[Dri-devel] SiS news

2003-06-25 Thread Alex Deucher
I just saw this on extremetech today: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1101038,00.asp Looks like SiS is spinning off it's graphics chip division. perhaps this could mean better access to databooks! time will tell I suppose. Alex __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_NV_texture_rectangle on radeon

2003-06-25 Thread Ian Romanick
Keith Whitwell wrote: Here's a patch that mainly works. I've still seen the odd case of the texture apparently getting uploaded to the backbuffer. ...but *only* if you have a kernel module installed that understands rectangle state. As it is, the code in radeon_state_init.c allows texture rect

[Dri-devel] DRI X server hang.

2003-06-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Only "normal" DRI and Mesa CVS access as developer, now? > To: "lists.sourceforge.net dri-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: Michel "Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon drm in 2.5.73

2003-06-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:53:43PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote: > I have a problem with the radeon drm in kernel 2.5.73. When modprobing the > module, it comes back with "radeon: Unknown symbol flush_tlb_all" and won't > load. This has been happening for at least 5 kernel versions I believe. Is

Re: [Dri-devel] status of ATI IGP 320M?

2003-06-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:31:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This question id aimed primary to Dave Jones, as I found an > interesting message from him in this mail-list, but can be also > interesting to all Radeon IGP victims. > > Where can I check the status of your driver? http

Re: [Dri-devel] Only "normal" DRI and Mesa CVS access as developer, now?

2003-06-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > >>On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote: > > > >>>On Mon, Jun

Re: [Dri-devel] Configuration per application

2003-06-25 Thread Philip Brown
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:01:47PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have some questions about OS specific ways to find out the name of a > > running programme outside function main. > > extern chat *__progname; > > works on OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux. it defi

Re: [Dri-devel] Reverse engineering Windows Radeon IGP320/340 driver?

2003-06-25 Thread Alex Deucher
once the agpgart stuff is in place I don't imagine it'll be that hard to add DRI support to the radeon/r200 driver. I think the IGP chips are pretty similar to their counterparts with dedicated memory. if the 9100IGP is anything like a 9200 it should work with the r200 driver with a little work o

Re: [Dri-devel] Reverse engineering Windows Radeon IGP320/340 driver?

2003-06-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:05:11PM +0200, Andreas Stenglein wrote: > Am 2003.06.10 12:18:23 +0200 schrieb(en) Dave Jones: > > I have the specs for this monster, but it's a bit funky. > Do you have "full enough" specs to can say that it should work > with the radeon driver if agpgart is availabl

Re: [Dri-devel] Reverse engineering Windows Radeon IGP320/340 driver?

2003-06-25 Thread Andreas Stenglein
Am 2003.06.10 12:18:23 +0200 schrieb(en) Dave Jones: > I have the specs for this monster, but it's a bit funky. Do you have "full enough" specs to can say that it should work with the radeon driver if agpgart is available, or to can say what needs to be done on the radeon driver? Do you have spec

Re: [Dri-devel] Only "normal" DRI and Mesa CVS access as developer, now?

2003-06-25 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 22:31 schrieb Martin Spott: > Jos? Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a new > > machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like? > > As far as I know BerliOS is hosting quite a few Open

Re: [Dri-devel] Last part of GLX_SGI_make_current_read support

2003-06-25 Thread Ian Romanick
Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read. I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in libGL.so and in at least one driver, is in place.

[Dri-devel] [PATCH] export flush_tlb_all for drm modules

2003-06-25 Thread Jan Dittmer
This adds an export for flush_tlb_all to i386_ksyms.c. The drm modules miss this, when compiling for SMP. Original fix from Pasi Savolainen, but for some reason this was not included until now (2.5.73-mm1). His comment: > drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h needs this to compile as module (at > least)o

Re: [Dri-devel] Configuration per application

2003-06-25 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:32:22 +0200 Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > 2) (How) can one check for specific *BSD versions via #if ? I found some more info on http://predef.sourceforge.net/preos.html, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.h

Re: [Dri-devel] Configuration per application

2003-06-25 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:01:47 +1000 Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have some questions about OS specific ways to find out the name of a > > running programme outside function main. > > extern chat *__progname; > > works on OpenBSD, NetBSD and L

[Dri-devel] Your buglist for The XFree86 Project's Bugzilla needs attention.

2003-06-25 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at th