Okay the last few fixes make tuxracer and glxgears work again, so the new
branch should be as useable as the old one, I think there are still a few
cleanups in the native vertex code (using macros for a few things), and
then a texmem converison might be in order.
But it's good enough for me t
I've been getting a lot of mail about this both on and off list. First off, very
little code has been written, this is just a design concept.
One thing is clear there are two consoles involved. One is the system console
that receives printk's, the second is your garden variety command line termin
Ian Romanick wrote:
1. Commit some minor changes to the r200 driver to use the new
interfaces. This will go in Mesa trunk, but will be guarded by #ifdef.
This is needed because the code calls some functions in dri_util.c that
only exist in the branch.
Done. Tomorrow I may do some clean-up on
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 13:50, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:51:58 +
> Sérgio Monteiro Basto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 22:38, Sérgio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:27, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I realize that xc/extra
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 00:26, Hod McWuff wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 17:28, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
>
> By the way, where can I find a three-way merge tool? ;)
I like meld, for example.
> I've found Gatos-related changes in radeon_cp.c, radeon_drv.h, and
> radeon_state.c. I've reimplemented what
On Maw, 2004-02-10 at 00:30, Jon Smirl wrote:
> There are lots of solutions to this:
> 1) queue the printk's
Not a solution. The box crashed, game over, where is my data
> 2) add an in-kernel path for write to console that cooperates with the normal
> user space one
Ditto
> 3) if you know you a
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 23:48 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 14:19 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
> > Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 08:45 schrieb Email Archive:
> > >> On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 20:55, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >>> [ Following up to t
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 08:20, Hod McWuff wrote:
>
> That's not what I meant - I mean, what big things have happened in the
> *DRI* tree since the Gatos fork. I need an idea of that to be able to
> sort gatos-related changes from simple base-version differences.
Once you have found the common ances
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 21:26, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I was looking through the the databooks regarding PCI gart and I
> > noticed that r128, radeon, and r200 all do PCI gart the same way.
> that
> > said, I also noticed that PCI GART is limited to 4
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 21:26, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I was looking through the the databooks regarding PCI gart and I
> noticed that r128, radeon, and r200 all do PCI gart the same way. that
> said, I also noticed that PCI GART is limited to 4 MB of system memory
> when used with a PCI card and 32 M
I was looking through the the databooks regarding PCI gart and I
noticed that r128, radeon, and r200 all do PCI gart the same way. that
said, I also noticed that PCI GART is limited to 4 MB of system memory
when used with a PCI card and 32 MB when used with an AGP card. I
haven't yet looked at th
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are two mainpieces to this that I know of, maybe more.
>
> 1) The tuner
> 2) video overlays
>
> xserver may render video overlays pointless. Once we get hardware
> compositing
> going you should be able to rebuild the entire screen on every TV
> f
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:51:58 +
Sérgio Monteiro Basto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 22:38, Sérgio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:27, Felix Kühling wrote:
> >
> > > > I realize that xc/extras/Mesa is almost the same source of Mesa-5.0.2
> > > > with just
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 17:44, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Did GATOS make changes to the DRM drivers?
>
Yes, for a while I was tracking its CVS and rebuilding often. I had
3D and video working together just fine under 2.4. Gentoo Linux even
went as far as making a drm-kernel ebuild that patched for gatos.
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 01:41, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Hod McWuff wrote:
>
> >So, to summarize, I need to know *roughly* what's changed since the
> >Gatos folks forked, in terms of what-moved-where and an idea of any
> >structural changes. I can read the different sources and fi
16 matches
Mail list logo
