Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:59, Adam Duck wrote: > > "Andy" == Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andy> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for > Andy> linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm > Andy> not even

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-04 Thread Adam Duck
> "Andy" == Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andy> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for Andy> linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm Andy> not even sure that they work on that platform. Broken snapshots

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-03 Thread Jens Owen
José Fonseca wrote: > Anyway, I already have the minimum chroot environment setup. I just need > to test it with a few snapshots, and arrange so that everything can be > automated from a cronjob again. Your awesome! Thanks for your effort on these snapshots. --

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-03 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:06:38PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: >Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 19:29 schrieb José Fonseca: >> On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: [...] >> >The RedHat 8.0/glibc-2.3 "problem" is simple. Stay away from it before >> >glibc-2.3 is in wide sprea

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-03 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 19:29 schrieb José Fonseca: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 18:35 schrieb Andy Dustman: > > [...] > > >> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for > >> linux-i386) don't wor

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Ian Molton
On 02 Oct 2002 12:35:19 -0400 Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots > (for linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or > glibc-2.3; Really? is that why my machine dies when using the current snaps? I have gl

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: >Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 18:35 schrieb Andy Dustman: [...] >> >> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for >> linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm >> not even sure

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 12:50, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Sorry, but read again. > I didn't deny the snapshots per se. > Only your call for something like dripkg.sh. > The RedHat 8.0/glibc-2.3 "problem" is simple. Stay away from it before > glibc-2.3 is in wide spread. Installing a "brand" new distro

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 18:35 schrieb Andy Dustman: > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 12:19, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > Perhaps we need to produce binary snapshots for each driver that > > > includes only the device-specific stuff (kinda like what dripkg.sh does > > > now) and then have a separate snap

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 12:19, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Perhaps we need to produce binary snapshots for each driver that > > includes only the device-specific stuff (kinda like what dripkg.sh does > > now) and then have a separate snapshot for the libraries (particularly > > the GL libraries) which

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 18:03 schrieb Andy Dustman: > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:57, José Fonseca wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: [-] > > >Can anyone put together a list of what libraries must be upgraded? The > > >GL directory in the dripkg is empty in

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:57, José Fonseca wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: > >What didn't work was making a binary snapshot (via the dripkg.sh script) > >and installing that over the system-wide X installation: It does the the > >same old trick of the video go

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: >I finally last night got the CVS version to run, but only by running the >complete X server out of the build tree. glxgears runs several hundred >fps (I forget the exact number) but even better, used virtually no CPU >time, so apparent

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
I finally last night got the CVS version to run, but only by running the complete X server out of the build tree. glxgears runs several hundred fps (I forget the exact number) but even better, used virtually no CPU time, so apparently the IRQ stuff is working. (Radeon 8500 128MB (QL), Pentium III-