-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Per the discussion in the other vblank thread, this patch does several
> things:
> - adds a new getMSC hook to __DRIdrawableRec
> - updates glXGetVideoSyncSGI to use the new hook if present
> - adds new vblank fields to __DR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> It seems that drivers that set their MSC routines to NULL will return
>> GL_BAD_CONTEXT from calls like glXWaitVideoSyncSGI(), and if e.g.
>> drmWaitVBlank() failed clie
At XDS and on IRC we've been discussing how to deal with backward
compatibility (i.e. old Mesa & X on new DRM) once we have things like
full TTM and modesetting support in the kernel.
The preferred option at this point seems to be to add a new kernel
config option, e.g. CONFIG_DRM_MODESETTING o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6790
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Per the discussion in the other vblank thread, this patch does several
things:
- adds a new getMSC hook to __DRIdrawableRec
- updates glXGetVideoSyncSGI to use the new hook if present
- adds new vblank fields to __DRIdrawablePrivateRec
- adds a new driDrawableGetMSC32 vblank.c routine
t
On 9/26/07, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:31 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 8:11:19 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 07:53 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:08:13 am Mich
On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:39 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Err yeah I was describing it backwards. The __DRIscreen hooks for
> > the MSC stuff all point to dri_util.c wrapper functions that end up
> > calling the driver hooks. However, drivers always set their hooks
> > to either NULL or t
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:38 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> libGL error: drmMap of framebuffer failed (Invalid argument)
the bug is pretty clear "Invalid argument"
where this is fixed ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:31 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 8:11:19 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 07:53 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:08:13 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Je
On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 8:11:19 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 07:53 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:08:13 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > that moves the new fields over to the
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 07:53 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:08:13 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >
> > > that moves the new fields over to the drawable private. I added a new
> > > drawable hook to implement
On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:08:13 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Monday, September 24, 2007 1:25 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 12:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Friday, September 21, 2007 2:51 am Michel
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:51 PST ---
I think a change that I made to how _TriangleCaps is computed (last December)
is the root cause here. I didn't realize _TriangleCaps was sometimes used
before state valid
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> linux-core/drm_drv.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> New commits:
> diff-tree 6671ad1917698b6174a1af314b63b3800d75248c (from
> 03c47f1420bf17a1e0f2b86be500656ae5a4c95b)
> Author: Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed Sep 26 15:38:
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 19:04 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 02:19 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > Hi I just update all gits: libdrm, drm, mesa and xf86-video-intel
> >
> > And now I don't have DRI
>
> No, you don't have AIGLX, which is a long ways from not having DRI.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #5 from [
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12132
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #6 from [
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 01:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I didn't see any difference between DRI and no-DRI mode, they all got the
> following
> result:
Sorry, I make a mistake. You are right.
--
C
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 21:51 -0400, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>
> I have made a program that draws zfail/zpass shadows. I draw three
> models with ~120 tris each and one light source and a simple floor, with
> zpass. I can get a full 60fps until the window size reaches about
> 780x580
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Monday, September 24, 2007 1:25 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 12:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 21, 2007 2:51 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > - add code to Mesa so GetMSC/WaitForMSC set
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
