On 19 Feb 2002 19:02:47 + Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JF> The man page indeed mentions that, but how do you explain what is
JF> happening!? I was really suggesting to put /usr/lib before
JF> /usr/X11R6/lib because the libGL we are interest in is already symlink'd
JF> in /usr/lib..
On 2002.02.19 19:35 Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:02:47PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Michael, please try to copy the glxinfo & glxgears binaries to other
> > place and run them from there.
>
> Jose, I copied glxinfo and glxgears from /usr/X11R6 to /root and tried it
>
Michael wrote:
> I don't see your problem? I'm using debian unstable. Adding
> /usr/foo/bar/ to /etc/ld.so.conf and running /sbin/ldconfig works just
> fine (as Jose described)
>
> see man 8 ld.so, it searches LD_LIBRARY_PATH, /etc/ld.so.cache then
> /usr/lib and /lib.
You're right. It was a re
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:05:54AM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote:
> Symlinking to the "correct" libGL (in /usr/X11R6-DRI) is almost the
> same as copying it to /usr/lib, it still interferes with the
> distro's packaging system and might not survive the next upgrade (on
> Debian unstable, that mean
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:28:54PM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote:
> > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > > No, there's no need. You probably just have to change the order on which
> > > /usr/lib/ and /usr/X11R6/lib/ directories appear on /etc/ld.so.conf and
> > > run '/sbin/ldconfig
Hi Dieter,
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> OK, Allen Akin told you what the LSB standard is:
> libGL* belongs into /usr/lib.
>
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 25 Feb 17 01:50 libGL.so.1 ->
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1
> X11R6/lib> l libGL* libglut*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12
Malte Cornils wrote:
> Leif Delgass wrote:
> > I thought this was done by "make install", I have:
> >
> > % ls -l /usr/lib/libGL*
> > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 27 Feb 18 19:34 /usr/lib/libGL.so
> > -> /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/libGL.so
> > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 29 Feb 18
Leif Delgass wrote:
> I thought this was done by "make install", I have:
>
> % ls -l /usr/lib/libGL*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 27 Feb 18 19:34 /usr/lib/libGL.so
> -> /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/libGL.so
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 29 Feb 18 19:34
> /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> /u
Ian Romanick wrote:
>>Any hints how to do it in a better way?
> How about the obvious? Don't put libGL (and friends) in /usr/lib. Always
> put them in /usr/X11*/lib. If you have some other libGL (standalone Mesa,
> perhaps), but it in /usr/local/lib.
Yes, I might do that if it wouldn't greatly
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:02:47PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Michael, please try to copy the glxinfo & glxgears binaries to other
> place and run them from there.
Jose, I copied glxinfo and glxgears from /usr/X11R6 to /root and tried it
with /root/glxinfo and /root/glxgears and it still uses
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:05:08AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
|
| How about the obvious? Don't put libGL (and friends) in /usr/lib.
The Linux OpenGL ABI standard requires that libGL and libGLU be in
/usr/lib. Obviously a lot of applications will work even if that's not
true, but some apps, Mak
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Malte Cornils wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >>mthaler:~# ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo
> >>libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4009c000)
> >>where quake3 probably uses the libGL from /usr/lib/
> >>lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 31 19. Feb 12:11 /usr/lib
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:28:54PM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> > No, there's no need. You probably just have to change the order on which
> > /usr/lib/ and /usr/X11R6/lib/ directories appear on /etc/ld.so.conf and
> > run '/sbin/ldconfig'
>
> Unfortunately, /usr/lib is
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:35:45PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Most of my problems were solved when disabling the framebuffer:
How can you do that?
Greetings,
Michael
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/list
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 18:28, Malte Cornils wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >>mthaler:~# ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo
> >>libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4009c000)
> >>where quake3 probably uses the libGL from /usr/lib/
> >>lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 31 19. Feb 12:11 /
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>mthaler:~# ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo
>>libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4009c000)
>>where quake3 probably uses the libGL from /usr/lib/
>>lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 31 19. Feb 12:11 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 ->
>/usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/libGL.so.1.2
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 16:40, Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:13:39PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > The only explanation I see is that glxinfo is not picking up the correct
> > libGL.so. Since this issue can came back to haunt you later, please do
> > 'ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/gl
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:13:39PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> The only explanation I see is that glxinfo is not picking up the correct
> libGL.so. Since this issue can came back to haunt you later, please do
> 'ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo' and also 'ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxgears' (paths
> may v
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 15:35, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Most of my problems were solved when disabling the framebuffer:
The framebuffer is the memory on the video card, so what exactly have
you disabled? :)
> [...]
> (WW) ATI(0): Cannot shadow an accelerated frame buffer.
> [...]
Isn't this a perfec
>
>
>mthaler:~# glxinfo
>name of display: :0.0
>display: :0 screen: 0
>direct rendering: No
>server glx vendor string: SGI
>server glx version string: 1.2
>server glx extensions:
>
Try running glxinfo with LIBGL debugging enabled (LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose
glxinfo), that might help to trace the proble
José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On 2002.02.19 14:36 Michael Thaler wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:10:19PM +0100, R. Reucher wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > (II) ATI(0): Direct rendering enabled
> >
> > It definitely says direct rendering is enabled!
> >
>
> Yes. That's is definitely true.
>
> > ...
> >
>
On 2002.02.19 14:36 Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:10:19PM +0100, R. Reucher wrote:
>
> ...
> (II) ATI(0): Direct rendering enabled
>
> It definitely says direct rendering is enabled!
>
Yes. That's is definitely true.
> ...
>
> I still get:
>
> mthaler:~# glxinfo
> name
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 15:36, Michael Thaler wrote:
> (II) ATI(0): Direct rendering enabled
>
> It definitely says direct rendering is enabled!
Ok, then it's working correctly ! Sorry for any confusion caused by me :-)...
> > Hmmm, this might just be caused by the less color bits you're usin
Hello,
Most of my problems were solved when disabling the framebuffer:
[...]
(WW) ATI(0): Cannot shadow an accelerated frame buffer.
[...]
This helps both on GATOS (2d) and DRI (3d). I have an ATI RAGE XL
(onboard tyan S2462) with 4MB, so things may work different on your sys.
I hope this helps
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:10:19PM +0100, R. Reucher wrote:
> Then it's still not working correctly ! Please look at your XFree86.0.log
> again and search for "direct rendering" !!!
(II) ATI(0): [drm] created "mach64" driver at busid "PCI:1:0:0"
(II) ATI(0): [drm] added 4096 byte SAREA at 0xc88
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 14:48, Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:00:54PM +0100, R. Reucher wrote:
>
> Thank you very much! Now I get:
>
> mthaler:~# lsmod
> Module Size Used byNot tainted
> mach64 71544 1
>
> but glxinfo still shows:
>
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:00:54PM +0100, R. Reucher wrote:
Thank you very much! Now I get:
mthaler:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
mach64 71544 1
but glxinfo still shows:
mthaler:~# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct re
I don't have a Mach64 chipset but looked at the attached files...
You seem to get out of video memory, starting X at a lower depth might help
(16bpp, that is) !
>From your X log:
...
(WW) ATI(0): DRI static buffer allocation failed -- need at least 9216 kB
video memory
(II) ATI(0): Using XFre
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:44:43AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> Please check:
> - if /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 is pointing to /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/libGL.so.
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 10 19. Feb 12:17 /usr/lib/libGL.so ->
libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 19. Feb 12:17
On 2002.02.19 10:14 Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I compiled the mac64 driver following Leifs excellent mini-HOWTO. I
> did not find any errors after compiling in world.log. I installed
> XFree86 to /usr/X11R6-DRI, inserted mach64.o with insmod (I have
> agpgart compiled into the kernel) and st
Hi,
I compiled the mac64 driver following Leifs excellent mini-HOWTO. I
did not find any errors after compiling in world.log. I installed
XFree86 to /usr/X11R6-DRI, inserted mach64.o with insmod (I have
agpgart compiled into the kernel) and started X with
/usr/X11R6-DRI/bin/X which worked fine. I
31 matches
Mail list logo
