Re: [Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 23:27 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > On Die, 2002-12-03 at 21:16, Felix Kühling wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:15:29 +0100 > > > > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 19:12 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > > > could I remind you of the or

Re: [Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2002-12-03 at 21:16, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:15:29 +0100 > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 19:12 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > > > > > could I remind you of the original subject of this thread? ;-) It sounds > > > like the disc

Re: [Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:44:28 -0700 Nicholas Leippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a quick question--what game are those screen shots from? torcs.sourceforge.net Cheers, Felix __\|/_____ ___ ___ __Tschüß___\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,_

Re: [Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Felix Kühling
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:15:29 +0100 Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 19:12 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > Hi all, > > > > could I remind you of the original subject of this thread? ;-) It sounds > > like the discussions about a new configuration tool could go on f

Re: [Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 19:12 schrieb Felix Kühling: > Hi all, > > could I remind you of the original subject of this thread? ;-) It sounds > like the discussions about a new configuration tool could go on for a > while and I am sure going to contribute to that if I can. In the mean > time, c

[Dri-devel] Please, smoother graphics with 16bpp on radeon

2002-12-03 Thread Felix Kühling
Hi all, could I remind you of the original subject of this thread? ;-) It sounds like the discussions about a new configuration tool could go on for a while and I am sure going to contribute to that if I can. In the mean time, could we just change to 32bpt. In that case my original patch would do