Hi,
I have a laptop with a Mobility Radeon 9700 in it, running xorg 1.5.2 +
linux 2.6.27. This seems to work pretty well, except that when I
sleep the laptop, it doesn't look like the video card refreshes onboard
memory. When I resume it, textures in eg. compiz are garbage.
Flipping back to a c
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 23:55 -0800, Elladan wrote:
> >
> > I have a laptop with a Mobility Radeon 9700 in it, running xorg 1.5.2 +
> > linux 2.6.27. This seems to work pretty well, except that when I
> > s
Where would this problem most likely reside in the code? Any guesses?
Eg., file/function areas? I can go playing around in there if someone
have some vague idea what the problem might be...
-J
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 08:15:26AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Elladan wrote:
> >Yes. I
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:18:44PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Elladan wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 08:15:26AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Elladan wrote:
> >>
> >>>Yes. I'm seeing the same thing on my Radeon 7500. See screenshots
&g
n-tcl driver and opaque by the tcl driver.
> If a similar mixup is happening in multipass rendering then it could
> account for the artifacts.
>
> Presumably there are some states where color should be rgba, but we're just
> sending the rgb components to hardware.
>
&
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 11:44:48PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> >if ( dev->fn_tbl.foo )
> >def->fn_tbl.foo();
> >
> > I'd rather have drivers init all the functions to some generic, noop function.
> > I think that makes the code a lot cleaner to read.
>
> I've thought about this
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-11-03 at 06:17, Elladan wrote:
> >
> > It might be best to provide both interfaces. It's probably not
> > significantly harder to provide both API's - they both trigger off the
> &g
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-11-03 at 23:46, Elladan wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Son, 2002-11-03 at 06:17, Elladan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It might
