On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-15] José Fonseca wrote:
>
> Half done. For everybody eager to get the latest DRI trunk do something
> like:
>
> rsync -avz --delete rsync://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/dri/ HEAD/
Thanks. CVS was getting to be useless.
Linus
--
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:06:05PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> I'm going to follow Alan suggestion and setup a rsync mirror of the CVS
> trunk checkout on my machine at the Uni. I just don't know wether I'll
> do the update from a cronjob (if so how frequent?), or if trigered by
> the commits (e.g
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 11:04:47PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > This is a reasonable proposition -- let's start putting a draft together,
> > then.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > SF admins,
> >
> > We're concerned about the recent c
Mesa3d seems to be affected, too.
No mesa CVS update for 10 days, now ;-(
My DRI CVS is 12 days old...
No chance from "old Europe" anymore?
Greetings,
Dieter
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
But we really need to get a solution around the backup CVS server as it
really damages the beneficial intervention of non-commiters can have
since they are days behind wha
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > But we really need to get a solution around the backup CVS server as it
> > really damages the beneficial intervention of non-commiters can have
> > since they are days behind what the comm
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 20:24 schrieb José Fonseca:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
> > It's hindering open source so much.
> >
> > Do we have other options?
>
> I've never tried but isn't possible for no
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > >Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > >>On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
> > > >>>On Mon, Jun
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 22:31 schrieb Martin Spott:
> Jos? Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a new
> > machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
>
> As far as I know BerliOS is hosting quite a few Open
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:33PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > I wonder if it's really such a pressing problem though.
>
> Imagine you're working with somebody testing some code, but that person
> has no CVS write access. After y
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I mentioned XFree86.org because (supposedly) it has the bandwith and
> > machine resources to host the DRI repository, and obviously XFree86 and
> > DRI are two very close entities.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying. It
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then the solution would imp
what about https://savannah.nongnu.org/
Alex
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jos? Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a
> new
> > machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
>
> As far a
Jos? Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a new
> machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
As far as I know BerliOS is hosting quite a few OpenSource projects. This is
intended to be some SF alternative.
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 20:24 schrieb José Fonseca:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
> > It's hindering open source so much.
> >
> > Do we have other options?
>
> I've never tried but isn't possible for no
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
> It's hindering open source so much.
>
> Do we have other options?
I've never tried but isn't possible for non-developers also access the
SF CVS repository via SSH (read-only
These sourceforge "backup" server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
Regards,
Dieter
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INet
19 matches
Mail list logo
