On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:01:03AM -0700, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
>
> --- "R. Reucher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew James Richardson wrote:
> >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > >I thought that in the C specs you can't be
> > guarenteed the order of
> > > evaluation in an if brace. Surely
>
>I thought that in the C specs you can't be guarenteed the order of
> evaluation in an if brace. Surely a safer bet is
>
> if(!image){
> if(!image->Data){
> ...
> }
> }
>
> If you know better I stand corrected, I'm just think
> Brian,
>
>I thought that in the C specs you can't be guarenteed the order of
> evaluation in an if brace. Surely a safer bet is
>
> if(!image){
> if(!image->Data){
> ...
> }
> }
Order of operations is actually guaranteed in this case. See
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/C-faq/faq/ (item 3.5).
You
--- "R. Reucher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew James Richardson wrote:
>
> > Brian,
> >
> >I thought that in the C specs you can't be
> guarenteed the order of
> > evaluation in an if brace. Surely a safer bet is
> >
> > if(!image){
> > if(!image->Data){
> >
Andrew James Richardson wrote:
> Brian,
>
>I thought that in the C specs you can't be guarenteed the order of
> evaluation in an if brace. Surely a safer bet is
>
> if(!image){
> if(!image->Data){
> ...
> }
> }
You're r
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
> Pontus Hedman wrote:
> >
> > > Either submit the patch here if it's small enough, or submit
> > > to patches on the DRI sourceforge page.
> >
> > Ok; it's a trivial one-liner to r128ConvertTexture32bpp.
> > See below.
> >
> > It's probably more of a work
Pontus Hedman wrote:
>
> > Either submit the patch here if it's small enough, or submit
> > to patches on the DRI sourceforge page.
>
> Ok; it's a trivial one-liner to r128ConvertTexture32bpp.
> See below.
>
> It's probably more of a workaround than a fix
> (the image passed in from r128UploadS
> Either submit the patch here if it's small enough, or submit
> to patches on the DRI sourceforge page.
Ok; it's a trivial one-liner to r128ConvertTexture32bpp.
See below.
It's probably more of a workaround than a fix
(the image passed in from r128UploadSubImage()
had dimensions but no Data for
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Pontus Hedman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a bugfix that I don't know what to do with.
>
> I built X11R6-DRI on tuesday from CVS via
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri
> because my Descent3 that I bought last week
> was locking up up XFree86 4.0.3 incessantly.
> As in, within
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:17:01AM -0400, Pontus Hedman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a bugfix that I don't know what to do with.
>
> I built X11R6-DRI on tuesday from CVS via
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri
> because my Descent3 that I bought last week
> was locking up up XFree86 4.0.3 incess
Hello all,
I have a bugfix that I don't know what to do with.
I built X11R6-DRI on tuesday from CVS via
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri
because my Descent3 that I bought last week
was locking up up XFree86 4.0.3 incessantly.
As in, within a minute or two of play. Gah!
I came up with a fix to xc
11 matches
Mail list logo
