On Friday 29 July 2005 23:16, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Btw if i understand correctly during POST of a card you ask the
video BIOS to initialize the card ? Does it do other things (i suppose
vga initialisation too...) googling give me a tons of wrong result...
Well, IIRC, the BIOS scans 'some'
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 22:15, Jerome Glisse wrote:
Btw can you try if vbetool vbestate save work on your computer
(do this from text console with no X running). It seems that launching
fglrx then do a repost of the card (with vbetool repost) then use
r300 and the lockup appear again (no
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 11:06, Jerome Glisse wrote:
In fact, i use xfree86 (from debian testing) for fglrx,
You mean xfree86 4.3.0 + ati.patch from r300 cvs ?
No the original xfree86 from debian with fglrx, and i
have installed elsewhere Xorg with r300 (in fact
my rep /usr/X11R6 is link
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 08:44, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:10 +0200
You dont have two cards hooked up by any chance? :)
No, no handmade mobo with 2 agp slots :)
Does Xorg.0.log get the card right?
Apparently yes, it does.
You probably want to check if microcode_version
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 19:04, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:27 +0200
Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 08:44, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:10 +0200
You dont have two cards hooked up by any chance
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:13, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 7/27/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you have any scenario where you are sure X will hang ??
Launch ut2003 or 2004 (don't remember which one) demos then start a game
(quick launch) and it will lockup during level
On Monday 25 July 2005 21:53, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 7/25/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:22, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:59:53 +0200
[drm:drm_ioctl] pid=9733, cmd=0x40106450, nr=0x50, dev 0xe200, auth=1
[drm:radeon_cp_cmdbuf] RADEON_CMD_SCALARS2
[drm:radeon_cp_cmdbuf] *ERROR* bad cmd_type 0 at e08fa024
r300_do_cp_cmdbuf doesnt get
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
I see. Will try that this evening.
I am still looking at what fglrx does and
On Monday 25 July 2005 11:33, Jerome Glisse wrote:
If anyone have a better procedure to track differences btw radeon/r300 2d
driver from xorg and fglrx (2d driver) ?
I'm not used at all to work on x86 processors, nor am I with PCI or AGP, so
what follows may be complete nonsense...
Isn't it
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
A quick question: which version of X and fglrx are you using ?
I've been
On Monday 25 July 2005 00:47, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Bellido Nicolas wrote:
When the radeon module is loaded, i get in the kernel logs:
Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA KT880 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xe000
[drm] Initialized drm
12 matches
Mail list logo
