Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 21:49, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
One more thing that may influence the performance is your screen
resolution and refresh rate as the refresh consumes memory bandwidth.
It's just plain 72 Hz, nothing special.
IIRC there used to
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 21:49, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > > One more thing that may influence the performance is your screen
> > > resolution and refresh rate as the refresh consumes memory bandwidth.
> >
> > It's just plain 72 Hz, nothing special.
>
> IIRC there use
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:49:48 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In gmane.comp.video.dri.devel, you wrote:
> >> Is my RV200 QW a regular Radeon 7500 or some lame el cheapo model?
> >> What's the expected glxgears rate for my kind of setup?
> >
> > For comparison, I have a cheap
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 21:49, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > One more thing that may influence the performance is your screen
> > resolution and refresh rate as the refresh consumes memory bandwidth.
>
> It's just plain 72 Hz, nothing special.
IIRC there used to be an inexplicable performance d
In gmane.comp.video.dri.devel, you wrote:
>> Is my RV200 QW a regular Radeon 7500 or some lame el cheapo model?
>> What's the expected glxgears rate for my kind of setup?
>
> For comparison, I have a cheap clone radeon card
> also with RV200 QW chip, 64MB SDR Ram and passive cooling (as an
> indic
