Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-30 03:19 ---
(In reply to comm
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 15:03 ---
I have similar pr
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-28 21:16 ---
Sorry, I forgot t
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-14-08 10:14 ---
The problem this bug is about is unlikely to be specific to these screensavers.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are th
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-08 12:54 ---
I tried them a while back on my m6 and they seemed to work ok, although I didn't
really do extensive testing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?t
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-08 12:47 ---
To make it easier for others, the screensavers in question are available at
http://rss-glx.sourceforge.net/. It also doesn't seem to want to build w/gcc
2.96, but gcc 3.3 s
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-08 05:26 ---
Re: #16
> * With various values of the CCEusecTimeout (5000 -> 1000,000),
>
But 5000 is less than the default of 1 so I would expect lockups in this case.
> I get a r
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-08 04:30 ---
Note that the CPusecTimeout value does not have any significant effect
on the radeon driver. Well, it does make things "jerky". But it does
not effect or reduce the freque
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-08 19:15 ---
So you're saying it still locks up with a higher timeout for you?
Re #15, I hope John can give you instructions.
I'm afraid you can't do anything like this with Magic Sysr
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-08 12:57 ---
Re #9, I've now tried it. Here's what I found:
* With various values of the CCEusecTimeout (5000 -> 1000,000), I get a
reduction in frames-per sec of about 3 (Measuring wit
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-08 04:56 ---
> PS: We don't need to make the error messages unique because we know this must
> be in R128CCEWaitForIdle(). ;P
>
You are truely wise...I am not worthy :-)
> Also, I'm cur
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 07:38 ---
radeon and r128 are basically independent drivers. The corresponding radeon
driver option is called "CPusecTimeout".
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userpref
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 01:58 ---
Note that the "radeon" driver has all the problems listed here in this bug too.
It is NOT just the "r128" driver. Although it appears "radeon" is a sub-
module, needing "r1
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 12:05 ---
Actually, it's 32 (R128_IDLE_RETRY) times 10 or 20 milliseconds...
Also, I'm curious: does R128CCEWaitForIdle() deal more gracefully with the
timeout if you add a R128CCE_S
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 11:47 ---
This makes sense; the chip can apparently be busy for more than 10 milliseconds,
and a reset may actually make things worse. I don't think raising the default
timeout should
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 06:38 ---
Progress perhaps?! I modified my XF86Config file to include the CCEusecTimeout
option. By increasing this I have been able to run both colorfire and euphoria,
both at work a
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 17:37 schrieb Richard Neill:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 16:16 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >>http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-07
> >> 10:16 ---
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 16:16 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-07 10:16
> --- The "colorfire" screensaver also does the same thing - it runs for
> about 2 seconds, and then locks th
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-07 10:16 ---
The "colorfire" screensaver also does the same thing - it runs for about 2
seconds, and then locks the system hard. According to the documentation,
"This didn't ta
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
