa-4-1-branch
>>>
>>> I'm in the process of porting all the DRI drivers to the new Mesa 4.1
>>> code.
>>> I'll be checking in changes soon, but don't expect anything to run or
>>> even
>>> c
A couple of additions I forgot:
2D XFree86 Driver: ati_drv.o + atimisc_drv.o
- Fog is disabled if alpha blending is enabled.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
> I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
>
> Card names:
> 3D Rage Pro
> All-in-Wonder Pro
> Xpert 98/LCD/XL/@Play/@Wor
I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
Card names:
3D Rage Pro
All-in-Wonder Pro
Xpert 98/LCD/XL/@Play/@Work
3D Rage LT Pro
3D Rage XL
3D Rage Mobility
- No hardware stencil
- No mipmapping
- BLEND texture env is a software fallback
- texture environments which modulate alpha (AtAf) are
Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 10:32 schrieb Christopher L. Estep:
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Nützel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:53 PM
[-]
> > Here's the triumphant log attached as proof:
>
> [-]
>
> > (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
> > (
Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
New columns for gamma, ffb, mach64, virge, sis and trident.
Great work! Looks really impressive (and makes me feel really proud that
my chip is not the worst one:). A couple of easy questions:
is it true that Mach64 feature list is final (sure I do not mean
fallback).
Michel Dänzer wrote:
You have tried XFree86 CVS as in http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ ?
That I have NOT tried - I assumed that at that level DRI and XFree would
be the same (in other words, that the primary difference would be the 3D
subsystem).
But I could try it, then diff the two if the pro
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 04:27, David D. Hagood wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > BTW I think this bug is fixed in XFree86 CVS.
>
> No, it is not. I've called this one out a few times, but it still
> persists. I cannot beleive I am the only one with a Radeon 7500 DW and a
> good monitor.
You h
Title: Dear Friend
Dear Friend,
We would like to introduce ourselves
"Creativeskulls", We are a new media concern having a setup of 11 high end
workstations. We are looking for business partners/clients who are interested in
offloading their work. Our rate is only 5 US$ for an hour of
> New columns for gamma, ffb, mach64, virge, sis and trident.
Great work! Looks really impressive (and makes me feel really proud that
my chip is not the worst one:). A couple of easy questions:
is it true that Mach64 feature list is final (sure I do not mean
fallback). Also, 3 features are marked
> I've tested the radeon, r200 and tdfx drivers and they seem OK.
>
> I can't test the i810, i830, r128, mga, etc drivers (either because I don't
> have the right hardware or mine's broke). Some of the other drivers (like
> sis, ffb, etc) aren't enabled in the build process and haven't been por
Adam Duck wrote:
>>"Joe" == Joe Mackay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Joe> On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Frank Van Damme wrote:
>
> >> www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m9917684/r200-20020920-linux.i386.tar.bz2 should
> >> work.
>
> Joe> Brilliant... thanks, you're a star!
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
